Zusammenfassung
Safety analysis is an important topic in many different domains in engineering. One of the most important areas where safety assessment plays a major role is the autonomous driving. As a safety-critical domain, the automotive sector heavily needs the tools and techniques to assess the safety level in design phases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
1. ISO-26262 (2011). Road vehicles - Functional safety.
2. Rana, R., Staron, M., Berger, C., Hansson, J., Nilsson, M., and Törner, F. (2013). Improving fault injection in automotive model based development using fault bypass modeling. In GI-Jahrestagung, 2577-2591.
3. Zhang, J., Rizzoni, G., Cordoba-Arenas, A., Amodio, A., and Aksun-Guvenc, B. (2017). Model-based diagnosis and fault tolerant control for ensuring torque functional safety of pedal-by-wire systems. Control Engineering Practice, 61, 255-269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.11.017. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066116302775.
4. Juez, G., Amparan, E., Lattarulo, R., Rastelli, J.P., Ruiz, A., and Espinoza, H. (2017). Safety assessment of automated vehicle functions by simulation-based fault injection. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), 214-219. https://doi.org/10.1109/icves.2017.7991928.
5. Lu, M., Wevers, K., and Heijden, R.V.D. (2005). Technical feasibility of advanced driver assistance systems (adas) for road traffic safety. Transportation Planning and Technology, 28(3), 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060500120282. URL https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060500120282.
6. SAE-J3016 (2014). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems.
7. Saraoğlu, M., Morozov, A., Söylemez, M.T., and Janschek, K. (2017). ErrorSim: A Tool for Error Propagation Analysis of Simulink Models. In International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, 245-254. Springer.
8. Svenningsson, R., Eriksson, H., Vinter, J., and Trngren, M. (2010). Modelimplemented fault injection for hardware fault simulation. In 2010 Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering, Verification, and Validation, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1109/modevva.2010.11.
9. Pill, I., Rubil, I., Wotawa, F., and Nica, M. (2016). Simultate: A toolset for fault injection and mutation testing of simulink models. In 2016 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1109/icstw.2016.21.
10. Kooli, M. and Natale, G.D. (2014). A survey on simulation-based fault injection tools for complex systems. In 2014 9th IEEE International Conference on Design Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era (DTIS), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/dtis.2014.6850649.
11. Joshi, A. and Heimdahl, M.P.E. (2005). Model-based safety analysis of simulink models using scade design verifier. In R. Winther, B. A. Gran, and G. Dahll (eds.), Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, 122-135. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.
12. Vinter, J., Bromander, L., Raistrick, P., and Edler, H. (2007). Fiscade – a fault injection tool for scade models. In 2007 3rd Institution of Engineering and Technology Conference on Automotive Electronics, 1-9.
13. Silveira, A.M., Arajo, R.E., and de Castro, R. (2012). Fieev: A co-simulation framework for fault injection in electrical vehicles. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1109/icves.2012.6294254.
14. Behere, S. and Torngren, M. (2015). A functional architecture for autonomous driving. In 2015 First International Workshop on Automotive Software Architecture (WASA), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2752489.2752491.
15. Smith, P.F., Prabhu, S.M., and Friedman, J. (2007). Best practices for establishing a model-based design culture. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.
16. Pintard, L., Fabre, J.C., Kanoun, K., Leeman, M., and Roy, M. (2013). Fault injection in the automotive standard iso 26262: an initial approach. In Dependable Computing, 126-133. Springer.
17. Bagschik, G., Reschka, A., Stolte, T., and Maurer, M. (2016). Identifıcation of potential hazardous events for an unmanned protective vehicle. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 691-697. doi: 10:1109/IVS.2016.7535462.
18. Menzel, T., Bagschik, G., and Maurer, M. (2018). Scenarios for development, test and validation of automated vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08598.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saraoğlu, M., Morozov, A., Janschek, K. (2019). Safety assessment of autonomous and connected vehicles by a model-based traffic simulation framework. In: Bargende, M., Reuss, HC., Wagner, A., Wiedemann, J. (eds) 19. Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium . Proceedings. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25939-6_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25939-6_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25938-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25939-6
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)