Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Grundsätze für die Allokation knapper medizinischer Interventionen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medizinethik

Part of the book series: Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik ((GAE))

  • 5879 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Philosoph und Jurist Govind Persad ist Assistenzprofessor am Sturm College of Law der University of Denver, USA. Zu seinen Forschungsinteressen zählt die Verteilung und Priorisierung knapper medizinischer Güter unter Bedingungen ökonomischer Ungleichheit. Der 2015 verstorbene Philosoph Alan P. Wertheimer lehrte bis 2005 Politikwissenschaft an der University of Vermont in Burlington, USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alexander, G. C./Werner, R. M./Ubel, P. A. (2004): The costs of denying scarcity. Archives of Internal Medicine 164, S. 593 – 596.

    Google Scholar 

  • AMA – American Medical Association (2009): Allocation of limited medical resources. URL: https://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/Codeof_Med_Eth/opinion/opinion203.html (19. Januar 2009, Webseite existiert nicht mehr).

  • Anderson, E. (1999): What is the point of equality ? Ethics 109, S. 287 – 337 (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Warum eigentlich Gleichheit ? in A. Krebs (Hrsg.): Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles (2000): Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Nikomachische Ethik).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arns, W./Citterio, F./Campistol, J. M. (2007): Old-for-old – New strategies for renal transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 22, S. 336 – 341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arras, J. D. (2005): Rationing vaccine during an avian influenza pandemic: Why it won’t be easy. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 78, S. 287 – 300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. A./Eisenbarth, G. S. (2001): Type 1 diabetes: New perspectives on disease pathogenesis and treatment. The Lancet 358, S. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATS – American Thoracic Society Bioethics Task Force. (1997): Fair allocation of intensive care unit resources. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 156, S. 1282 – 1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T./Childress, J. F. (2001): Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billittier, A. J. (2005): Who goes first ? Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 11, S. 267 – 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, D. W. (2001): Children’s rights to health care. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26, S. 163 – 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2003): Separate spheres and indirect benefits. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 1, S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2004): The misplaced role of urgency in allocation of persistently scarce life-saving organs. In: T. Gutmann et al. (Hrsg.): Ethical, legal, and social issues in organ transplantation. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, S. 41 – 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (1984): Selecting people randomly. Ethics 95, S. 38 – 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1942): The effect of war on the American family. American Journal of Sociology 48, S. 343 – 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G./Bobbitt, P. (1978): Tragic choices: The conflicts society confronts in the allocation of tragically scarce resources. New York: WW Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1995): Setting limits: Medical goals in an aging society. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. L. (1987): Organ transplant rationing: A window to the future ? Health Progress 68, S. 40 – 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J. F. (2001): Putting patients first in organ allocation: an ethical analysis of the US debate. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10, S. 365 – 376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, R./Dolan, P. (2000): Principles of justice in health care rationing. Journal of Medical Ethics 26, S. 323 – 329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1988): Am I my parents’ keeper ? An essay on justice between the young and

    Google Scholar 

  • the old. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2000): Accountability for reasonableness. The BMJ 321, S. 1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005): Fair process in patient selection for antiretroviral treatment in WHO’s goal of 3 by 5. The Lancet 366, S. 169 – 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2004): How to achieve fair distribution of ARTs in 3 by 5: Fair process and legitimacy in patient selection. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • DHHS – Department of Health and Human Services (2009): Draft guidance on allocating and targeting pandemic influenza vaccine. URL: https://www.fbiic.gov/public/2009/june/PandemicFluVaccineallocationguidance.pdf (23. Februar 2021).

  • Dworkin, R. M. (1993): Life’s dominion. New York: Knopf (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Die Grenzen des Lebens).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002): Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. New York: Harvard University Press (teilweise auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Was ist Gleichheit ?).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhauge, E. (1994): Allocating health care morally. California Law Review 82, S. 1449 – 1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J. (2006): Finding new ethical conceptions through practical ethics: global justice and the ‚standard of care‘ debates. Paper presented at: University of Toronto Center for Ethics, Inaugural Conference: Is there progress in ethics ? Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J./Wertheimer A. (2006): Who should get influenza vaccine when not all can ? Science 312, S. 854 – 855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. G. (1997): The rationing debate: Rationing health care by age: The case against. The BMJ 314, S. 822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (2008): Beyond accountability for reasonableness. Bioethics 22, S. 101 – 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. (1977): Causing death and saving lives. New York: Penguin. Hadorn, D. C. (1991): The Oregon priority-setting exercise: Quality of life and public policy. Hastings Center Report 21, S. S11 – 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1985): The value of life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Der Wert des Lebens).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1987): QALYfying the value of life. Journal of Medical Ethics 13, S. 117 – 123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasman, A./Holm, S. (2005): Accountability for reasonableness: Opening the black box of process. Health Care Analysis 13, S. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T./Sprigings, D./Crisp, R. (1993): ‚Not clinically indicated‘: Patients’ interests or resource allocation ? The BMJ 306, S. 379 – 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, D. H. (2001): Hope versus efficiency in organ allocation. Transplantation 72, S. 1169 – 1173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, N.-H./Strudler, A./Wasserman, D. (2006): The numbers problem. Philosophy & Public Affairs 34, S. 352 – 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jecker, N. S./Pearlman, R. A. (1989): Ethical constraints on rationing medical care by age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 37, S. 1067 – 1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R. (1986): Bentham in a box: Technology assessment and health care allocation. Law, Medicine & Health Care 14, S. 172 – 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamm, F. M. (1993): Morality, mortality, vol. 1: Death and whom to save from it. New

    Google Scholar 

  • York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappel, K./Sandøe, P. (1992): QALYs, age and fairness. Bioethics 6, S. 297 – 316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2006): Session 5: Organ donation, procurement, allocation, and transplantation: policy options. The President’s Council on Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kind, P. et al. (1999): UK Population Norms for EQ-5D. Centre for Health Economics, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanken, P. N./Terry, P. B./Osborne, M. L. (1997): Ethics of allocating intensive care unit resources. Baltimore: New horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M. J. (1992): Who should get the kidney machine ? Journal of Medical Ethics 18, S. 12 – 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, P.-E. (2003): Hard choices in public health: The allocation of scarce resources. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 31, S. 156 – 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B./White, D. B. (2007): Intensive care unit triage during an influenza pandemic: The need for specific clinical guidelines. Paper presented at: Ethical and legal considerations in mitigating pandemic disease. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (2004): Ethics and equity in access to HIV treatment: 3 by 5 initiative. URL: https://www.who.int/ethics/en/background-macklin.pdf (8. März 2005).

  • Mathers, C. D. et al. (2001): Healthy life expectancy in 191 countries, 1999. The Lancet 357, S. 1685.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, L. J. et al. (2005): Which patients first ? Setting priorities for antiretroviral therapy where resources are limited. American Journal of Public Health 95, S. 1173 – 1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, M. (2003): Cost-utility analysis: Use QALYs only with great caution. Canadian Medical Association Journal 168, S. 433.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKerlie, D. (2001): Justice between the young and the old. Philosophy & Public Affairs 30, S. 152 – 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKie, J./Richardson, J. (2005): Neglected equity issues in cost-effectiveness analysis, Part 1: Severity of pre-treatment condition, realisation of potential for health, concentration and dispersion of health benefits, and age-related social preferences. Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, P. et al. (2002): The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: A preliminary normative analysis. Social Science & Medicine 55, S. 2149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, J./Martin, D. K./Singer, P. A. (2003): Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: Qualitative case study. Critical Care Medicine 31, S. 2764 – 2768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. W. (1998): Listing criteria for cardiac transplantation: Results of an American Society of Transplant Physicians-National Institutes of Health conference. Transplantation 66, S. 947 – 951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreim, E. H. (1995): Lifestyles of the risky and infamous. From managed care to managed lives. Hastings Center Report 25, S. 5 – 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005): Another kind of end-run: Status upgrades. The American Journal of Bioethics 5, S. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, T. F. (2004): Gaming the transplant system. The American Journal of Bioethics 4, S. W28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C. J. L. (1997): Acharya AK. Understanding DALYs. Journal of Health Economics 16, S. 703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutinga, N./Brennan, D. C./Schnitzler, M. A. (2005): Consequences of eliminating HLA-B in deceased donor kidney allocation to increase minority transplantation. American Journal of Transplantation 5, S. 1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2005): Equality. In: Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press, S. 106 – 127 (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Gleichheit in Letzte Fragen).

