Skip to main content

The Wicked Problem of Long Term Radioactive Waste Governance

Ten Characteristics of a Complex Technical and Societal Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance

Abstract

The disposal of high-level radioactive waste deals with new challenges that can be classified as wicked problems. In the following, the article presents ten central characteristics of wicked problems linking them to political, economic and social challenges associated with siting and the disposal of radioactive waste. The ten characteristics are:

The national context (1), as wicked problems are determined by the political, social and cultural background of a country; the changing narratives (2), as a wicked problem can never be explained solely by objective facts; the socio-technical challenge (3), as a blueprint for solving a wicked problem does not exist; the double jeopardy situation (4), as a repository poses dangers to the protection of people and the environment; the systemic risk (5), as inherent, technical, institutional and human factors intertwine; the vast time scales (6), as the wicked problem of siting is only understood once the search process is completed; the linked layers (7), as wicked problems can be attributed to different levels of actions; the landscape of conflicting actors (8), as differences in ideologies and interests provoke conflicts; the boundaries of science (9), as a wicked problem must be interand transdisciplinarily managed; the challenged democracy (10), as transparency and participatory procedures go beyond classical representative forms of democracy. In the end, the ten characteristics are structured into three core dimensions; physical, technical and social problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AkEnd (2002). Auswahlverfahren für Endlagerstandorte. Empfehlung des Arbeitskreises Auswahlverfahren Endlagerstandorte, https://www.bundestag.de/endlager-archiv/blob/28-1906/c1fb38 60506631de51b9f1f689b7664c/kmat_01_akend-data.pdf, last accessed 25 February 2019, Köln.

  • Altvater, E. (2014). Der nukleare Dreck muss weg oder: Ohne Externalitäten keine kapitalistische Modern. In: Brunnengräber, A. and Di Nucci, M. R. (Eds.): Im Hürdenlauf zur Energiewende. Von Transformationen, Reformen und Innovationen, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 401-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, D. and Kreusch, J. (2012). Sicherheitstechnische und gesellschaftliche Aspekte von Monitoring bei der Endlagerung radioaktiver Abfälle mit Option ihrer Rückholbarkeit. In: Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 21(3), 52-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. S. (2008). Wicked Problems and Applied Economics. In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(5), 1176–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmans, A.; Elam, M.; Kos, D.; Polič, M.; Simmons, P.; Sundqvist, G. and Walls, J. (2008). Wanting the Unwanted: Effects of Public and Stakeholder Involvement in the Long-Term Management of Radioactive Waste and the Siting of Repository Facilities. Final Report CARLProject.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowers, A. (2007). Nuclear Waste and landscapes of risk. In: Landscape Research, 24(3), 241-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blowers, A. (2016). The Legacy of Nuclear Power, Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brans, M.; Ferraro, G. and von Estorff, U. (2015). The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency’s Forum on Stakeholder Confidence, radioactive waste management and public participation. A synthesis of its learnings and guiding principles European Commission, Joint Research Centre. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC97499, last accessed 25 February 2019.

  • Brunnengräber, A. (2019). Ewigkeitslasten. Die “Endlagerung” radioktiver Abfälle als soziales, politisches und wissenschaftliches Projekt (2nd Edition), Baden Baden: edition sigma in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A.; Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Mez, L. and Schreurs, M. (Eds.) (2018). Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume II), Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A. and Görg, C. (2017). Nuclear Waste in the Anthropocene. Uncertainties and Unforeseeable Time Scales in the Disposal of Nuclear Waste. In: GAIA, 26(2), 96-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A. (2016). Das wicked Problem der Endlagerung. Zehn Charakteristika des komplexen Umgangs mit hochradioaktiven Reststoffen. In: Brunnengräber, A. (Eds.) (2016). Problemfalle Endlager. Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Atommüll, Baden-Baden: edition sigma in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 145-166.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A.; Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Mez, L. and Schreurs, M. (Eds.) (2015):.Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume I), Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A. and Hocke, P. (2014). Bewegung Pro-Endlager? Zum soziotechnischen Umgang mit hochradioaktiven Reststoffen. In: Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 27(4), 59-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, L. (2009). Does the polysemic nature of energy security make it a ‘wicked’ problem? International Conference in Energy, Environment, Sustainable Development. Ardil, C. Paris, France: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology WASET, 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P. J. (2011). Die Geologie der Menschheit. In: Crutzen, Paul J. et al. (Eds.) (2011). Das Raumschiff Erde hat keinen Notausgang, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 7-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Schreurs, M.; Brunnengräber, A. and Mez, L. (2018). The Technical, Political and Socio-Economic Challenges of Governing Nuclear Waste. A Comparative Perspective. In: Brunnengräber, A.; Di Nucci, M. R.; Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Mez, L. and Schreurs, M. (Eds.) (2018): Challenges of Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume II), Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nucci, M. R. and Brunnengräber, A. (2017). In whose backyard? The wicked problem of siting nuclear waste repositories. In: European Policy Analysis, 3 (2), 295-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nucci, M. R. and Isidoro Losada, A. M. (2015). The International and EU Framework: An Open Door for Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Export and Multinational Waste Repositories? In: Brunnengräber, A. et al. (Eds.) (2015). Governance of Nuclear Waste Management: An International Comparison, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 79-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nucci, M. R.; Brunnengräber, A. and Isidoro Losada, A. M. (2017). From the „right to know” to the „right to object” and “decide”. A comparative perspective on participation in siting procedures for high level waste repositories. In: Progress in Nuclear Energy, 100(2017), 316-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, K.; Engels, B.; Pye, O. and Brunnengräber, A. (Eds.) (2014). The Political Ecology of Agrofuels, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, A. and Rippe, K. P. (2016): Risiko und Ungewissheit? - Bei der Entsorgung hochradioaktiver Abfälle, Zürich: vdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, P. (2014). Citizen Science. Das unterschätzte Wissen der Laien, München: oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (2011): EURATOM und die Energiewende. Szenarien für die Zukunft des europäischen Atomvertrages, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), SWP-Arbeitspapier 03. Berlin. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/arbeitspapiere/EURATOM_und_die_Energiewende_KS.pdf, last accessed 25 Feburary 2019.

  • Giddens, A. (1996). Konsequenzen der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görg, C. (2016). Zwischen Tagesgeschäft und Erdgeschichte. Die unterschiedlichen Zeitskalen in der Debatte um das Anthropozän. In: GAIA, 25(1), 9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haff, P. (2014). Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules. In: The Anthropocene Review, 1(2), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häfner, D. (2016). Screening der Akteure im Bereich der Endlagerstandortsuche für hoch radioaktive Reststoffe in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Das “Who is who” eines sich verändernden Konfliktfeldes. (ENTRIA-Arbeitsbericht 04), Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocke-Bergler, P.; Gallego, D.; Kallenbach, B. and Fischer-Appelt, K. (2016). Partizipation im Standortauswahlverfahren für ein Endlager, Deutsche Arbeitsgemeinschaft Endlagerforschung (DAEF). https://www.bundestag.de/blob/419710/d535ca62c1bf716183a3030321181e2f/kmat_59-data.pdf, last accessed 25 February 2019.

  • Isidoro Losada, A. M. (2016). Nuklearer Kolonialismus. Atommüll und die Persistenz quasikolonialer Logiken. In: Brunnengräber A (Eds.) (2016). Problemfalle Endlager. Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Atommüll, Baden-Baden: edition sigma in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 313-336.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isidoro Losada, A. M.; Themann, D. and Di Nucci, M. R. (2019). Experts and Politics in the German Nuclear Waste Governance. Advisory Bodies between Ambition and Reality. In: Brunnengräber, A. and Di Nucci, M. R. (Eds.) (2019). Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance, Volume III, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 231-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. J. (2010). Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future. In: Environmental Law and Policy Annual Review, 10749-10756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, M. (2015). Megaproject Underway. Governance of Nuclear Waste Management in France. In: Brunnengräber et al. (2015). Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume I), Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 117-138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K.; Cashore, B.; Bernstein, S. and Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. In: Policy Sciences, 45, 123-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerron, G. (2015). Multiple Challenges. Nuclear Waste Governance in the United Kingdom. In: Brunnengräber et al. (2015). Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison (Volume I), Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 101-116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mez, L. (2006). Zur Endagerfrage und der nicht stattfindenden sozialwissenschaftlichen Endlagerforschung in Deutschland. In: Hocke, P. and Grunwald, A. (Eds.) (2006). Wohin mit dem radioaktiven Abfall? Perspektiven für eine sozialwissenschaftliche Endlagerforschung, Berlin: edition sigma, 37-52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NEA (2015). Stakeholder Involvement in Decision Making: A Short Guide to Issues, Approaches and Resources, Nuclear Energy Agency, OECD. Paris. https://www.oecd-nea.org/rwm/-pubs/2015/7189-stakeholder-involvement-2015.pdf, last accessed 25 February 2019.

  • Popp, M. (2006). Die unklare nukleare Entsorgung. Persönliche Remineszenzen und Reflexionen. In: Hocke, P. and Grunwald, A. (Eds.) (2006). Wohin mit dem radioaktiven Abfall? Perspektiven für eine sozialwissenschaftliche Endlagerforschung, Berlin: edition sigma, 53-62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Radkau, J. and Hahn, L. (2013). Aufstieg und Fall der deutschen Atomwirtschaft, München: oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2011). Wissen und Moral – Stadien der Risikowahrnehmung. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ), 61 (46-47), 3-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. In: Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, D. (2008). Anti-Atomkraftbewegung. In: Roth, R. and Rucht, D. (Eds.): Die sozialen Bewegungen in Deutschland seit 1945: ein Handbuch, Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 246-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • StandAG (2017). Site Selection Act (Standortauswahlgesetz 2017). BGBl. I S. 1074, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/standag_2017/BJNR107410017.html, last accessed on 21 February 2019.

  • Smeddinck, U.; Kuppler, S. and Chaudry, S. (Eds.) (2016). Inter- und Transdisziplinarität bei der Entsorgung radioaktiver Reststoffe, Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeddinck, U. and Roßegger, U. (2013). Partizipation bei der Entsorgung radioaktiver Reststoffe – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Standortauswahlgesetzes. In: Natur und Recht, 35(8), 548-556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stierstadt, K. (2010). Atommüll - wohin damit? Frankfurt am Main: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Harri Deutsch GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatham, P. and Houghton, L. (2011). The wicked problem of humanitarian logistics and disaster relief aid. In: Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Managementk, 1(1), 15-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Themann, D.; Brunnengräber, A. (2019). The nuclear legacy in the Anthropocene: interrelation between nature, technology and society. In: Hickmann, T.; Partzsch, L.; Pattberg, P. and Weiland, S. (Eds.) (2018): The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science, London and New York: Routledge, Research in Global Environmental Governance, 182-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verweij, M. and Thompson, M. (2011). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: governance, politics and plural perceptions, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, A. (2007). Die Welt ohne uns: Reise über eine unbevölkerte Erde, München: Piper Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WSSR (2013): World Social Science Report 2013, Changing Global Environments. Produced by the International Social Science Council (ISSC) and UNESCO, and published by the OECD, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203419-en; Paris.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achim Brunnengräber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brunnengräber, A. (2019). The Wicked Problem of Long Term Radioactive Waste Governance. In: Brunnengräber, A., Di Nucci, M. (eds) Conflicts, Participation and Acceptability in Nuclear Waste Governance. Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27107-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics