Skip to main content

The Second Time Around: Status Quo and Reform of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures for Spitzenkandidaten in 2019

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Europawahl 2019

Abstract

In the run-up to the 2019 European elections, the Europarties put forward lead candidates for the presidency of the European Commission. These Spitzenkandidaten were at the forefront of their electoral campaigns. This chapter focuses on how five Europarties—European People’s Party, Party of European Socialists, Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party, European Green Party, European Left—selected their lead candidates and how these procedures have changed compared to the 2014 European elections. The results suggest that the Europarties only made relatively small procedural changes, which did not contribute to the sustainability of the Spitzenkandidaten system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use both the terms Europarties and European parties to refer to the political parties at European level: the extraparliamentary party organizations to be distinguished from the political groups in the European Parliament.

References

  • ALDE. (2019). Team Europe: Seven leaders to renew Europe. ALDE party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., & Popa, S. (2018). This time it was different? The salience of the Spitzenkandidaten system among European parties. West European Politics, 5(41), 1125–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. (2016). After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental change in the EU’s political system? West European Politics, 5(39), 992–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EurActiv. (5 July 2019). Juncker: I was first and last Spitzenkandidat. https://euobserver.com/tickers/145379. Accessed: 30 Aug 2019.

  • European Commission. (2019). Opening statement Ursula von der Leyen European Parliament. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_19_4230. Accessed: 30 Aug 2019.

  • EGP. (2014). Annex to the political evaluation of the common campaign 2014 European elections. EGP.

    Google Scholar 

  • EGP. (2018). Procedure for the 2019 green leading candidates – Spitzenkandidaten. EGP.

    Google Scholar 

  • EL. (2018, September 30). Statutes, as adopted at the Founding Congress of the European Left in Rome, May 9, 2004 with the last amendments approved by the General Assembly meeting in Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPP. (2018). Press release: Political assembly unveils EPP congress preparations and opens the Spitzenkandidat application procedure; adopts resolution on Libya. EPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPP. (2018). EPP Congress Helsinki 2018: Votes per delegation as approved by the Political assembly on 4–5 June 2018. EPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. (2014). A vote for the president? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European parliament elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1528–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1998). Choosing Europe: Real democracy for the European Union. EuroVisions: New dimensions of European integration, Demos collection, 13, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2011). Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European Parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PES. (2011). PES resolution: Selecting our common candidate in 2014. PES.

    Google Scholar 

  • PES. (2015). PES statutes. PES.

    Google Scholar 

  • PES. (2018). Selecting the PES common candidate in 2019. PES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Put, G. J., Van Hecke, S., Cunningham, C., & Wolfs, W. (2016). The choice of Spitzenkandidaten: A comparative analysis of the Europarties’ selection procedures. Politics and Governance, 4(1), 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, H. (2016). The Spitzenkandidaten in the European Parliament election campaign coverage 2014 in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Politics and Governance, 4(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Brug, W., Gattermann, K., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Introduction: How different were the European elections of 2014? Politics and Governance, 4(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hecke, S., Wolfs, W., & De Groof, V. (2018). 25 years of Spitzenkandidaten. What does the future hold? Research Paper, Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

Appendix: List of Semi-structured Interviews with Policy Advisors Undertaken in the Framework of this Chapter

  • Interview A: European People’s Party (EPP) in Brussels, 16 April 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview B: Party of European Socialists (PES) in Leuven, 4 June 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview C: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party (ALDE Party) in Brussels, 27 March 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview D: European Green Party (EGP) in Brussels, 31 January 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview E: European left (EL), Telephone Interview, 28 October 2019.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wouter Wolfs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wolfs, W., Put, GJ., Van Hecke, S. (2020). The Second Time Around: Status Quo and Reform of the Europarties’ Selection Procedures for Spitzenkandidaten in 2019. In: Kaeding, M., Müller, M., Schmälter, J. (eds) Die Europawahl 2019. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29277-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29277-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29276-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29277-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics