Skip to main content

Delineating the South Tyrolean Law on Agritourism: You Can’t Compare Apples and Oranges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Destination und Lebensraum

Part of the book series: Entrepreneurial Management und Standortentwicklung ((EMUS))

Zusammenfassung

The aim of this paper is to delineate agritourism in South Tyrol by defining its limits from a legal perspective. This is necessary due to the debate in political fora and both academic (Streifeneder, 2016) and non-academic circles about whether agritourism can be compared to other tourism activities, and in particular to small landlords. I will argue that such a comparison does not make sense, as agritourism cannot be considered without considering the role of agriculture and the different tasks linked to it.

Completed in autumn 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Agriturist. (2017). Leggi regionali agriturismo Autorizzazioni Limiti [Online] Available at: http://www.agriturist.it/it/leggi-regionali-agriturismo/30-4248.html. Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Albisinni, F. (1998). Agriturismo e Turismo rurale: pluralità di modelli aziendali, disciplina legislativa ed ipotesi interpretative. In: Riv. dir. agr., S. 266–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albissini, F. (2003). Attività agrituristica e provenienza aziendale dei prodotti. Diritto e giurisprudenza agraria e dell’ambiente 12: S. 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, R., Pisciotta, G. (2010). L’ impresa agricola. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford, D. & Hassapoyannes, K. (2015). The Common Agricultural Policy in 2020: Responding to climate change. In: McMahon, J. & Cardwell, M. (eds.) Research Handbook on EU Agriculture Law: Edward Elgar Publishing, S. 170–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodiguel, L. (2014). Agricoltura sostenibile: il sogno di un diritto. In: Manservisi, S., (ed). Studi in onore di Luigi Costato. Jovene: Napoli, S. 191–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, M. N. & McMahon, J. A. (2015). Looking back to look forward. In: McMahon, J. & Cardwell, M., (eds.). Research Handbook on EU Agriculture Law: Edward Elgar Publishing, S. 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassazione civile I. (2010). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Massima?idDocMaster=477977&idDataBanks=0&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=1&NavId=2053794775&IsCorr=True. Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Cassazione civile I. (2011). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Sentenze?idDocMaster=2828093&idDataBanks=2&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=0.Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Cassazione civile I. (2012). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Sentenze?idDocMaster=3308724&idDataBanks=2&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=0.Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Cassazione civile I. (2013). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Massima?idDocMaster=4077063&idDataBanks=0&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=1&NavId=1978751583&IsCorr=False. Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Cassazione civile I. (2015). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Sentenze?idDocMaster=4480236&idDataBanks=2&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=1&NavId=1482989762&IsCorr=False. Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Cassazione civile I. (2016). Available at: https://www.iusexplorer.it/Giurisprudenza/Massima?idDocMaster=5174175&idDataBanks=0&idUnitaDoc=0&nVigUnitaDoc=1&pagina=1&NavId=1704153589&pid=19&IsCorr=False. Accessed on 18 October 2017.

  • Clapp, J. (2016). The trade-ification of the food sustainability agenda. In: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44, p. 335–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T., Hart, K. & Baldock, D. (2009). Provision of Public Goods through Agriculture in the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu, M. (2003). La nuova impresa agricola tra diritto agrario e diritto commerciale. In: Riv. dir. civ., S. 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costato, L. & Russo, L. (2015). Corso di diritto agrario italiano e comunitario. Giuffrè: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekardt, F. (2005). Das Prinzip Nachhaltigkeit: Generationengerechtigkeit und globale Gerechtigkeit. Beck: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekardt, F. (2011). Klimawandel, Menschenrechte und neues Freiheitsverständnis – Herausforderungen der politischen Ethik. In: Byrd, B. S., Hruschka, J. & Joerden, J. C., (eds.). Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik: Themenschwerpunkt: Politische Ethik / Political Ethics. Duncker & Humblot: Berlin, S. 117–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016). Cork 2.0 Declaration 2016: “A Better Life in Rural Areas” [Online] Available at: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/cork-declaration_en.pdf. Accessed on 17 October 2017.

