Agony at a Distance: Investigating Digital Witnessing on YouTube

  • Johanna SumialaEmail author
Part of the Ethik in mediatisierten Welten book series (EMW)


In this chapter, I analyze the media ethics of digital witnessing by elaborating the theoretical work on media witnessing carried out by media scholars such as John Durham Peters, John Ellis, Paul Frosh, Amit Pinchevski and Lilie Chouliaraki. I focus on digital witnessing on YouTube and analyze in detail one particular YouTube video clip. This video clip entitled “For our son” was made by the father of a Finnish school shooter and was posted on YouTube in 2008. The empirical analysis of digital witnessing is based on the thematic close reading of the media material and is structured around the three key elements in media witnessing: (i) ordinary people as witnessing agents on YouTube, (ii) YouTube videos as a representation of witnessing and (iii) viewers as bearing witness. In conclusion, I discuss the ideas of responsibility as agony and the sense of proper distance as necessary conditions for the communicative action of bearing digital witness.


Digital witnessing YouTube School shootings Intimacy Distant suffering Agony 


  1. Arendt, H. (1990 [1958]). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashuri, T., & Pinchevski, A. (2009). Witnessing as a field. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 133–157). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1988). Selected writings. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant suffering: Morality, media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Chouliaraki, L. (2010). Ordinary witnessing in post-television news: Towards a new moral imagination. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chouliaraki, L. (2011). “Improper distance”: Towards a critical account of solidarity as irony. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, J. (2009). Mundane witness. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 73–88). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frosh, P. (2009). Telling presences: Witnessing, mass media, and the imagined lives of strangers. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 49–72). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frosh, P., & Pinchevski, A. (2009). Introduction. Why media witnessing? Why now? In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 1–19). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grusin, R. (2009). YouTube at the end of new media. In P. Snickars & P. Vonderau (Eds.), The YouTube reader (pp. 60–67). Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Katz, E. (2009). The end of television. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (2007). No more peace! How disaster, terror and war have upstaged media events. International Journal of Communication, 1, 157–166.Google Scholar
  16. Liebes, T., & Blondheim, M. (2005). Myths to the rescue: How live television intervenes in history. In E. Rothenbuhler & M. Coman (Eds.), Media anthropology (pp. 188–198). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcinkowski, F. (2008). Public sphere, fragmentation of. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. (1.3.2019). Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  18. Ong, J. O. (2014). “Witnessing” or “mediating” distant suffering? Ethical questions across moments of text, production, and reception. Television & New Media, 15(3), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peters, J. D. (2009a [2001]). Witnessing. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 23–41). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Peters, J. D. (2009b). An afterword: Torchlight red on sweaty faces. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 42–48). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Rothenbuhler, E. (2010). Media events in the age of terrorism and the Internet. The Romanian Review of Journalism and Communication, 4(2), 34–41.Google Scholar
  22. Scannell, P. (2001). Editorial. Media, Culture & Society, 23(6), 699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scannell, P. (2004). What reality has misfortune? Media, Culture & Society, 7(26), 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Silverstone, R. (2004). Proper distance: Towards an ethics for cyberspace. In G. Liestol, A. Morrison, & T. Rasmussen (Eds.), Innovations (pp. 469–490). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sumiala, J. (2013). Media and ritual. Death, community and everyday life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Sumiala, J., & Tikka, M. (2010). “Web first” to death: The media logic of the school shootings in the era of uncertainty. Nordicom Review, 31, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sumiala, J., & Tikka, M. (2011). Imagining globalised fears: School shooting videos and circulation of violence on YouTube. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 19(3), 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sumiala-Seppänen, J. (2008). Circulation. In D. Morgan (Ed.), Keywords in religion, media, and culture (pp. 44–55). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, G. (2009). Witness as a cultural form of communication: Historical roots, structural dynamics, and current appearances. In P. Frosh & A. Pinchevski (Eds.), Media witnessing: Testimony in the age of mass communication (pp. 89–111). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tolson, A. (2010). A new authenticity? Communicative practices on YouTube. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(4), 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media and Communication StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations