Abstract
This chapter sets out to make a practical contribution to the discussion on power relations involved in documentation in early childhood education [ECE]. We suggest ‘professional risk’ as a key concept to understand why and how teachers materialise some of children’s actions and comments in various forms of documentation. The chapter builds on stories of two ECE settings—one Swedish preschool where a science project was documented as a public wall display, and one New Zealand kindergarten where a project about fairness and inclusion was documented in a variety of Learnings Stories in individual children’s portfolios. Our results indicate that the ideals of the ECE setting are likely to govern what teachers choose to document as examples of learning and behaviour. The two cases also highlight that topic matters. It may be riskier for teachers to document children’s ideas about socially sensitive topics like inclusion, compared to documenting children’s ideas about science. Furthermore, the cases indicate that form matters. For example, the narrative credit-based assessment form of a Learning Story seems to steer teachers to await a positive situation, where children’s actions fit with the notion of what is acceptable behaviour in the ECE setting, before they document children’s learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alasuutari, M. 2014. Voicing the child? A case study in Finnish early childhood education. Childhood 21(2): 242–259.
Alnervik, K. 2018. Systematic documentation: Structures and tools in a practice of communicative documentation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 19(1): 72 –84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118762147.
Areljung, S., and J. Kelly-Ware. 2017. Navigating the risky terrain of children’s working theories. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 37(4): 370–385.
Basford, J., and C. Bath. 2014. Playing the assessment game: An English early childhood education perspective. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 34(2): 119–132.
Carr, M. 2001. Assessment in Early Childhood Settings: Learning Stories. London: SAGE.
Carr, M., and W. Lee. 2012. Learning Stories. Constructing Learner Identities in Early Education. London: SAGE.
Claxton, G., and M. Carr. 2004. A framework for teaching learning: The dynamics of disposition. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 24(1): 87–97.
Elfström, I. 2013. Uppföljning och utvärdering för förändring: pedagogisk dokumentation som grund för kontinuerlig verksamhetsutveckling och systematiskt kvalitetsarbete i förskolan. Doctoral diss. Stockholm University.
Fleet, A., C. Patterson, and J. Robertson, eds. 2006. Insights: Behind Early Childhood Pedagogical Documentation. Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon Press.
McNally, S. A., and R. Slutsky. 2017. Key elements of the Reggio Emilia approach and how they are interconnected to create the highly regarded system of early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care 187(12): 1925–1937.
Ministry of Education. 2004. Kei tua o te pae: Booklet 1 - An Introduction to kei tua o te pae: Assessment for Learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. 1996. Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa. Early Childhood Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
Skolverket (2019). Pedagogisk dokumentation i förskolan. https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/inspiration-och-stod-i-arbetet/stod-i-arbetet/pedagogisk-dokumentation-i-forskolan. Accessed: 30 April 2019.
Skolverket (2011). Läroplan för förskolan Lpfö 98. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Sparrman, A., and A. Lindgren. 2010. Visual documentation as a normalizing practice: A new discourse of visibility in preschool. Surveillance and Society 7(3/4): 248–261.
Sundberg, B., S. Areljung, K. Due, K. Ekström, C. Ottander, and B. Tellgren. 2018. Opportunities for and obstacles to science in preschools: Views from a community perspective. International Journal of Science Education 40(1): 2061–2077.
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Areljung, S., Kelly-Ware, J.P. (2020). The Risks of Reification: Using ‘Professional Risk’ to Understand Why and How Teachers Choose to Document (Some of) Children’s Ideas and Actions. In: Alasuutari, M., Kelle, H., Knauf, H. (eds) Documentation in Institutional Contexts of Early Childhood. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28193-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28193-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28192-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28193-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)