  • European Commission. Rural development 2014–2020 [Online] Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rural-development-2014-2020_en. Accessed on 17 October 2017.

  • Ferrucci, N. (2007). L’agriturismo:icona della trasversalità dell’agricoltura tra impresa, alimentazione, ambiente e paesaggio. Rivista di Diritto Agrario: S. 679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiume Fagioli, F., Diotallevi, F. & Ciani, A. (2014). Strengthening the sustainability of rural areas: The role of rural tourism and agritourism. In: Rivista di Economia Agraria, S. 155–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francario, L. (2003). L’impresa agricola di prestazione di servizi. In: Costato, L. & Abrami, A., (eds.). Trattato breve di diritto agrario italiano e comunitario. CEDAM: Padova, S. 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T. (2013). Food sustainability: Problems, perspectives and solutions. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72, S. 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T., Mathewson, S., Angelides, P. & Borthwick, F. (2015). Policies and actions to shift eating patterns: What works?: A review of the evidence of the effectiveness of interventions aimed at shifting diets in more sustainable and healthy directions. [Online] Available at: http://www.fcrn.org.uk/fcrn-publications/reports/policies-and-actions-shift-eatingpatterns-what-works. Accessed on 17 October 2017.

  • Gehne, K. (2011). Nachhaltige Entwicklung als Rechtsprinzip: Normativer Aussagegehalt, rechtstheoretische Einordnung, Funktionen im Recht. Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanò, A. (2016). Manuale di diritto agrario. G. Giappichelli: Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanò, A. & Rook Basile, E. (2013a). 2135. In: Cagnasso, O. & Vallebona, A., (eds.). Commentario del Codice Civile diretto da Enrico Gabrielli: Dell’impresa e del lavoro – Vol. III: artt. 2118–2187: UTET GIURIDICA, S. 724–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanò, A. & Rook Basile, E. (2013b). 2135. In: Cagnasso, O. & Vallebona, A., (eds.). Commentario del Codice Civile diretto da Enrico Gabrielli: Dell’impresa e del lavoro – Vol. III: artt. 2118–2187: UTET GIURIDICA, S. 591–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germanò, A. & Rook Basile, E. (2013c). 2135. In: Cagnasso, O. & Vallebona, A., (eds.). Commentario del Codice Civile diretto da Enrico Gabrielli: Dell’impresa e del lavoro – Vol. III: artt. 2118–2187: UTET GIURIDICA, S. 606–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannarelli, A. (2014). Il divenire del diritto agrario italiano ed europeo tra sviluppi tecnologici e sostenibilità. In: Sgarbanti, G., Borghi, P. & Germanò, A., (eds.). Il divenire del diritto agrario italiano ed europeo tra sviluppi tecnologici e sostenibilità: Convegno organizzato in onore del Prof. Ettore Casadei, in occasione del suo 70° compleanno atti del Convegno IDAIC, Bologna-Rovigo, 25–26 ottobre 2012. Giuffrè: Milano, S. 11–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, R. E. & Bosselmann, K. (2015). Operationalizing Sustainable Development: Ecological Integrity as a Grundnorm of International Law. In: RECIEL, 24, p. 194–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesregierung der Autonomen Provinz Bozen. (2008). Deliberation n. 4617/2008. Festlegung der Voraussetzungen für die Ausübung der „Urlaub auf dem Bauernhof“ Tätigkeit Available at: http://lexbrowser.provinz.bz.it/doc/de/6167/beschluss_vom_9_dezember_2008_nr_4617.aspx?view=1. Accessed on 18 October 2018.

  • Landtag der Autonomen Provinz Bozen. (2008). Law n. 7/2008. Available at: http://lexbrowser.provincia.bz.it/doc/de/lp-2008-7/landesgesetz_vom_19_september_2008_nr_7.aspx. Accessed on 18 October 2018.

  • Manservisi, S. (2014). Il principio dello sviluppo sostenibile: da Rio+20 al diritto dell’Unione europea e il suo fondamentale ruolo nel diritto agrario. In: Sgarbanti, G., Borghi, P. & Germanò, A., (eds.). Il divenire del diritto agrario italiano ed europeo tra sviluppi tecnologici e sostenibilità: Convegno organizzato in onore del Prof. Ettore Casadei, in occasione del suo 70° compleanno atti del Convegno IDAIC, Bologna-Rovigo, 25–26 ottobre 2012. Giuffrè: Milano, S. 175–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masini, S. (2012). Impresa agricola, valorizzazione del territorio e fornitura di servizi faunistico-venatori. In: Aestimum, S. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monien, J. (2014). Prinzipien als Wegbereiter eines globalen Umweltrechts?: Das Nachhaltigkeits-, Vorsorge- und Verursacherprinzip im Mehrebenensystem. Zugl.: Bochum, Univ., Diss., 2013. Nomos: Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolini, L. (2013). 2135. In: Cagnasso, O. & Vallebona, A., (eds.). Commentario del Codice Civile diretto da Enrico Gabrielli: Dell’impresa e del lavoro – Vol. III: artt. 2118–2187: UTET GIURIDICA, S. 745–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlamento italiano. (2006). Disciplina dell’agriturismo. Available at: http://www.camera.it/parlam/leggi/06096l.htm. Accessed on 18 October 2018.

  • Potter, C. (2015). Agricultural multifunctionality, working lands and public goods: Contested models of agri-environmental governance under the Common Agricultural Policy. In: McMahon, J. & Cardwell, M., (eds.). Research Handbook on EU Agriculture Law: Edward Elgar Publishing, S. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachmann, B. D. (2014). Nachhaltigkeit – ein oft gebrauchter (Rechts-)Begriff [Online] Available at: https://www.juwiss.de/117-2014/. Accessed on 16 October 2017.

  • Ragionieri, M. P. (2003a). (segue): il carattere della multifunzionalità riferito all’impresa agricola. In: Costato, L. & Abrami, A., (eds.). Trattato breve di diritto agrario italiano e comunitario. CEDAM: Padova, S. 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragionieri, M. P. (2003b). (segue): strumenti di attuazione della politica di sviluppo agricolo nel segno della multifunzionalità dell›impresa agricola. In: Costato, L. & Abrami, A., (eds.). Trattato breve di diritto agrario italiano e comunitario. Padova: CEDAM, S. 206–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regoliosi, C. (2008). L’ impresa agrituristica: Status e possibilità di sviluppo ; con un’indagine nel territorio della Regione Lazio. Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romagnoli, E. (2003). (segue): si allargano i confini della materia agricola. Poteri e responsabilità dell’imprenditore agricolo. In: Costato, L. & Abrami, A., (eds.). Trattato breve di diritto agrario italiano e comunitario. CEDAM: Padova, S. 211–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjafjell, B. (2012). Quo vadis, Europe?: The significance of sustainable development as objective, principle and the rule of EU law. In: Bailliet, C., (ed.). Non-state actors, soft law and protective regimes: From the margins. Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, S. 254–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rom: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streifeneder, T. (2016). Agriculture first: Assessing European policies and scientific typologies to define authentic agritourism and differentiate it from countryside tourism. In: Tourism Management Perspectives, 20, S. 251–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolino, E. (2016). Impresa agricola (agriturismo) e turismo di lusso. In: DGA, S. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasini, D. (2012). Geografia, paesaggio, identità e agriturismo in Alto Adige-Südtirol. FrancoAngeli: Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals: 17 goals to transform our world [Online] Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/. Accessed on 17 October 2017.

  • Vanni, F. (2014). Agriculture and Public Goods. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Miribung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miribung, G. (2019). Delineating the South Tyrolean Law on Agritourism: You Can’t Compare Apples and Oranges. In: Pechlaner, H. (eds) Destination und Lebensraum. Entrepreneurial Management und Standortentwicklung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28110-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28110-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-28109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-28110-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics