Zusammenfassung
Für den urbanen Lebensraum werden derzeit neue Mobilitätssicherungs-Ideen diskutiert. Im Fokus dieser Diskussionen stehen Verkehrssysteme, die konzeptionell zwischen dem motorisierten Individualverkehr (MIV) sowie dem traditionellen öffentlichen Personenverkehr (ÖPV) einzuordnen sind. Ziel ist es, Vorteile des MIV und des ÖPV zu bewahren, aber gleichzeitig jeweilige Nachteile auszuschalten.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Ceder, A. (2015), Public Transit Planning and Operation: Modeling, Practice and Behavior,2nd edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA
Schönberger, J. (2019), Absatzplanung im Öffentlichen Personenverkehr: Treiber und Herausforderungen in einer taktischen Entscheidungssituation, erscheint in Verkehr und Technik
Müller, S., Haase, K. (2015): “Tariff Zone Planning for Public Transport Companies” presentation at CASPT 2015, available at: http://www.caspt.org/proceedings/talk178.pdf (accessed 2 March 2017).
Kohani, M. (2015): Tariff Zones Design in Integrated Transport Systems: a Case Study for the Žilina Municipality. In: Bulucea, A.: Proceedings of Mechanics, Engineering, Environment, 91–97, WSEAS Press
Gattuso, D., Musolino, G. (2007): A simulation approach of fare integration in regional transit services. In: Geraets, E. et al.: Algorithmic Methods for Railway Optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4359, 200–218.
Schöbel, A. (2006) Optimization in Public Transportation: Stop Location, Delay Management and Tariff Zone Design in a Public Transportation Network, Springer, 2006.
Hamacher, H., Schöbel, A. (2004): Design of zone tariff systems in public transportation. Operations Research, Vol. 52 (6), 897–908.
Caro, F., Gallien, J. (2007) Dynamic Assortment with Demand Learning for Seasonal Consumer Goods. Management Science 53(2):276-292
Paulley, N.; Balcombe, R.; Mackett, R.; Titheridge, H.; Preston, J. M.; Wardman, M. R.; Shires, J. D.; White, P. (2006): The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transport Policy, 13(4), pp. 295-306.
Borndörfer, R. Karbstein, M., Pfetsch, M. E. (2006): Models for fare planning in public transport. Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 160, Issue 18, 2591–2605,
Zureiqat, H. M. (2008): Fare Policy Analysis for Public Transport: A Discrete‐Continuous Modeling Approach Using Panel Data, Master Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U., Pisinger, D. (2004) Knapsack Problems. Springer
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schönberger, J. (2020). Optimale Produktportfolios für urbane Mobilitätsleistungen. In: Proff, H. (eds) Neue Dimensionen der Mobilität. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29746-6_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29746-6_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29745-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29746-6
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)