Current State of Risk Assessment in Seaports: An Empirical Study



Seaports are critical links in global supply chains and international logistics networks. They are considered to be a link of cooperation between countries, including transport, logistics, tourism and energy. The recent global economic climate has increased maritime transport (Oskin, 2014; UNCTAD, 2018). One of the reasons is bilateral trade between major economies of the world. Following this, private and public actors are investing significantly to expand or develop new terminals to handle the quick upsurge of sea freight.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alyami, H., Yang, Z., Riahi, R., Bonsall, S. and Wang, J. (2016), “Advanced uncertainty modelling for container port risk analysis”, Accident Analysis & Prevention.Google Scholar
  2. Arvis, J.-F., Ojala, L., Wiederer, C., Shepherd, B., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K. and Kiiski, T. (2018), Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, available at:
  3. Baltic Development Forum (2017), “State of the Region Report”, available at:
  4. Becker, A.H., Matson, P., Fischer, M. and Mastrandrea, M.D. (2015), “Towards seaport resilience for climate change adaptation: Stakeholder perceptions of hurricane impacts in Gulfport (MS) and Providence (RI)”, Progress in Planning, Vol. 99, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
  5. Bundesamt für Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe (2010), Methode für die Risikoanalyse im Bevölkerungsschutz, Wissenschaftsforum, Vol. 8Wissenschaftsforum, Bonn.Google Scholar
  6. Dubois, A. and Schürmann, C. (2009), “Transport and accessibility in the Baltic Sea Region— structures and perspectives”, Spatial Planning and development in the Baltic Sea Region. Bonn, Vol. 8 No. 9.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2016), “Glossary: Baltic Sea Region”, available at: (accessed 12 April 2018)
  8. Gläser, J. and Laudel, G. (2010), Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen, Lehrbuch4. Auflage, VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  9. Interreg (2018), “Baltic Sea Region”, available at:
  10. ISO (2009), ISO 31000: Risk Management: Principles and Guidelines, ISO.Google Scholar
  11. Jakomin, I. (2003), “New function of seaports: Logistics and distribution”, Promet-Traffic& Transportation, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  12. John, A., Yang, Z., Riahi, R. and Wang, J. (2016), “A risk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks”, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 111, pp. 136–147.Google Scholar
  13. Kaundinya, I., Nisancioglu, S., Kammerer, H. and Oliva, R. (2016), “All-hazard Guide for Transport Infrastructure”, Transportation research procedia, Vol. 14, pp. 1325–1334.Google Scholar
  14. Kersten, W., Schröder, M., Böger, M. and Singer, C. (2007), Developing Regions through Spatial Planning and Logistics & ICT competence–Final Report, as part of the LogOn Baltic publication series, Turku.Google Scholar
  15. Malinowski, J. (2017), Modelling hazard-related interactions between the processes realized in and around the Baltic Sea Region ports, HAZARD Publications 9:2017, available at: available at:
  16. Maloni, M.J. and Jackson, E.C. (2010), “Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities”, Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 1, pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
  17. Montwiłł, A. (2014), “The role of seaports as logistics centers in the modelling of the sustainable system for distribution of goods in urban areas”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 151, pp. 257–265.Google Scholar
  18. Nagi, A., Indorf, M. and Kersten, W. (2017), “Bibliometric analysis of risk management in seaports”, in Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 23, pp. 491–521.Google Scholar
  19. Newton, S., Kawabata, Y., Maurer, H., Pearman, A., van Meijeren, J. and de Jong, G. (2010), Ports and their connections within the TEN-T.Google Scholar
  20. NFPA, N. (2011), “921: Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations”, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Ojala, L. (2016), “Maritime transport in the Baltic Sea in 2016”, in Centrum Balticum (Ed.), The maritime cluster in the Baltic Sea region and beyond, BSR Policy Briefing, pp. 38–49, available at:
  22. Ojala, L. (2017), “Logistics and transport in the Baltic Sea region”, in The economic state of the Baltic Sea region, 3, BSR Policy Briefing, pp. 38–49, available at:
  23. Ojala, L., Kersten, W. and Lorentz, H. (2013), “Transport and logistics developments in the Baltic Sea region until 2025”, Journal of East-West Business, Vol. 19 No. 1-2, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar
  24. Oskin, B. (2014), “Ship traffic increases dramatically, to oceans’ detriment”, Live Science.Google Scholar
  25. Pasman, H.J., Rogers, W.J. and Mannan, M.S. (2017), “Risk assessment: What is it worth? Shall we just do away with it, or can it do a better job?”, Safety Science, Vol. 99, pp. 140–155.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M.Q. (2002), Qualitative Research & Evaluation MethodsThird edition, SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  27. Purre, A.-H. (2018), Overview of risk assessments in the western part of Muuga harbour, HAZARD Publications 20:2018, available at: available at:
  28. Rodrigue, J.-P. (2018), The Geography of Transport Systems, Section: Public and Private Roles in Port Management, available at:
  29. Schütz, M. (2006), “Sicherheitsrelevante Aspekte bei der Gefahrgutcontainer-Lagerung”, available at:
  30. Stiller, S. and Wedemeier, J. (2011), The future of the Baltic Sea region: Potentials and challenges.Google Scholar
  31. Tchórzewska-Cieślak, B., Pietrucha-Urbanik, K. and Szpak, D. (2017), Review of methods for identifying threats including the critical infrastructure systems within the Baltic Sea, HAZARD Publications 10:2017, available at: available at:
  32. UNCTAD (2018), “Review of Maritime Transport 2018”, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, available at:
  33. Valdor, P.F., Gómez, A.G., Ondiviela, B., Puente, A. and Juanes, J.A. (2016), “Prioritization maps: The integration of environmental risks to manage water quality in harbor areas”, Marine pollution bulletin, Vol. 111 No. 1-2, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Logistik und UnternehmensführungTechnische Universität HamburgHamburgDeutschland
  2. 2.Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaALübeckDeutschland
  3. 3.Turku School of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinnland

Personalised recommendations