Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Custom Tokens und Smart Contracts zur Projektsteuerung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blockchain

Part of the book series: Edition HMD ((EHMD))

Zusammenfassung

Blockchain-Anwendungen werden bisher primär für marktbezogene Transaktionen diskutiert. Wir ergänzen dies und fokussieren auf organisationsinterne Steuerungsprozesse. Dabei loten wir das Potenzial von Custom Tokens und Smart Contracts besonders für die Koordination und Steuerung von Projekten aus. Anwendungsversuche und Forschungen sind hier bisher noch spärlich. Das Projektmanagement bietet sich an, weil es sich durch eine hohe Standardisierung auszeichnet und bereits heute in hohem Masse durch IT unterstützt wird. Smart Contracts lassen sich mit entsprechenden Sprachen für die Implementierung von Projektaufträgen, von Meilensteinen sowie „Gates“ und des Projektabschlusses anwenden. Custom Tokens bieten dazu die Möglichkeit der Anreizgestaltung. Wir beleuchten mögliche Effekte vor dem Hintergrund sozialpsychologischer und organisationsbezogener Forschungen.

Überarbeiteter Beitrag basierend auf Schützender et al. (2018) Verwendung von Blockchain und Custom Tokens zur Projektkoordination – Ein Pilotversuch, HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik Heft 324, 55(6): 1285–1296.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Androulaki E et al. (2018) Hyperledger fabric: a distributed operating system for permissioned blockchains. In: EuroSys ’18 proceedings of the thirteenth EuroSys conference, Article No. 30, Porto, Portogal – April 23–26, 2018, ACM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Azanha A, Tiradentes Terra Argoud AR, Junior B d C, Joao Domingos Antoniolli P (2017) Agile project management with Scrum: a case study of a Brazilian pharmaceutical company IT project. Int J Manag Proj Bus 10(1):121–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baliga A, Subhod I, Kamat P, Chatterjee S (2018) Performance evaluation of the quorum blockchain platform, arXiv:1809.03421. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03421. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Brent L, Jurisevic A, Kong M, Liu E, Gauthier F, Gramoli V, Holz R, Scholz B (2018) Vandal: a scalable security analysis framework for smart contracts, arXiv:1809.03981. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03981. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1998) Competing on the Edge. Strategy as Structured Chaos. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Buterin V (2016) Standardized contract APIs. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Standardized_Contract_APIs. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Cadsby CB, Song F, Tapon F (2007) Sorting and incentive effects of pay-for- performance: an experimental investigation. Acad Manag J 50:387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardano (2019) Homepage. https://www.cardano.org/en/what-is-cardano/. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Carpenter J, Dolifka D (2017) Exploitation aversion: when financial incentives fail to motivate agents. J Econ Psychol 61:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT (2014) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 140(4):980–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Rankings (CCID) (2019). http://special.ccidnet.com/pub-bc-eval/index.shtml. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Christidis K, Devetsikiotis M (2016) Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access 4:2292–2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coinmarketcap (2019). http://www.coinmarketcap.com. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Cooper RG (2006) Managing technology development projects. Res Technol Manag 1990:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford SES, Ostrom E (1995) A grammar of institutions. Am Polit Sci Rev 89(3):582–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci EL (1972) The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organ Behav Hum Perform 8(2):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EOS.IO (2018) EOS.IO technical white paper v2 (2018). https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Fenu G, Marchesi L, Marchesi M, Tonelli R (2018) The ICO phenomenon and its relationships with Ethereum smart contract environment. In: Blockchain oriented software engineering (IWBOSE), 2018 International Workshop on, Italy, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez AS, Le Roy F, Chiambaretto P (2017) Implementing the right project structure to achieve coopetitive innovation projects. Long Range Plan 51:384–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST (2011) Envy Up, Scorn Down. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz CK, Nowostawski M (2016) From institutions to code: towards automated generation of smart contracts. In: Proceedings – IEEE 1st international workshops on foundations and applications of self-systems (FAS-W) 2016 (November 2017):210–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garbers Y, Konradt U (2014) The effect of financial incentives on performance: a quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. J Occup Organ Psychol 87(1):102–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga M, Arias M, De Renzis A (2018) Blockchain and cryptocurrency: a comparative framework of the main architectural drivers, arXiv:1812.08806. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08806. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Gerhart B, Rynes SL, Fulmer IS (2009) Pay and performance: individuals, groups, and executives. Acad Manag Ann 3(1):251–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haji-Kazemi S, Andersen B, Klakegg OJ (2015) Barriers against effective responses to early warning signs in projects. Int J Proj Manag 33(5):1068–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman D, Bognanno M (2017) High-powered performance pay and crowding out of nonmonetary motives. Manag Sci 64(10):4669–4680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JPMorganChase, Quorum (2019). https://github.com/jpmorganchase/quorum. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Lehner JM (2001) Praxisorientiertes Projektmanagement. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner JM (2009) The staging model: the contribution of classical theatre directors to project management in development contexts. Int J Proj Manag 27(3):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke EE, Latham G (1990) Goal setting. A motivational technique that works! Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Micobo Gmbh (2018) Difference between Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric and R3 corda. https://medium.com/@micobo/technical-difference-betweenethereum-hyperledger-fabric-and-r3-corda-5a58d0a6e347. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA (2009) Coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad Manag Ann 3(1):463–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olawale Y, Sun M (2015) Construction project control in the UK: current practice, existing problems and recommendations for future improvement. Int J Proj Manag 33(3):623–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm Sci Q 25:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parizi R.M., Amritraj, Dehghantanha A. (2018) Smart contract programming languages on blockchains: an empirical evaluation of usability and security. In: Chen S. et al. (eds) Blockchain – ICBC 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94478-4_6. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • PMBoK (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Pennsylvania, USA. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack J (2007) The changing paradigms of project management. Int J Proj Manag 25:266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provasi R, Farag S (2013) Accounting in ancient times: a review of classic references. Account Financ Hist Res Journal 5:68–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramezan G, Leung C (2018) A blockchain-based contractual routing protocol for the internet of things using smart contracts. Wirel Commun Mob Com. 2018: Article ID 4029591, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4029591. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Schützeneder P, Sametinger J, Lehner J (2018) Verwendung von Blockchain und Custom Tokens zur Projektkoordination – Ein Pilotversuch. HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik 55:1285. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-018-00446-w. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Sheth H, Dattani J (2019) Overview of blockchain technology. Asian journal for convergence in technology (AJCT). http://asianssr.org/index.php/ajct/article/view/728. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Shteynberg G, Galinsky AD (2011) Implicit coordination: sharing goals with similar others intensifies goal pursuit. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(6):1291–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirer EG (2016) Thoughts on The DAO hack. http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/17/thoughts-on-the-dao-hack/. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Sklaroff J (2017) Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. Univ Pa Law Rev 166(263):262–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16(1):27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR (1999) The handbook of project management. McGraw Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR, Cochrane RA (1993) The goals and methods matrix: coping with projects for which the goals and/or methods of achieving them are ill-defined. Int J Proj Manag 11(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner R, Ledwith A, Kelly J (2010) Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm. Int J Proj Manag 28(8):744–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Um KH, Kim SM (2018) Collaboration and opportunism as mediators of the relationship between NPD project uncertainty and NPD project performance. Int J Proj Manag. Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA 36(4):659–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waves (2019), Waves platform documentation. https://docs.wavesplatform.com/en. Zugegriffen am 03.12.2019

  • Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Sociol 87(3):548–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüst K, Gervais A (2017) Do you need a blockchain? Department of Computer Science ETH, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharie MA, Osoian CL (2016) Peer review motivation frames: a qualitative approach. Eur Manag J 34(1):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Österreich

    Johannes Lehner, Philipp Schützeneder & Johannes Sametinger

Authors
  1. Johannes Lehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philipp Schützeneder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johannes Sametinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Sametinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Hans-Georg Fill

  2. Universität Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Andreas Meier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lehner, J., Schützeneder, P., Sametinger, J. (2020). Custom Tokens und Smart Contracts zur Projektsteuerung. In: Fill, HG., Meier, A. (eds) Blockchain . Edition HMD. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28006-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation