Advertisement

Analyzing the European Parliamentary Elections in 2019: Actor Visibility and Issue-Framing in Transnational Media

  • Stefan WallaschekEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter looks at the coverage of the 2019 electoral campaigns of the European Parliament (EP) in transnational media and examines the actor visibility and issue-framing by deploying a discourse network analysis. The results demonstrate that various domestic actors from different EU member states are featured in the media and that political conflicts on a transnational migration policy and transnational climate policy are strongly present. These findings shed light on the transnationalization of the public sphere, and the use of studying transnational media in EP electoral campaign.

References

  1. Brüggemann, M., & Schulz-Forberg, H. (2009). Becoming Pan-European? Transnational media and the European public sphere. International Communication Gazette, 71(8), 693–712.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048509345064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chalaby, J. K. (2002). Transnational television in Europe: The role of Pan-European channels. European Journal of Communication, 17(2), 183–203.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323102017002692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ComRes. (2018). Burson-Marsteller – Brussels Media Consumption Survey 2018. Savanta ComRes Research Consultancy. https://www.comresglobal.com/polls/burson-marsteller-media-consumption-survey-2018/. Accessed: 31. Aug. 2019.
  4. de Wilde, P., Michailidou, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2014). Converging on euroscepticism: Online polity contestation during European parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 766–783.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ECPA. (2015). Survey on the importance of media for EU public affairs practitioners. http://theecpa.eu/survey-on-the-importance-of-media-for-eu-public-affairs-practitioners/. Accessed: 30. Aug. 2019.
  6. Firmstone, J. (2008). Approaches of the transnational press to reporting Europe. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 9(4), 423–442.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884908091293.
  7. Heft, A., & Pfetsch, B. (2012). Conditions of the Emergence of a European Public Sphere: Political Actors and Mass Media Under Scrutiny. In L. Morganti & L. Bekemans (Eds.), The European public sphere. From critical thinking to responsible action (pp. 147–164).  https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6253-7.
  8. Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2011). Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 4–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization. An International Journal, 4(1), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., et al. (Hrsg.). (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Leifeld, P. (2016a). Discourse network analysis: Policy debates as dynamic networks. In J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, & M. Lubell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.25.
  12. Leifeld, P. (2016b). Policy debates as dynamic networks: German pension politics and privatization discourse. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  13. Leifeld, P., Gruber, J., & Henrichsen, T. (2019). RDNA – Discourse Network Analysis in R (Version 2.1.16) [R]. https://github.com/leifeld/dna.
  14. Machill, M., Beiler, M., & Fischer, C. (2006). Europe-Topics in Europe’s media: The debate about the European public sphere: A meta-analysis of media content analyses. European Journal of Communication, 21(1), 57–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106060989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlesinger, P. (1999). Changing spaces of political communication: The case of the European union. Political Communication, 16(3), 263–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuck, A. R. T., Xezonakis, G., Elenbaas, M., Banducci, S. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: The 2009 European parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallaschek, S. (2019). Contested solidarity in the Euro crisis and Europe’s migration crisis: A discourse network analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1659844.
  19. Wessler, H., Peters, B., Brüggemann, M., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., & Sifft, S. (Hrsg.). (2008). Transnationalization of public spheres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Wickham, H. (2016). Package ‘rvest’ (Version 0.3.2) [R]. https://github.com/hadley/rvest.
  21. Williams, A. E., & Toula, C. M. (2017). Solidarity framing at the union of national and transnational public spheres. Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1576–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1134274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Für SozialwissenschaftenUniversität HildesheimHildesheimGermany

Personalised recommendations