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE – National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2003): Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. NICE: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oniscu, G. C. et al. (2003): Equity of access to renal transplant waiting list and renal transplantation in Scotland: Cohort study. The BMJ 327, S. 1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPTN – Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (2007): Public Forum to Discuss Kidney Allocation Policy Development Synopsis. Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1997): Equality and priority. Ratio 10, S. 202 – 221 (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Gleichheit und Vorrangigkeit in A. Krebs (Hrsg.): Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. (2006): Current status of surge research. Academic Emergency Medicine 13, S. 1103 – 1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost, P./Angus, D. C. (2001): Economics of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 29 (2 suppl), N46 – N51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. (2002): The patient as person: Exploration in medical ethics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, M. D./Culyer, A. J. (2004): National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. The BMJ 329, S. 224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999): A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001): The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Das Recht der Völker).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1969): The allocation of exotic medical lifesaving therapy. Ethics 79, S. 173 – 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1999): Age weighting and discounting: What are the ethical issues ? Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin, M. M. (1995): Protecting elderly people: Flaws in ageist arguments. The BMJ 310, S. 1179 – 1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, F. D. (1937): Second Inaugural Address. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, L. B. et al. (1996): Cost-effectiveness analysis as a guide to resource allocation in health: Roles and limitations. In: M. R. Gold et al. (Hrsg.): Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, S. 3 – 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutecki, G. W./Kilner, J. F. (1999): Dialysis as a resource allocation paradigm: Confronting tragic choices once again ? Seminars in Dialysis 12, S. 38 – 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D./Dukeminier, J. (1968): Medical advance and legal lag: Hemodialysis and kidney transplantation. UCLA Law Review 15, S. 357 – 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B. (2002): Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: A review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expectations 5, S. 210 – 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973): On economic inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Ökonomische Ungleichheit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. R./Kipp, K. (2007): Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence. London: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, W. A./Chalmers, I. (2001): Casting and drawing lots: A time honoured way of dealing with uncertainty and ensuring fairness. The BMJ 323, S. 1467 – 1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. S. (2002): The distribution of life-saving medical resources: Equality, life expectancy, and choice behind the veil. Social Philosophy and Policy 19, S. 212 – 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, M.-X. et al. (1996): Effect of oestrogen during menopause on risk and age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet 348, S. 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truog, R. D. et al. (2006): Rationing in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine 34, S. 958 – 963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, A./Dolan, P./Shaw, R. (2003): Measuring people’s preferences regarding ageism in health: Some methodological issues and some fresh evidence. Social Science & Medicine 57, S. 687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubel, P. A. et al. (2000): Improving value measurement in cost-effectiveness analysis. Medical Care 38, S. 892.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNOS – United Network for Organ Sharing (2008): Policies, URL: https://www.unos.org/policiesandbylaws/policies.asp (30. September 2008, Webseite ist nicht mehr erreichbar).

  • Veatch, R. M. (2001): Professor Veatch’s reply [to Dan Brock’s Equity in Liver Allocation]. Medical Ethics 7, S. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2005): Disaster preparedness and triage. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 72, S. 236 – 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. (1999): Inequalities in health and intergenerational equity. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2, S. 47 – 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink, S. et al. (2005): Examining the potential exploitation of UNOS policies. The American Journal of Bioethics 5, S. 6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Denver, USA

    Govind Persad

  2. Universität Vermont, Vermont, USA

    Alan Wertheimer

  3. Philadelphia, USA

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel

Authors
  1. Govind Persad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Wertheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ezekiel J. Emanuel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Nikola Biller-Andorno

  2. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Klinische Ethik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Settimio Monteverde

  3. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Klinische Ethik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Tanja Krones

  4. Institut für Biomedizinische Ethik und Medizingeschichte, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Tobias Eichinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Persad, G., Wertheimer, A., Emanuel, E.J. (2021). Grundsätze für die Allokation knapper medizinischer Interventionen. In: Biller-Andorno, N., Monteverde, S., Krones, T., Eichinger, T. (eds) Medizinethik. Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27695-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27696-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation