Skip to main content

Kommunikation auf Anwendungsebene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computernetze und Internet of Things

Zusammenfassung

Mit der Kommunikation auf Anwendungsebene ist die netzunabhängige Kommunikation von mindestens zwei Anwendungsprozessen gemeint, welche von der Anwendungsschicht des ISO/OSI-Referenzmodells (siehe Abb. 13.1) umgesetzt wird. Die Adressierung von Elementen sowie die Ermöglichung verbindungsloser und verbindungsorientierter Kommunikation verschiedener Anwendungsinstanzen wird bereits durch die Protokolle der darunter liegenden Schichten sichergestellt, sodass diese als Dienst für die Anwendungsebene bereitstehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. M.A. Sirbu. Content-type header field for Internet messages. RFC 1049 (Historic), March 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Freed and N. Borenstein. Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies. RFC 2045 (Draft Standard), November 1996. Updated by RFCs 2184, 2231, 5335, 6532.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Freed and K. Moore. MIME Parameter Value and Encoded Word Extensions: Character Sets, Languages, and Continuations. RFC 2231 (Proposed Standard), November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Yang, S. Steele, and N. Freed. Internationalized Email Headers. RFC 6532 (Proposed Standard), February 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and H. Frystyk. Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.0. RFC 1945 (Informational), May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach, and T. Berners-Lee. Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616 (Draft Standard), June 1999. Obsoleted by RFCs 7230, 7231, 7232, 7233, 7234, 7235, updated by RFCs 2817, 5785, 6266, 6585.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Fielding and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing. RFC 7230 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Fielding and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content. RFC 7231 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Fielding and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Conditional Requests. RFC 7232 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Fielding, Y. Lafon, and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests. RFC 7233 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Fielding, M. Nottingham, and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Caching. RFC 7234 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Fielding and J. Reschke. Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Authentication. RFC 7235 (Proposed Standard), June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wireshark Foundation. Wireshark webseite, 2019. https://www.wireshark.org.

  14. S. Josefsson. The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings. RFC 4648 (Proposed Standard), October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Postel and J. Reynolds. File Transfer Protocol. RFC 959 (INTERNET STANDARD), October 1985. Updated by RFCs 2228, 2640, 2773, 3659, 5797, 7151.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Bellovin. Firewall-Friendly FTP. RFC 1579 (Informational), February 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Horowitz and S. Lunt. FTP Security Extensions. RFC 2228 (Proposed Standard), October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Allman, S. Ostermann, and C. Metz. FTP Extensions for IPv6 and NATs. RFC 2428 (Proposed Standard), September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Curtin. Internationalization of the File Transfer Protocol. RFC 2640 (Proposed Standard), July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, G. Camarillo, A. Johnston, J. Peterson, R. Sparks, M. Handley, and E. Schooler. SIP: Session Initiation Protocol. RFC 3261 (Proposed Standard), June 2002. Updated by RFCs 3265, 3853, 4320, 4916, 5393, 5621, 5626, 5630, 5922, 5954, 6026, 6141, 6665, 6878.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Handley, V. Jacobson, and C. Perkins. SDP: Session Description Protocol. RFC 4566 (Proposed Standard), July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson. RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications. RFC 3550 (INTERNET STANDARD), July 2003. Updated by RFCs 5506, 5761, 6051, 6222, 7022, 7160, 7164.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rapid7. Penetration testing software | metasploit. http://metasploit.org, 2014.

  24. Inc. Tripwire. Tripwire webseite, 2014. http://www.tripwire.org/.

  25. Inc. Sourcefire. Snort webseite, 2014. http://www.snort.org/.

  26. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Arpwatch - an ethernet monitor program that keeps track of ethernet/ip address pairings. http://ee.lbl.gov/, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick-Benjamin Bök .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bök, PB., Noack, A., Müller, M., Behnke, D. (2020). Kommunikation auf Anwendungsebene. In: Computernetze und Internet of Things. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29409-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics