Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

This chapter provides a critical review of literature on the intersection of law and collective memory. It synthesizes common themes, identifies gaps, and suggests future directions. Existing research reveals a dialectical relationship where law and collective memories are mutually constitutive. Future research should investigate how global, national and local contexts mediate this relationship, and how the law-memory nexus manifests itself at the micro-level of legal consciousness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 339.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adjemian, Boris. 2012. Le débat inachevé des historiens français sur les ‘lois mémorielles’ et la pénalisation du négationnisme: retour sur une décienne de controverse. Revue arménienne des questions contemporaines 15: 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. On the social construction of moral universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. In Cultural trauma and collective identity, eds. J. C. Alexander et al., 196–263. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Alejandro, and Natan Sznaider. 2016. Memory and forgetting in the post-Holocaust era: The ethics of never again. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, Lawrie. 2003. Unreconstructed democracy: W. E. B. Du Bois and the case for reparations. American Political Science Review 97(1): 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belavusau, Uladzislau, and Aleksandra Gliszczynska-Grabias, eds. 2017. Law and memory: Towards legal governance of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, Peter. 2011. Juridical exceptionalism in Australia. Griffith Law Review 20(2): 271–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Lucy. 2015. Frames of memory after 9/11: Culture, criticism, politics, and law. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, W. James. 2001. The unforgotten: Memories of justice. American Political Science Review 95(4): 777–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borneman, John. 1997. Settling accounts: Violence, justice, and accountability in postsocialist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Carolyn P. 2008. The politics of history and memory in democratic Spain. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 617: 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Kirsten. 2013. The laws of memory: The ICTY, the archive, and transitional justice. Social & Legal Studies 22(2): 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, David, and Ashley Rondini. 2017. Legacies of racial contention: Implementing Mississippi’s civil rights/human rights curriculum, 2006–2011. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 14(1): 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Lawrence. 2001. The memory of judgment: Making law and history in the trials of the Holocaust. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, Costas. 2012. History trials: Can law decide history? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8(1): 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray J. 1985. The symbolic uses of politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, Roger. 2009. The ‘Stasi records’, the public and collective memories: The inspection of personal records. In Legal institutions and collective memories, ed. Susanne Karstedt, 329–340. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournet, Caroline. 2007. The crime of destruction and the law of genocide | their impact on collective memory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, Marc. 2002. Righting old wrongs. In Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law and repair, ed. Martha Minow, 107–131. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, Mary J., and Harry M. Rhea. 2010. Collective memory, international law, and restorative social processes after conflagration: The Holocaust. International Criminal Justice Review 20(3): 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold. 1956. Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61(5): 420–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibian, Sévane. 2012. Droit, histoire, mémoire. Le négationnisme: exercise d’une liberté ou violation d’un droit? Revue arménienne des questions contemporaines 15: 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, Yifat. 2016. Memory laws: An escalation in minority exclusion or a testimony to the limits of state power? Law & Society Review 50(3): 575–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting war crimes in The Hague Tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, Maurice. 1992. On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick, Ellie, and Haley Duschinski. 2018. Enduring injustice: Memory politics and Namibia’s genocide reparations movement. Memory Studies 11(4):437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Fredrick C. 2002. Collective memory, collective action, and black activism in the 1960s. In Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law, and repair, ed. Martha Minow. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, Eric. 2017. Epilogue: Beyond ‘memory laws’: Towards a general theory of law and historical discourse. In Law and memory: Towards legal governance of history, eds. Uladzislau Belavusau and Aleksandra Gliszczynska-Grabias, 413–434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, Nicola. 2012. War and rape: Law, memory and justice. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhn, Sabine. 2010. International justice and reconciliation in Namibia: The ICC submission and public memory. African Affairs 109(436): 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, Valerie, and Ryken Grattet. 2001. Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Robert A. 2000. Rebuttal versus unmasking: Legal strategies in R. v. Zundel. Patterns of Prejudice. 34(3): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalberg, Stephen. 1994. Max Weber’s historical-comparative methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karstedt, Susanne. 2009. Legal institutions and collective memories. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Ryan D. 2005. When law and society disagree: Group threat, legacies of the past, and the organizational context of hate crime law enforcement. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klymenko, Lina. 2016. The Holodomor law and national trauma construction in Ukraine. Canadian Slavonic Papers 58(4): 341–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koposov, Nikolay. 2017. Memory laws, memory wars: The politics of the past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwibuka, Eugène. 2018. Parliament passes law against genocide ideology. The New Times | Rwanda, July 11. https://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/parliament-law-genocide-ideology

  • Landsman, Stephan. 2005. Crimes of the Holocaust: The Law Confronts Hard Cases. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, Larry. 2006. Truth, error, and criminal law: An essay in legal epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lessa, Francesca. 2013. Memory and transitional justice in Argentina and Uruguay: Against impunity. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Daniel, and Natan Sznaider. 2006. The Holocaust and memory in the global age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Daniel, and Natan Sznaider. 2010. Human rights and memory. University Park: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Wenjie. 2015. Remembering the faces of law: Legal consciousness and collective memories in transitional China. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mälksoo, Lauri. 2003. Illegal annexation and state continuity: The case of the incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR: A study of the tension between normativity and power in international law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, Kieran. 2007. Beyond legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society 34(4): 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, Cheryl. 2003. Building a postcolonial archive? Gender, collective memory and citizenship in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies 29(3): 739–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, Ethan. 2007. Climbing the dispute Pagoda: Grievances and appeals to the official justice system in Rural China. American Sociological Review 72(3): 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry, Hemi. 2015. The paradox of dissent: Judicial dissent and the projects of international criminal justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13(3): 449–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, Barbara A. 2003. Durkheim on collective memory. Journal of Classical Sociology 3(2): 123–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Klaus, and Janna Thompson. 2015. Historical justice and memory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, Patrick. 2012. Collective memory in law and policy: The problem of the sovereign debt crisis. Legal Studies 32(4): 642–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olick, Jeffrey K. 1999. Genre memories and memory genres: A dialogical analysis of May 8, 1945 commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Sociological Review 64(3): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osiel, Mark J. 1997. Mass atrocities, collective memory, and the law. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendas, Devin. 2006. The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, 1963–1965: Genocide, history, and the limits of the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, Francesca. 1998. Legacies and liabilities of an insurgent past: Remembering Martin Luther King, Jr., on the house and senate floor. Social Science History 22(4): 479–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Arnold M. 1968. Libel and academic freedom. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, Barrie. 2018. History of trial: Historical narrative pluralism within and beyond international criminal courts. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 67(03): 547–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2015. Representing mass violence: Conflicting responses to human rights violations in Darfur. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J. 2017. Formal and substantive rationality in Max Weber’s sociology of law: Tensions in international criminal law. In Law as culture: Max Weber’s comparative sociology of law, ed. Werner Gephart, 493–510. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Ryan D. King. 2005. Institutionalizing collective memories of hate: Law and law enforcement in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology 111(2): 579–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Ryan D. King. 2007. Law and collective memory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 189–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Ryan D. King. 2011. American memories: Atrocities and the law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, Joachim J., and Hollie Nyseth Brehm. 2015. Representing human rights violations in Darfur: Global justice, national distinctions. American Journal of Sociology 121(2): 564–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheppele, Kim L. 2009. Constitutional interpretation after regimes of horror. In Legal institutions and collective memories, ed. Susanne Karstedt, 233–258. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard, and Jacqueline Scott. 1989. Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review 54: 359–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Barry. 1982. The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory. Social Forces 61(2): 374–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, Kathryn, and Hun Joon Kim. 2013. The justice cascade: The origins and effectiveness of prosecutions of human rights violations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9(1): 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony D. 1999. Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Philip. 2008. Punishment and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, Noam, and Amit Schejter. 2015. ‘I will perpetuate your memory through all generations’: Institutionalization of collective memory by law in Israel. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 11(1): 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, John. 2001. ‘Making whole what has been smashed’: Reflections on reparations. The Journal of Modern History 73: 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrdoljak, Ana F. 2009. Human rights and genocide: The work of Lauterpacht and Lemkin in modern international law. European Journal of International Law 20(4): 1163–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, Robin, and Barry Schwartz. 1991. The Vietnam veterans’ memorial: Commemorating a difficult past. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 376–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahutu, J. Siguru. 2017. ‘In the case of Africa in general, there is a tendency to exaggerate’: Representing mass atrocity in Africa. Media, Culture and Society 39(6): 919–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zheng. 2014. Never forget national humiliation: Historical memory in Chinese politics and foreign relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlinger, Claire. 2015. From commemoration to conviction: Prosecuting Edgar Ray Killen for the ‘Mississippi burning’ murders. Race and Justice 5(2): 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Richard Ashby. 2011. Writing history in international criminal trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjie Liao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liao, W., Savelsberg, J.J. (2023). Law. In: Sebald, G., et al. Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Gedächtnisforschung . Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26587-8_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26587-8_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26586-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26587-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics