Skip to main content

Prägung akademischer Gründer durch die makroökonomische Umwelt – Eine fallstudienbasierte Analyse am Beispiel von omics2view.consulting

  • 1397 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Imprinting-Fachliteratur hat seit ihrer Entstehung eine Vielzahl an prägenden Faktoren identifiziert, jedoch die Prägung mittels makroökonomischer Faktoren vor allem auf der Individualebene vernachlässigt. Dies gilt insbesondere für die Prägung akademischer Gründer. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit erfolgt eine umfangreiche State-of-the-Art Analyse der bisherigen makroökonomischen Imprinting-Fachliteratur und deren anschließende Übertragung auf die Prägung akademischer Gründer. (1) Die konjunkturelle Lage, (2) die Wahrnehmung zur Verfügbarkeit von Subventionen sowie (3) die gesellschaftliche Legitimation unternehmerischen Handelns werden dabei als einflussreiche Quellen des Imprintings identifiziert. Anhand einer Fallstudie des akademischen Spin-Offs omics2view.consulting aus dem Bereich der bioinformatischen und biostatistischen Datenanalyse werden die aufgestellten Propositionen überprüft und Implikationen für Theorie und Praxis abgeleitet.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Für weiterführende Informationen zur fallstudienbasierten Forschung sei auf das Standardwerk von Yin (2013) verwiesen.

Literatur

  • 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010). A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature, 467(7319), 1061–1073.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., & Thurik, A. R. (Hrsg.). (2007). Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Pathak, S., & Wennberg, K. (2013). Consequences of cultural practices for entrepreneurial behaviors. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(4), 334–362.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, J., & Yi, Y. (1989). An investigation into the role of intentions as mediators of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10(1), 35–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Banalieva, E. R., Karam, C. M., Ralston, D. A., Elenkov, D., Naoumova, I., Dabic, M., Potocan, V., Starkus, A., Danis, W., & Wallace, A. (2017). Communist footprint and subordinate influence behavior in post-communist transition economies. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 209–229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. R., Olian, J. D., Erez, M., Schnell, E. R., Smith, K. G., Sims, H. P., Scully, J. S., & Smith, K. A. (1993). Nationality and work role interactions: A cultural contrast of Israeli and US entrepreneurs’ versus managers’ needs. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(6), 499–512.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Behjati, S., & Tarpey, P. S. (2013). What is next generation sequencing? Archives of Disease in Childhood-Education and Practice, 98(6), 236–238.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J. M., & Hannah, D. R. (2002). Building on the past: Enacting established personal identities in a new work setting. Organization Science, 13(6), 636–652.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • BIS Research. (2017). Next generation sequencing (NGS) market size & forecast by application (oncology, reproductive health), by technology (targeted, WGS, WES), by workflow (data analysis), by end-use (academic & clinical research), and trend analysis, 2014–2025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchardt, A., & Göthlich, S. E. (2009). Erkenntnisgewinnung durch Fallstudien. In Methodik der empirischen Forschung (S. 33–48). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, G. (2004). The financing of business start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 261–283.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chamlin, M. B., Grasmick, H. G., Bursik, R. J., & Cochran, J. K. (1992). Time aggregation and time lag in macro-level deterrence research. Criminology, 30(3), 377–396.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Markóczy, L. (1993). Host-Country managerial behaviour and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 611–631.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from european research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084–1093.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. A. (2017). Angewandte Makroökonomie: Eine praxisbezogene Einführung. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 373–397.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DePristo, M. A., Banks, E., Poplin, R., Garimella, K. V., Maguire, J. R., Hartl, C., Philippakis, A. A., des Angel, G., A Rivas, M., Hanna, M., McKenna, A., Fennell, T. J., Kernytsky, A. M., Sivachenko, A. Y., Cibulskis, K., Gabriel, S. B., Altshuler, D., & Daly, M. J. (2011). A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics, 43(5), 491–498.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., Ganser, T., McLiesh, C., Ramalho, R., & Shleifer, A. (2010). The effect of corporate taxes on investment and entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubina, I. N., & Ramos, S. J. (2013). Creativity across cultures. In Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (S. 360–364). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., Aharonson, B. S., Drori, I., & Shapira, Z. (2017). Imprinting through inheritance: A multi-genealogical study of entrepreneurial proclivity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 500–522.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation: A macro-behavioral perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8(2), 175–189.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E., & Lorenzoni, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 1011–1048.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2005). Social capital and lifelong learning. Bristol: Policy Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A., Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2010). Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 510–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethner, M., Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Cantner, U. (2012). Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 628–641.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C. (2005). Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry (Bd. 16). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immelmann, K. (1975). Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 6(1), 15–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the swedish university system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32, 1555–1568.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, V. (2007). What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 97–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Gao, F. Y. (2010). An empirical study of human resource management practices in family firms in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2095–2119.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Gao, F. Y. (2013). Does family involvement increase business performance? Family-longevity goals’ moderating role in Chinese family firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 265–274.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit: Studies in the theory of entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., & Campbell, J. T. (2015). You don’t forget your roots: The influence of CEO social class background on strategic risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1614–1636.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kriauciunas, A., & Kale, P. (2006). The impact of socialist imprinting and search on resource change: A study of firms in Lithuania. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 659–679.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kulicke, M. (2013). Chancen und Risiken junger Technologieunternehmen: Ergebnisse des Modellversuchs „Förderung technologieorientierter Unternehmensgründungen“ (Bd. 4). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landier, A. (2002). Entrepreneurship and the stigma of failure. Working Paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1937). Imprinting. Auk, 54(1), 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk taking? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373–416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., Tate, G., & Yan, J. (2011). Overconfidence and early-life experiences: The effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1687–1733.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Huang, Z. (2010). Acquisitions as exaptation: The legacy of founding institutions in the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1441–1473.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Smith, A. R. (2015). Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 11–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Jaffee, J., & Tortoriello, M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23(2), 547–563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., Yang, E. A. Y., & Tsai, W. (1992). Does culture endure, or is it malleable? Issues for entrepreneurial economic development. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(6), 441–458.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Milani, F. (2007). Expectations, learning and macroeconomic persistence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7), 2065–2082.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000). Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 974–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51–75.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. D. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the tendency to be an entrepreneur: A bivariate genetics perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 108–117.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 291–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. (2003). ‚Enrolling alone?‘ Lifelong learning and social capital in England. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(3), 235–248.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology: A perspective on psychological functioning and social reform. London: Psychology Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoar, A., & Zuo, L. (2017). Shaped by booms and busts: How the economy impacts CEO careers and management styles. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(5), 1425–1456.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682–685.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton & K. H. Vesper (Hrsg.), The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (S. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., McMullen, J. S., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). The formation of opportunity beliefs: Overcoming ignorance and reducing doubt. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 75–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015). „What’s past is prologue“ A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management, 41(1), 288–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, U., & Uhlaner, L. M. (2010). Performance-based vs socially supportive culture: A cross-national study of descriptive norms and entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), 1347–1364.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Phillips, L. T. (2014). Social class culture cycles: How three gateway contexts shape selves and fuel inequality. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 611–634.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. H., Jr., & Roth, P. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145–153.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizations (S. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. (2014). Generalizing from research findings: The merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 369–383.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1904). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 20, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L., & Blackwell, A. (2013). Interdisciplinarity and innovation. In E. Carayannis (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship (S. 1097–1105). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chiodini, R., Badr, A., & Zhang, G. (2011). The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 38(3), 95–109.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Hutchinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hutchinson, P., Petersen, C. (2019). Prägung akademischer Gründer durch die makroökonomische Umwelt – Eine fallstudienbasierte Analyse am Beispiel von omics2view.consulting. In: Dickel, P., Walter, A., Sienknecht, M., Rasmus, A. (eds) Fallstudien zu akademischen Ausgründungen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25700-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25700-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25700-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)