Skip to main content

Policy or Office? The determinants of programmatic change in West European political parties

Abstract

Although it is undisputed in the literature that parties’ policy positions move, it is much less clear what actually moves parties. In our paper, we seek to advance the debate on programmatic change in political parties theoretically as well as empirically. We start out by theoretically discussing the relevance of policy-seeking vs. office-seeking with regard to the programmatic positions of parties. This allows us to develop hypotheses regarding the timing and direction of programmatic change. We then move on to test these hypotheses empirically. We present results from comparative case studies of the two most important parties in four West European countries (Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom), which are characterized by dramatically different party systems. We show that in most cases considerations regarding office-seeking rather than lack of policy success drive programmatic change. This is because the incentives resulting from a (long-lasting) exclusion from government are usually much more unambiguous than a lack of policy success since a lack of success at elections or in the coalition game are directly related to a party’s programmatic position while the reasons for disappointing policy performances can usually be sought elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_28
  • Chapter length: 18 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-658-27043-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow. 2004. “Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?” British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 589-610.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513-529.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, James, Andrea B. Haupt, and Heather Stoll. 2009. “What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (5): 611-639.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 1989. “Sozialdemokratie am Ende? Die Entwicklung der Macht sozialdemokratischer Parteien im internationalen Vergleich 1945-1988.“ Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 18 (4): 321-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus. 2013. “Austeritätspolitik: Was Parteien bewirken und Märkte mögen.“ In Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie, edited by Klaus Armingeon, 113-137. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann, and David Weisstanner. 2016. “Choosing the Path of Austerity: How Parties and Policy Coalitions Influence Welfare State Retrenchment in Periods of Fiscal Consolidation.” West European Politics 39 (4): 628-647.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, Tim. 2011. The Conservative Party. From Thatcher to Cameron. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Robert. 2010. The Conservative Party from Peel to Major. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, Lawrence Ezrow, and Michael D. McDonald. 2010. “Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Chance: An Integrated Dynamic Theory.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (4): 781-804.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, Brian. 2012. “Partisan Embedding of Liberalism: How Trade, Investment, and Immigration Affect Party Support for the Welfare State.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (5): 606-635.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, Ivor, and Donald Searing. 1988. “Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party.” American Political Science Review 82 (2): 361-384.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, Peter. 1999. The Major Premiership. Politics and Policies under John Major, 1990-97. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, Peter, Mark Garnett, and Andrew Denham. 2011. From Crisis to Coalition. The Conservative Party, 1997-2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Fraser. 2007. “‘Lately, Things just don’t Seem the Same’. External Shocks, Party Change and the Adaptation of the Dutch Christian Democrats during ‘Purple Hague’ 1994-8.” Party Politics 13 (1): 69-87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine De Vries, Marco Steenbergen, and Erica Edwards. 2011. “Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?” Party Politics 17 (3): 275-301.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerholm, Andreas. 2016. “Why Do Political Parties Change their Policy Positions? A Review.” Political Studies Review 14 (4): 501–511.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Franzmann, Simon, and André Kaiser. 2006. “Locating Political Parties in Policy Space. A Reanalysis of Party Manifesto Data.” Party Politics 12 (2): 163-181.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John, and David Willetts. 1997. Is Conservatism Dead? London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. The Politics of Justification. Party Competition and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Kees van Kersbergen. 2002. “The Politics of the ‘Third Way’. The Transformation of Social Democracy in Denmark and the Netherlands.” Party Politics 8 (5): 507-524.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State. The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275-296.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 373-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmel, Robert, and Kenneth Janda. 1994. “An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (3): 259-287.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, Anke, and Christof Schiller. 2010. Der Fall Hartz IV. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haupt, Andrea B. 2010. “Parties’ Responses to Economic Globalization. What is Left for the Left and Right for the Right?” Party Politics 16 (1): 5-27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, Richard. 2001. New Labour and Thatcherism. Political Change in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillebrand, Ron, and Galen A. Irwin. 1999. “Changing Strategies: The Dilemma of the Dutch Labour Party.” In Policy, Office, or Vote? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 112-140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerwerf, Andries. 1999. “Policy Successes and Failures of the First Purple Cabinet.” Acta Politica 34 (2-3): 158-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef. 2011. “Conceptualizing Left and Right in Comparative Politics: Towards a Deductive Approach.” Party Politics 17 (6): 745-765.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, Dennis. 1997. The Reordering of British Politics. Politics after Thatcher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keman, Hans. 2011. “Third Ways and Social Democracy: The Right Way to Go?” British Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 671-680.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 1981. “Politics, Economics, and the Trade Unions, 1974-1979.” In Britain at the Polls, 1979. A Study of the General Election, edited by Howard Penniman, 30-94. Washington/London: AEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. “Partisan Competition and Welfare State Retrenchment. When Do Politicians Choose Unpopular Policies?” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 265-302. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laver, Michael, and Peter Mair. 1999. “Party Policy and Cabinet Portfolios in the Netherlands, 1998: Results from an Expert Survey.” Acta Politica 34 (1): 49-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Nigel. 1992. The View from No. 11. Memoirs of a Tory Radical. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. Party Competition between Unequals Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Thomas M. 2013. Constraints on Party Policy Change. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, and Joni Lovenduski. 2004. “Why Parties Fail to Learn. Electoral Defeat, Selective Perception and British Party Politics.” Party Politics 10 (1): 85-104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Philip. 1993. “The Conservative Party from Thatcher to Major.” In Britain at the Polls 1992, edited by Anthony King, Philip Norton, David Denver, Patrick Seyd, and Ivor Crewe, 29-69. Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Helene H. 2012. “What do Parties Want? Policy versus Office.” West European Politics 35 (4): 896-910.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Raschke, Joachim. 2010. “Zerfallsphase des Schröder-Zyklus. Die SPD 2005-2009.” In Die zweite Große Koalition. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel, 2005-2009, edited by Christoph Egle and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 69-98. Wiesbaden: VS.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Josef. 2007. “Die CDU nach 2005: Von Wahl zu Wahl – und doch kein Wandel?” In Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2005, edited by Oskar Niedermayer, 67-82. Opladen: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Gijs, and Nathalie Giger. 2017. “Do Leadership-dominated Parties Change More?” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28 (3): 349-360.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine E. de Vries, and Barbara Vis. 2013. “Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 464–477.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Gijs, Marc van de Wardt, Barbara Vis, and Michael Baggesen Klitgaard. 2015. “How Aspiration to Office Conditions the Impact of Government Participation on Party Platform Change.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 1040–1054.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, Roger. 1996. The Conservative Idea of Community. London: Conservative 2000 Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyd, Patrick. 1993. “Labour. The Great Transformation.” In Britain at the Polls 1992, edited by Anthony King, Philip Norton, David Denver, Patrick Seyd, and Ivor Crewe, 70-100. Chatham: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. “Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Chance.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 238-248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller. 1999. “Political Parties and Hard Choices.” In Policy, Office, or Vote? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 1-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavits, Margit. 2007. “Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 151-165.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, Arco, and Rudy B. Andeweg. 2000. “The Netherlands. Still the Politics of Accommodation?” In Coalition Governments in Western Europe, edited by Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm, 356-398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Holsteyn, Joop J.M., and Galen A. Irwin. 2003. “Never a Dull Moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch Parliamentary Election of 2002.” West European Politics 26 (2): 41-66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Kersbergen, Kees. 2008. “The Christian Democratic Phoenix and Modern Unsecular Politics.” Party Politics 14 (3): 259-279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Kersbergen, Kees, and André Krouwel. 2006. “De veranderde beleidsfilosofie van het CDA van Balkenende.” In Vier jaar Balkenende, edited by Frans Becker, Wim van Hennekeler, and Menno Hurenkamp, 38-53. Amsterdam: Mets & Schilts.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Alemann, Ulrich, and Tim Spier. 2008. ”Doppelter Einsatz, halber Sieg? Die SPD und die Bundestagswahl 2005.“ In Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2005, edited by Oskar Niedermayer, 37-65. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, Stefaan, and Michiel Nuytemans. 2009. “Friction and Party Manifesto Change in 25 Countries, 1945-98.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 190-206.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Hugh, Lawrence Ezrow, and Han Dorussen. 2011. “Globalization, Party Positions, and the Median Voter.” World Politics 63 (3): 509–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Widfeldt, Anders. 2007. “The Swedish Parliamentary Election of 2006.” Electoral Studies 26 (4): 820-823.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Widfeldt, Anders, and Jon Pierre. 1995. “Sweden.” European Journal of Political Research 28 (3-4): 477-485.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wolinetz, Steven B. 1995. “Internal Politics and Rates of Change in the Partij van de Arbeid, 1957-1994.” Jaarboek Documentatiecentrum Nederlands Politieke Partijen 1995: 113-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2003. “Partisan Politics, Party Competition and Veto Players: German Economic Policy in the Kohl Era.” Journal of Public Policy 23 (2): 123-156.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2004. “Destination Anywhere? The German Red-Green Government’s Inconclusive Search for a Third Way in Economic Policy.” German Politics 13 (1): 106-131.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2010. “New Possibilities or Permanent Gridlock? The Policies and Politics of the Grand Coalition.” In Germany after the Grand Coalition. Governance and Politics in a Turbulent Environment, edited by Silvia Bolgherini, and Florian Grotz, 15-30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zolleis, Udo, and Julia Bartz. 2010. “Die CDU in der Großen Koalition – Unbestimmt erfolgreich.“ In Die zweite Große Koalition. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel, 2005-2009, edited by Christoph Egle and Reimut Zohlnhöfer, 51-68. Wiesbaden: VS.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reimut Zohlnhöfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zohlnhöfer, R., Bandau, F. (2020). Policy or Office? The determinants of programmatic change in West European political parties. In: Careja, R., Emmenegger, P., Giger, N. (eds) The European Social Model under Pressure. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27043-8_28

Download citation