Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Fallstudien zu akademischen Ausgründungen pp 41–74Cite as

Prägung des unternehmerischen Verhaltens von Akademikern durch biografische Netzwerke: Fallstudienanalyse des akademischen High-Tech Unternehmens Optosight GmbH

  • 1440 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Akademische Entrepreneure sind Treiber des technologischen Wandels und bedeuten ein hohes ökonomisches Wertpotenzial für eine Gesellschaft. Folglich ist ein Kerninteresse der Wirtschafts- und Hochschulpolitik das unternehmerische Verhalten von Akademikern zu fördern. Eine effektive Förderung von akademischen Entrepreneuren setzt allerdings das Verständnis voraus, warum und unter welchen Rahmenbedingungen Akademiker unternehmerisch aktiv werden. Studien zum akademischen Entrepreneurship zeigen, dass psychografische Faktoren und soziale Netzwerke das unternehmerische Verhalten von Personen motivieren. Eine besonders prägende Wirkung erfolgt durch biografische soziale Netzwerke, welche aus Rollenmodellen oder sozialen Kollektiven der Vergangenheit bestehen können. Die Wirkung von Rollenmodellen und sozialen Kollektiven, die in vergangenen sensiblen Lebensphasen eines Akademikers das unternehmerische Verhalten prägen, ist kritisch zu betrachten und bedarf einer differenzierten Untersuchung, da sie im Gegensatz zu bisherigen theoretischen Ansätzen nicht nur geplantes, sondern vollzogenes Verhalten erklären können.

Zur differenzierten Analyse unternehmerischer Verhaltensweisen erfolgt eine theoretische Integration von intentions- und prägungsbasierten Modellen. Vor dem Hintergrund des aktuellen Forschungsstandes des akademischen Entrepreneurship werden Propositionen postuliert. Die resultierende Konzeption wird mit Hilfe einer explorativen Fallstudie eines akademischen Entrepreneurs (Mitgründer des Hochtechnologieunternehmens Optosight GmbH) qualitativ validiert. Die Befunde sprechen gegen einen unmittelbaren Prägungseffekt biografisch-sozialer Netzwerke auf das unternehmerische Verhalten akademischer Entrepreneure. Allerdings können psychografische Faktoren, die unternehmerische Verhaltensweisen motivieren, Ergebnisse von historisch-sozialen Prägungen sein. Folglich sollten die Gestalter öffentlicher Programme zur Förderung akademischer Entrepreneure auf Maßnahmen setzen, welche auf die Prägung von verhaltensmotivierenden psychografischen Faktoren abzielen jedoch nicht auf das Verhalten selber. Zukünftige Forschung bedarf quantitativer, longitudinaler Arbeiten, die dem multi-periodischen Charakter der Prägung von akademischen Entrepreneuren gerecht werden und Generalisierungen ermöglichen.

Namen und Firma wurden zum Schutz der Personen pseudonymisiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2005). Identity and the economics of organizations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 9–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., Renzulli, L. A., & Langton, N. (1998). Passing on privilege: Resources provided by self-employed parents to their self-employed children. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 16, 291–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algieri, B., Aquino, A., & Succurro, M. (2013). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: The case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 382–400.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Aschhoff, B., & Grimpe, C. (2014). Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology. Research Policy, 43(2), 367–381.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Azoulay, P., Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. E. (2017). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4), 1223–1271.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., & Schjoedt, L. (2009). Entrepreneurial behavior: Its nature, scope, recent research, and agenda for future research. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Hrsg.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind. International studies in entrepreneurship (Bd. 24, S. 327–358). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, H. (1991). Zur Kultivierung des Unternehmerischen im Unternehmen. In U. D. Laub & D. Schneider (Hrsg.), Innovation und Unternehmertum (S. 273–295). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), 239–251.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1992). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as intergenerational influence and entrepreneurial intent: A theory of planned behavior approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1090–1098.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Daig, I. (2006). Male gender role dysfunction. Age differences in men: Male gender-role stress, impression management and risk behavior. Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokko, G., Wilk, S. L., & Rothbard, N. P. (2009). Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 51–68.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., Aharonson, B. S., Drori, I., & Shapira, Z. (2017). Imprinting through inheritance: A multi-genealogical study of entrepreneurial proclivity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 500–522.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. L., Dimitriadi, N., Gavidia, J. V., Schlaegel, C., Delanoe, S., Alvarado, I., Wolff, B., et al. (2010). Entrepreneurial intent: A twelve-country evaluation of Ajzen’s model of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(1), 35–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‚quasi-firms‘: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Falck, O., Heblich, S., & Luedemann, E. (2012). Identity and entrepreneurship: Do school peers shape entrepreneurial intentions? Small Business Economics, 39(1), 39–59.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B., Carter, N. M., & Reynolds, P. D. (2003). Entrepreneurial behavior and firm organizing processes. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Hrsg.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (International handbook series on entrepreneurship, Bd. 1, S. 195–221). Boston: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S., & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408–421.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2009). Social interactions and entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(3), 665–709.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 35–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S. (2016). Constraining entrepreneurial development: A knowledge-based view of social networks among academic entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 45(2), 475–490.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, C. S., Lubynsky, R., & Maroulis, S. (2017). Who is the academic entrepreneur? The role of graduate students in the development of university spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(6), 1237–1254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. (2004). Career imprinting and leadership development: Theory and practice. In S. Chowdhury (Hrsg.), Next generation business handbook (S. 91–105). Hoboken: Wiley.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C. (2005). Career imprints: Creating leaders across an industry. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S., George, G., & Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38(6), 922–935.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kacperczyk, A. J. (2009). Inside or outside: The social mechanisms of entrepreneurship choices. Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacperczyk, A. J. (2013). Social influence and entrepreneurship: The effect of university peers on entrepreneurial entry. Organization Science, 24(3), 664–683.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kautonen, T., Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M., & Goe, W. R. (2004). The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy, 33(5), 691–707.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, R. E., Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2018). Learning bad habits across generations: How negative imprints affect human resource management in the family firm. Human Resource Management Review, 28(1), 5–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe – The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krabel, S., & Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38(6), 947–956.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. (2017). Entrepreneurial intentions are dead: Long live entrepreneurial intentions. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Hrsg.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind (S. 13–34). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91–104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, A. (2011). What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‚Gold‘, ‚ribbon‘ or ‚puzzle‘? Research Policy, 40(10), 1354–1368.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Der Foo, M., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: The influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 124–136.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., Williams-Jones, B., Denis, J. L., & Longo, C. (2014). How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 43(6), 1025–1038.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E., & Stoto, M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110–131.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C. (2003). The pressure of the past: Network imprinting in intercorporate communities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 655–689.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013). Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 195–245.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, B. D., Williams, D. W., & Smith, A. R. (2015). Entrepreneurial inception: The role of imprinting in entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 11–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Jaffee, J., & Tortoriello, M. (2012). Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organization Science, 23(2), 547–563.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship education where the intention to act lies: An investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behavior. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(2), 187–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P. D. (1992). Sociology and entrepreneurship: Concepts and contributions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 47–70.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 13–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S., Carley, S. S., & Wiebe, F. A. (1989). Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13(3), 53–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: A meta-analytic test and integration of competing models. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 291–332.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A., Walter, S. G., & Walter, A. (2013). Radicalness of technological inventions and young venture performance – The role of technological competition and product diversity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(4), 728–738.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., Dolmans, S. A., Jankowski, J., Reymen, I. M., & Romme, A. G. L. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Which inventors do technology licensing officers prefer for spinoffs? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(2), 273–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton & K. H. Vesper (Hrsg.), Encylclopedia of entrepreneurship (S. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015). „What’s past is prologue“ A framework, review, and future directions for organizational research on imprinting. Journal of Management, 41(1), 288–317.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (1999). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizations (S. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B., Tang, Y., & Marquis, C. (2014). Persistently learning: How small-world network imprints affect subsequent firm learning. Strategic Organization, 12(3), 180–199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tilcsik, A. (2014). Imprint–environment fit and performance: How organizational munificence at the time of hire affects subsequent job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 639–668.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Veciana, J. M., Aponte, M., & Urbano, D. (2005). University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: A two countries comparison. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(2), 165–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. G., & Walter, A. (2009). Personenbezogene Determinanten von Unternehmensgründungen: Stand der Forschung und Perspektiven des Fortschritts. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 61(1), 57–89.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, A., Gemünden, H. G., & Auer, M. (2003). Unternehmerische Aktivitäten im Technologietransfer. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 73(7), 679–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self-employment intentions of business students: A cross-level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 175–200.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland

    Gerrit Jochims

Authors
  1. Gerrit Jochims
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Jochims .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachhochschule Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Petra Dickel

  2. Univ. Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Achim Walter

  3. Univ. Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Monika Sienknecht

  4. Univ. Kiel, Kiel, Germany

    Dr. Anke Rasmus

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jochims, G. (2019). Prägung des unternehmerischen Verhaltens von Akademikern durch biografische Netzwerke: Fallstudienanalyse des akademischen High-Tech Unternehmens Optosight GmbH. In: Dickel, P., Walter, A., Sienknecht, M., Rasmus, A. (eds) Fallstudien zu akademischen Ausgründungen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25700-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25700-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25699-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25700-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

search

Navigation