Abstract
The article is devoted to the views of Russian researchers on the concept of “precarious employment”, the search for an answer to the question with seeking an answer to the question as to what features can be regarded as reasons for considering working relations as precarious. The article discusses the different criteria for precarious employment, taking into account Russian peculiarities and other aspects of the concept of precarious employment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The statements are taken from interviews.
References
Bandyukova, T. S. (2004). Odd jobs in Russia: Quantity, contents, mobility. Moscow: SA HSE. Preprint WP3/2004/05.
Bizyukov, P. V. (2013). Practice of Regulating Labour Relations under the Conditions of Precarious Employment. Moscow: ANO “Centre of Social and Labour Rights”.
Bobkov, V. N. (Ed.). (2014). Social policy, standard and quality of living: Dictionary. Moscow: All-Russia Centre of Standard of Living.
Bobkov V. N. (2017). Project “Precarity of employment in the Russian Federation: State and Trends of Decline”. In V. N.Bobkov (Ed.) Precarious employment: Global and Russian contexts of the future of work, Moscow: Publishing House “RealPrint”.
Bobkov, V. N., Kvachev, V. G., & Loktukhina N. V. (2016). Precarious employment: Economic and social genesis of the concept. In Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta (Herald of Voronezh State University). Economy and Management (№ 4, pp. 81–86).
Bobkov, V. N., Kvachev, V. G., & Loktukhina, N. V. (2017). Criterion, probability and degree of precarity taking into account the peculiarities of the Russian labour market. Economy of the Region, 3, 81–86.
Corsini, R., & Auerbach, A. (2006). Operational definition. In Psychological encyclopedia. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.
Labour Code of the Russian Federation. (30. December 2001). № 197-FL. Access by “Consultant Plus”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34683/. Accessed 1 Sept 2018.
Martynova, O. V. (2016). Teleworking in Russia and prospects for development. Young Researcher, 2, 542–545.
Official site of the Federal State Statistics Service. (2018). www.gks.ru. Accessed 1 Sept 2018.
Ozhegov, S. I., & Shvedova, N. Yu. (1996). Explanatory dictionary of the Russian Language (3rd ed.). Moscow: Publishing house Az.
Panov, A. M. (2016). Precarious employment: Conceptualization of the notion and the appreciation criteria. Problems of Territorial Development, 3(33), 1–11.
Sankova, L. V. (2014). Precarity of employment in modern economy: System risk or “Special” form of flexibilization. Standard of Living of the Population of Regions of Russia, 4(194), 44–53.
Sidorina, T Yu. (2007). The Man and his job: From the past into the informational age. Social Sciences and Modernity, 3, 32–43.
Strebkov, D. O., & Shevchuk, A. V. (2010). Freelancers at the Russian Labour Market. Sociological Research, 2, 45–55.
Yakovlev, R. A. (2014). Precarious Employment and Regulation of Minimal Salar. Standard of Living of the Population of regions of Russia, 4(194), 8–17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loktyukhina, N. (2020). Precarious Employment: Definition of the Concept Given by Russian Researchers. In: Bobkov, V., Herrmann, P. (eds) Digitisation and Precarisation. Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26384-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26384-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26383-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26384-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)