Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Die internationale Schutzverantwortung im Lichte des gerechten Friedens pp 107–142Cite as

Responsibility to Protect – ein westliches Konzept?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 985 Accesses

Part of the book series: Gerechter Frieden ((GEFR))

Zusammenfassung

Die Schutzverantwortung (Responsibility to Protect, R2P) wird in diesem Aufsatz als ein umfassendes politisches Konzept verstanden. Es bündelt rechtliche, ethische und politische Normen, Prinzipien und Überlegungen in Bezug auf den Schutz des Menschen vor schwersten Menschenrechtsverletzungen. Indem es diese neu zu denken, zu interpretieren und zu verknüpfen sucht, wird das Ziel verfolgt, bestehende Spannungen und Widersprüche – zwischen dem Souveränitätsprinzip, Gewalt- und Interventionsverbot auf der einen und bestehenden völkerrechtlichen Normen zum Schutz des Individuums vor schwersten Menschenrechtsverletzungen auf der anderen Seite – aufzulösen (vgl. Arnauld 2015, S. 64ff.; Luck 2008, S. 53; Mabera und Spies 2016, S. 214f.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aboagye, Festus. 2012. South Africa and R2P: More State Sovereignty and Regime Security than Human Security? In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action, hrsg. von der Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, dem Institute for Security Studies, der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung und dem South African Institute of International Affairs, 29–52. Johannesburg: United Litho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aboobaker, Shanti. 2017. At War With the West. http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-05-28-at-war-with-the-west. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

  • Afrikanische Union (AU). 2000. Constitutive Act of the African Union. http://www.achpr.org/instruments/au-constitutive-act/. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2018.

  • Afrikanische Union (AU). 2005. The Common African Position on the Proposd Reform of the United Nations: The Ezulwini Consensus. http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/au/cap_screform_2005.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. Oktober 2018.

  • Almeida, Paula Wojcikiewcz. 2017. Brazil’s Inconsistent Approach towards International Organizations and R2P. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 71–100. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnauld, Andreas von. 2015. Werdende Norm oder politisches Konzept? Zur völkerrechtlichen Einordnung der Responsibility to Protect. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 55–76. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Dipankar. 2012. India and R2P: Reconciling the Tension Between Intervention and State Sovereignty. In The Responsibility to Protect – From Evasive to Reluctant Action. The Role of Global Middle Powers, hrsg. von der Hanns-Seidel-Stiftung, dem Institute for Security Studies, der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung und dem South African Institute of International Affairs, 91–100. Johannesburg: United Litho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, Thorsten. 2013. Brazil as a Norm Entrepreneur: The „Responsibility While Protecting“-Initiative. https://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pub/2013/Benner_2013_Working-Paper_Brazil-RWP.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • Bush, George H. W. 1992. State of the Union. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/29/us/state-union-transcript-president-bush-s-addressstate-union.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Oktober 2018.

  • Charbonneau, Louis. 2011. U.N. Chief Defends NATO From Critics of Libya War. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-nato-un-idUSTRE7BD20C20111214. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

  • Dembinski, Matthias. 2016. Regionale Sicherheitsorganisationen als Barrieren oder Bausteine globalen Regierens. https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/report0716.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.

  • Dembinski, Matthias. 2017. Procedural Justice and Global Order: Explaining African Reaction to the Application of Global Protection Norms. European Journal of International Relations 23(4): 809–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Francis M., Sadikiel Kimaro, Terrence Lyons, Donald Rothchild und I. William Zartman (Hrsg.). 1996. Sovereignty as Responsibility. Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, D.C. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterhuyse, Abel. 2016. The South African Threat Agenda: Between Political Agendas, Perceptions and Contradictions. S+F. Sicherheit und Frieden – Security and Peace 34 (3): 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth. 2013. Protecting Civilians Responsibly. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/gareth-evanson-moves-by-china-and-other-brics-countries-to-embrace-humanitarian-intervention. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • Ganguly, Sumit. 2013. India in the Liberal Order. http://www.transatlanticacademy.org/publications/india-liberal-order. Zugegriffen: 23. September 2018.

  • Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2012. China and the „Responsibility to Protect“: The Implications of the Libyan Intervention. Asian Journal of International Law 2 (2): 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwood-Gowers, Andrew. 2013. The BRICS and the Responsibility to Protect: Lessons From the Libyan and Syrian Crises. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/59649/. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • Garwood-Gowers. 2016. China’s „Responsible Protection“ Concept: Reinterpreting the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and Military Intervention for Humanitarian Purposes. Asian Journal of International Law 6 (1): 89–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldenhuys, Deon. 2010. South Africa: The Idea-Driven Foreign Policy of a Regional Power. In Regional Leadership in the Global System. Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, hrsg. von Daniel Flemes, 151–167. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golovnina, Marina und Michael Georgy. 2011. West in „Mediaeval Crusade“ on Gaddafi, Putin says. https://www.reuters.com/article/ozatp-libya-idAFJOE72K0DF20110321. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

  • Herz, Monica. 2013. Assumptions on Intervention and Security in South America. In South America and Peace Operations. Coming of age, hrsg. von Kai Michael Kenkel, 25–44. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). 2001. The Responsibility to Protect. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf. Zugegriffen: 8. Oktober 2018.

  • Jaganathan, Madhan Mohan. 2017. It’s more than What It Seems: Understanding India’s Perspective on „Responsibility to Protect“. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 41–70. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaganatha, Madhan Mohan und Gerrit Kurtz. 2014. Singing the Tune of Sovereignty? India and the Responsibility to Protect. Conflict, Security and Development 14(4): 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, Kai Michael. 2013. Introduction: Diversity Within a Common Culture: South America and Peace Operations. In South America and Peace Operations. Coming of Age, hrsg. von Kai Michael Kenkel, 1–22. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, Kai Michael und Christina G. Stefan. 2016. Brazil and the Responsibility While Protecting Initiative: Norms and the Timing of Diplomatic Support. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 22 (1): 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikoler, Naomi. 2014. Supporting African Solutions to African Problems – IBSA and the Implementation of Article 4 (h). In Africa and the Responsibility to Protect: Article 4 (h) of the African Union Constitutive Act, hrsg. von Dan Kuwali and Viljoen Frans, 325–337. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozyrev, Vitaly 2016. Harmonizing „Responsibility to Protect“: China’s Vision of a Post-Sovereign World. International Relations 30 (3): 328–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Dan. 2015. Und sie bewegt sich doch! Indiens Haltung zur Responsibility to Protect. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 181–215. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Dan. 2017. Still on Board? South Africa and the Responsibility to Protect. In Southern Democracies and the Responsibility to Protect. Perspectives from India, Brazil and South Africa, hrsg. von Daniel Peters und Dan Krause, 181–210. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreß, Claus und Benjamin Nussberger. 2017. Pro-Democratic Intervention in Current International Law: The Case of The Gambia in January 2017. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law 4 (2): 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurowska, Xymena. 2014. Multipolarity as Resistance to Liberal Norms: Russia’s Position on Responsibility to Protect. Conflict, Security and Development 14 (4): 489–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Chris. 2010. Pax South Africana and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (4): 436–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Chris and Candice Moore. 2012. South Africa’s Libya Vote: How is Foreign Policy Decided? New Agenda, South African Journal of Social and Economic Policy 2012 (Fourth Quarter): 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucey, Amanda, Gustavo de Carvalho und Sibongile Gida. 2014. South Africa and the United Nations. Strengthening Opportunities for Effective Peacebuilding. https://issafrica.org/research/papers/south-africa-and-the-united-nations-strengthening-opportunities-for-effective-peacebuilding. Zugegriffen 01. November 2018.

  • Luck, Edward C. 2008. Der verantwortliche Souverän und die Schutzverantwortung. Auf dem Weg von einem Konzept zur Norm. Vereinte Nationen 56 (2): 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabera, Faith. 2016. Persönliches Interview mit dem Autor vom 9. September 2016. Pretoria: Institute for Global Dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabera, Faith und Tim Dunne. 2013. South Africa and the Responsibility to Protect. R2P Ideas in brief 3 (6): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabera, Faith und Yolanda Spies. 2016. How Well does R2P Travel Beyond the West? In The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect, hrsg. von Alex Bellamy und Tim Dunne, 208–226. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, Nelson. 1990. Town Hall Meeting, June 21, 1990 in New York. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6eE9BIUfBg. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.

  • Masters, Lesley. 2012. Opening the „Black Box“ – South African Foreign Policy Making. In South African Foreign Policy Review. Bd. 1, hrsg. von Chris Landsberg, Chris und Jo-Ansie van Wyk, 20–41. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, C. Raja. 2003 Crossing the Rubicon: The Shaping of India’s New Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pidd, Helen 2011 Nato Rejects Russian Claims of Libya Mission Creep. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/15/nato-libya-rasmussen-medvedev-criticism. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

  • Puri, Hardeep Singh. 2012. Statement by H. E. Ambassador H. S. Puri, Permanent Representative of India to the UN, An Informal Interactive Dialogue on the Report of the Secretary General on Responsibility to Protect: Timely and Decisive Action at the 66th Session of the United Nations General Assembly vom 5 September 2012 in New York. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/India.pdf. Zugegriffen: 1. Oktober 2018.

  • Regler, Sonja. 2015. Chinas Haltung zur R2P zwischen Skepsis und Offenheit. In Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens, hrsg. von Michael Staack und Dan Krause, 229–246. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro Viotti, Maria Luiza. 2011. Responsibility While Protecting: Elements for the Development and Promotion of a Concept. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/concept-paper-_rwp.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • Sampford, Charles und Ramesh Thakur. 2015. From the Right to Persecute to the Responsibility to Protect: Feuerbachian Inversions of Rights and Responsibilities in State-Citizen Relations In Theorising the Responsibility to Protect, hrsg. von Ramesh Thakur und William Maley, 38–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siko, John. 2014. Inside South Africa’s Foreign Policy. Diplomacy in Africa from Smuts to Mbeki. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Karen. 2015. R2P and the Protection of Civilians: South Africa’s Perspective on Conflict Resolution. SAIIA Policy Briefing Nr. 133. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staack, Michael und Dan Krause (Hrsg.). 2015. Schutzverantwortung in der Debatte: Die „Responsibility to Protect“ nach dem Libyen-Dissens. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2018. Anteil der BRICS-Staaten am kaufkraftbereinigten globalen Bruttoinlandsprodukt (BIP) von 2008 bis 2018. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/248719/umfrage/anteil-der-bric-staaten-am-globalen-bruttoinlandsprodukt-bip/. Zugegriffen: 16. Oktober 2018.

  • Stewart, Carina. 2011. Russia Accuses Nato of „Expanding“ UN Libya Resolution. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/russia-accuses-nato-of-expanding-un-libya-resolution-2306996.html. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

  • Swaine, Michael D. 2012. Chinese Views of the Syrian Conflict. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Swaine_CLM_39_091312_2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • Teitt, Sarah. 2011. The Responsibility to Protect and China’s Peacekeeping Policy. International Peacekeeping. 18 (3): 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). 1958. India and People’s Republic of China: Agreement (with Exchange of Notes) on Trade and Intercourse Between Tibet Region of China and India. Signed at Peking, 29. April 1954. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%20299/v299.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Oktober 2018.

  • United Nations (UN), Security Council. 1999. Statement by the Permanent Representative of the Republic of India, Mr. Kamalesh Sharma, at the 3998th meeting, 23.03.1999, S/PV.3988. http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/kos%20SPV3988.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Oktober 2018.

  • United Nations (UN), Peacekeeping. 2018. Troop and Police Contributors. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors. Zugegriffen: 18. Oktober 2018.

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1994. Human Development Report 1994. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/255/hdr_1994_en_complete_nostats.pdf. Zugegriffen: 20. September 2018.

  • Weiss, Thomas G. 2006. R2P after 9/11 and the World Summit. Wisconsin International Law Journal 24 (3): 741–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Paul D. 2007. From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference: The Origins and Development of the African Union’s Security Culture. African Affairs 106 (423): 253–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, Herbert. 2013. India’s Aspirations in Global Politics. Competing Ideas and Amorphous Practices. http://inef.uni-due.de/cms/files/report107.pdf. Zugegriffen: 6. Oktober 2018.

  • Ziegler, Charles E. 2016. Russia on the Rebound: Using and Misusing the Responsibility to Protect. International Relations 30 (3): 346–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zongze, Ruan. 2012. Responsible Protection: Building a Safer World. http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm. Zugegriffen: 17. Oktober 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität Hamburg, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Dan Krause

Authors
  1. Dan Krause
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Krause .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Ines-Jacqueline Werkner

  2. Gießen, Hessen, Germany

    Thilo Marauhn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krause, D. (2019). Responsibility to Protect – ein westliches Konzept?. In: Werkner, IJ., Marauhn, T. (eds) Die internationale Schutzverantwortung im Lichte des gerechten Friedens. Gerechter Frieden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25538-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25538-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25537-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-25538-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation