Responsibility and Resistance pp 161-173 | Cite as
Corporate Responsibility in a Mediatized World: Institutional Ethics and the Question of Consumer Sovereignty
- 74 Downloads
Abstract
This chapter questions the relevance of the concept of ‘consumer sovereignty’ in mediatized worlds on the theoretical basis of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. The ability to choose and make use of media offerings is dependent on the encompassing concept of ‘media capabilities’—and not on any rational choice actions by individuals. Following these arguments, responsibility in a world of mediatized institutions must (beneath being attributed to individual actors) also be borne by institutions like media companies. This ‘corporate’ responsibility has three components, all of them with communicative implications. Lastly, the role of media and media organizations in enabling better-informed participation in democratic processes by assisting in ‘interpersonal’ comparisons of utility is briefly examined.
Keywords
Consumer sovereignty Mediatized organizations Media capabilities Corporate responsibility Interpersonal comparison of utility Rational choiceReferences
- Adolf, M. (2011). Clarifying mediatization: Sorting through a current debate. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christians, C. G. (2007). Utilitarianism in media ethics and its discontents. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2–3), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding media economics. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freeman, E. R., & Evan, W. M. (1993). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In G. D. Chryssides & J. H. Kaler (Eds.), An introduction to business ethics (pp. 254–267). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Göbel, E. (2006). Unternehmensethik. Grundlagen und praktische Umsetzung. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
- Hepp, A. (2016). Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft in datengetriebenen Zeiten. Publizistik, 61(3), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karmasin, M. (2016). Die Mediatisierung der Gesellschaft und ihre Paradoxien. Wien: Facultas.Google Scholar
- Karmasin, M., & Litschka, M. (2008). Wirtschaftsethik. Theorien, Strategien, Trends. Wien: LIT.Google Scholar
- Karmasin, M., & Litschka, M. (2017). CSR as an economic, ethical, and communicative concept. In S. Diehl, M. Karmasin, B. Mueller, R. Terlutter, & F. Weder (Eds.), Handbook of integrated CSR communication (pp. 37–50). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katz, E., & Foulkes, D. (1962). On the use of the mass media as escape. Clarification of a concept. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(3), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication. Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19–31). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Kiefer, M. L., & Steininger, C. (2014). Medienökonomik. München: Oldenbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2011). A concretization of mediatization. How mediatization works and why ‘mediatized worlds’ are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Litschka, M. (2015). Medien-Capabilities als polit-ökonomisches Konzept in der Medienethik. Theoretische Grundlagen und mögliche Anwendungen. Communicatio Socialis, 48(2), 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Litschka, M., & Karmasin, M. (2012). Ethical implications of the mediatization of organizations. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 10(4), 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moser, H. (2010). Einführung in die Medienpädagogik. Aufwachsen im Medienzeitalter. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noll, B. (2002). Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik in der Marktwirtschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
- Ortmann, G. (2002). Regel und Ausnahme. Paradoxien sozialer Ordnung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Picard, R. G. (2002). The economics and financing of media companies. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
- Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Redefining the corporation. Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sander, U., & Vollbrecht, R. (1987). Kinder und Jugendliche im Medienzeitalter. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools. A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1987). On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (1999). The possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 89(3), 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (2003). Ökonomie für den Menschen. Wege zu Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität in der Marktwirtschaft. München: dtv.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. K. (2010). Die Idee der Gerechtigkeit. München: Beck.Google Scholar
- Tokarski, K. O. (2008). Ethik und Entrepreneurship. Eine theoretische sowie empirische Analyse junger Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Unternehmensethikforschung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
- Ulrich, P. (2001). Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie (3rd ed.). Berlin: Haupt.Google Scholar
- Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics. A modern approach (8th ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Weder, F., & Karmasin, M. (2011). Corporate communicative responsibility. Kommunikation als Ziel und Mittel unternehmerischer Verantwortungswahrnehmung – Studienergebnisse aus Österreich. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 12(3), 410–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar