Skip to main content

Rapport, Empathy and Professional Identity: Some Challenges for International Medical Graduates Speaking English as a Second or Foreign Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilingual Healthcare

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((INTSE))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the communicative challenges faced by international medical graduates (IMGs; doctors from non-English speaking backgrounds who have trained in different medical cultures) as they enact their professional roles in English within Australia. We concentrate on how differences in their interaction with patients may relate to their awareness and control of pragmatic features in English and to different expectations of patient-centred care in medical encounters across cultures. We draw on four data sets: interviews with international medical scholars; audio-recordings of authentic, surgical consultations and video-recordings of simulated doctor-patient interactions conducted for training purposes and mock exams. Using techniques from applied linguistics and discourse analysis we analyse linguistic and other communicative means used to establish rapport and empathy within an Australian context of patient-centred care. We show that sociopragmatic differences across cultures in doctor-patient roles, relationships and expectations as well as pragmalinguistic differences across languages and cultures can impact on how IMGs can successfully portray their professional identity and also how approachable and caring they appear to their patients before considering the implications for professional practice.

The authors wish to thank colleagues Peter Roger and Margo Lecompte, Beth Mulligan, Kathryn Ogden, Kim Rooney and Brooke Sheldon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Australian Medical Council (AMC) tests required for registration are the Multiple Choice Question exam and the AMC clinical examination.

References

  • Adolphs, S., Atkins, S., & Harvey, K. (2007). Caught between professional requirements and interpersonal needs: Vague language in healthcare contexts. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 62–78). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2016). Medical practitioner workforce 2015. Who are medical practitioners. Cat. no. WEB 140. (HWL 47). Canberra: AIHW. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/medical-practitioners-workforce-2015/contents/who-are-medical-practitioners. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Australian Medical Council. (2017). Australian Medical Council Annual Report 2017. http://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/publications/annual_reports/2017-annual-report.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Hartford, B. (2005). Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, C., Stevenson, F. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2001). Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice. Social Science and Medicine,53, 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, M. C., Roter, D., Larson, S., Levinson, W., Ford, D. E., & Frankel, R. (2004a). What do physicians tell patients about themselves? A qualitative analysis of physician self-disclosure. Journal of General Internal Medicine,19(9), 911–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, M. C., Roter, D., Rubin, H., Frankel, R., Levinson, W., & Ford, D. E. (2004b). Is physician self-disclosure related to patient evaluation of office visits? Journal of General Internal Medicine,19(9), 905–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensing, J. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Social Science and Medicine,32(11), 1301–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caffi, C. (1999). On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics,31(7), 881–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00098-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, M. (2004). The dynamic consultation. A discourse analytical study of doctor-patient communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coulehan, J. L., Platt, F. W., Egener, B., Frankel, R., Lin, C.-T., Lown, B., et al. (2001). “Let me see if I have this right…”: Words that help build empathy. Annals of Internal Medicine,135(3), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R. (2011a). Exploring perception and use of everyday language and medical terminology among international medical graduates in a medical ESP course in Australia. English for Specific Purposes,30(3), 186–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R. (2011b). Patient centred care—Are international medical graduates ‘expert novices’? Australian Family Physician,40(11), 895–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R. (2012a). Coming to terms with medical terms—Exploring insights from native and non-native English speakers in patient-physician communication. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication in Business,49, 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R. (2012b). Tales of time, terms and patient information-seeking behaviour—An exploratory qualitative study. Health Communication,27(7), 682–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R., & Cartmill, J. (2016). Talking their way to success: Communicative competence for international medical graduates in transition. Medical Education,50(10), 992–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R., & Yates, L. (2013). English for the workplace: Doing patient-centred care in medical communication. TESL Canada Journal,30(7), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R., Ogden, K., Yates, L., Rooney, K., & Sheldon, B. (2015a). Enhancing international medical graduates’ communication: The contribution of applied linguistics. Medical Education,49(8), 828–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, M. R., O’Grady, C., Yates, L., & Rogers, P. (2015b). Into the spotlight: Exploring the use of dictaphone during surgical consultations. Health Communication,30(5), 513–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.894603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2017). Medical workforce 2016 factsheet. https://hwd.health.gov.au/webapi/customer/documents/factsheets/2016/Medical%20workforce%20factsheet%202016.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • Dorgan, K. A., Lang, F., Floyd, M., & Kemp, E. (2009). International medical graduate-patient communication: A qualitative analysis of perceived barriers. Academic Medicine,84(11), 1567–1575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P., & Wenger, E. (2005). Communities of practice in sociolinguistics: What is the role of power in sociolinguistic variation? Journal of Sociolinguistics,9(4), 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, K., Spittal, M. J., & Studdert, D. M. (2012). Risks of complaints and adverse disciplinary findings against international medical graduates in Victoria and Western Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia,197(8), 448–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. M. (2000). The science of patient-centered care. Journal of Family Practice,49(9), 805–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadlow, J., & Pitts, M. (1991). The understanding of common health terms by doctors, nurses and patients. Social Science and Medicine,32(2), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., Harrigan, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Nonverbal behavior in clinician-patient interaction. Applied and Preventive Psychology,4(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80049-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J., Oxman, T., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Rapport expressed through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,9(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00987141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K., & Adolphs, S. (2012). Discourse and healthcare. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 470–481). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudak, P. L., & Maynard, D. W. (2011). An interactional approach to conceptualising small talk in medical interactions. Sociology of Health and Illness,33(4), 634–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. (2012). Interactional sociolinguistics and discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 135–146). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, T., & Bhopal, J. S. (2009). The patient-centred interview and international medical graduates: A preliminary view. British Columbia Medical Journal,51(6), 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramsch, C. J. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., Seow, A., Luo, N., & Koh, D. (2008). Attitudes towards the doctor-patient relationship: A prospective study in an Asian medical school. Medical Education,42(11), 1092–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A., & Sacrino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture,1(1), 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, P., Henderson, D., Tamargo, J., & Holewa, H. A. (2012). Doctor-patient communication issues for international medical graduates: Research findings from Australia. Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice,25(1), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadors, J. D., & Murray, C. B. (2014). Measuring nonverbal bias through body language responses to stereotypes. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,38(2), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalski, K., Farhan, N., Motschall, E., Vach, W., & Boeker, M. (2017). Dealing with foreign cultural paradigms: A systematic review on intercultural challenges of international medical graduates. PLoS ONE,12(7), e0181330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Chaudhary, R. (2013). Patients’ attitudes towards privacy in a Nepalese public hospital: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Research Notes,6(1), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD.Stat. (2017). Health workforce migration. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=68337. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.

  • O’Grady, C. (2011). Teaching the communication of empathy in patient-centred medicine. In B. Hoekje & S. Tipton (Eds.), English language and the medical profession: Instructing and assessing the communication skills of international physicians (pp. 43–72). Emerald: Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotto, L. S., Duncan, G. F., & Anderson-Wurf, J. (2007). Issues for clinicians training international medical graduates: A systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia,187(4), 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pluut, B. (2016). Differences that matter: Developing critical insights into discourses of patient-centeredness. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,19(4), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragan, S. (2000). Sociable talk in women’s health care contexts: Two forms of non-medical talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 269–287). Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S. (2005). Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Medical Education,39(6), 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02171.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Wass, V., Jones, R., Sarangi, S., & Gillett, A. (2003). A discourse analysis study of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ communication in an OSCE: A proposed new framework for teaching students. Medical Education,37(3), 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, J. R., Murray, J., & Hobbs, F. D. R. (1999). Imprecision in medical communication: Study of a doctor talking to patients with serious illness. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,92, 620–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., & Freeman, T. R. (2003). Patient-centered medicine: Transforming the clinical method (2nd ed.). Oxon: Radcliffe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, R. L. (2003). Communication in medical encounters: An ecological perspective. In T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 63–89). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, A. L., Markakis, K., Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. (1997). A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. Journal of the American Medical Association,277(8), 678–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D., & Wallat, C. (1987). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly,50(2), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics,4(2), 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L. S., Cassada, D. C., Ergen, W. F., & Goldman, M. H. (2009). Setting the stage: Surgery patients’ expectations for greetings during routine office visits. Journal of Surgical Research,157(1), 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (2005). Negotiating an institutional identity: Individual differences in NS and NNS teacher directives. In K. Bardovi-Harlig & B. Hartford (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics: Exploring institutional talk (pp. 67–99). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures (pp. 287–308). New York: De Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (2015). Intercultural communication and the transnational: Managing impressions at work. Multilingua,34(6), 773–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L., & Dahm, M. R. (2016). Doing patient-centred consultations: Some challenges for IMGs. In S. J. White & J. Cartmill (Eds.), Communication in surgical practice (pp. 35–67). New York: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria R. Dahm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dahm, M.R., Yates, L. (2020). Rapport, Empathy and Professional Identity: Some Challenges for International Medical Graduates Speaking English as a Second or Foreign Language. In: Hohenstein, C., Lévy-Tödter, M. (eds) Multilingual Healthcare. FOM-Edition(). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27120-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics