Countering Biases in Risk Analysis

  • Stefan HunzikerEmail author


Many risk management programmes in companies are not as effective as they could or should be. This is due to a number of frequently overlooked factors, such as motivational and cognitive biases. The topic of biases, although much theoretical and empirical literature exists, is still rarely addressed in relation to enterprise risk management. Many studies explicitly show that mistakes made in risk identification and risk assessment significantly distort results and decisions drawn from the risk management process. In the following, some of the most important biases in risk analysis and corresponding debiasing strategies are discussed.


  1. Al-Shammari, M., & Masri, H. (2016). Ethical and Social Perspectives on Global Business Interaction in Emerging Markets. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (9), 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, T., Heiligtag, S., & Samandari, H. (2017). The business logic in debiasing. Accessed 17 December 2018.
  4. Barnes, J. H. (1984). Cognitive Biases and Their Impact on Strategic Planning. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron, J., Gowda, R., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Attitudes toward managing hazardous waste: What should be cleaned up and who should pay for it? Risk Analysis, 13, 183–192. Scholar
  6. Cassotti, M., Habib, M., Poirel, N., Aïte, A., Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (2012). Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making. Emotion, 12 (5), 926–931.Google Scholar
  7. Celati, L. (2004). The Dark Side of Risk Management: How People Frame Decisions in Financial Markets. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Cherry, K. (2018a). Understanding the Optimism Bias. AKA the Illusion of Invulnerability. Accessed 11 December 2018.
  9. Cherry, K. (2018b). How the Status Quo Bias Affects Your Decisions. Accessed 11 December 2018.
  10. Clayton, M. (2011). Risk Happen: Managing risk and avoiding failure in buisness projects. London: Marshall Cavendish International.Google Scholar
  11. de Bono, E. (1999). Six thinking hats. Boston: Back Bay Book.Google Scholar
  12. Dobelli, R. (2018). Die Kunst des klaren Denkens. 52 Denkfehler, die Sie besser anderen überlassen. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, W. (1982). Conservatism in Human Information Processing (excerpted). In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Emmons, D. L., Mazzuchi, T. A., Sarkani, S., & Larsen, C. E. (2018). Mitigating cognitive biases in risk identification: Practitioner checklist for the aerospace sector. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 25 (1), 52–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13 (1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344.Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, H. H. (2017). Cognitive Biases that Interfere with Critical Thinking and Scientific Reasoning: A Course Module. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  18. Gleißner, W. (2017). Grundlagen des Risikomanagements. Mit fundierten Informationen zu besseren Entscheidungen (3rd Ed.). München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grinnell, R. M., & Unrau, Y. A. (2018). Social Work Research and Evaluation. Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice (11th Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hossain, T., & Li, K. K. (2013). Crowding Out in the Labor Market: A Prosocial Setting Is Necessary. Management Science, 60 (5), 1148–1160. Scholar
  21. Hubbard, D. W. (2009). The failure of risk management. Why it’s broken and how to fix it. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Kaba, A., Wishart, I., Fraser, K., Coderre, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2016). Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care? Medical Education, 50 (4), 400–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D. (2007). Short Course in Thinking About Thinking.
  24. Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken (3rd Ed.). München: Siedler Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kamal, P. (2018). How To Spot These Cognitive Biases To Make You Smarter. And Strategies To Make It Work For You. Accessed 22 November 2018.
  27. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kent Baker, H., & Puttonen, V. (2017). Investment Traps Exposed: Navigating Investor Mistakes and Behavioral Biases. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leitl, M. (2007). Social Loafing? Harvard Business Manager. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  31. Lermer, E., Streicher, B., & Sachs, R. (2014). Psychologische Einflüsse II: Risikoeinschätzung in Gruppen. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  32. Manktelow, J. (2005). Mind Tools. Essential skills for an excellent career (4th Ed.). Swindon, UK: Mind Tools Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. McCann, D. (2014). 10 cognitive biases that can trip up finance. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  34. Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2nd Ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Milgram, S. (1965). Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority. Human Relations, 18 (1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and motivational biases in decision and risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 35 (7), 1230–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12 (2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moskaliuk, J. (2013). Warum Gruppen falsch entscheiden. Accessed 20 November 2018.
  39. Murata, A. (2017). Cultural Difference and Cognitive Biases as a Trigger of Critical Crashes or Disasters – Evidence from Case Studies of Human Factors Analysis. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 7, 399–415. Scholar
  40. Redman, T. C. (2017). Root Out Bias from Your Decision-Making Process. Harvard Business Review. Accessed 11 December 2018.
  41. Rees, M. (2015). Business Risk and Simulation Modelling in Practice: Using Excel, VBA and @RISK. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scherrer, M. (2018). Menschlicher Faktor im Risikomanagement. Bachelor Thesis, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar
  43. Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21 (23), R941–R945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shefrin, H. (2016). Behavioral Risk Management. Managing the Psychology That Drives Decisions and Influences Operational Risk. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Sing, R., Ryvola R. (2018). Cognitive Biases in Climate Risk Management. Accessed 18 January 2019.
  46. Smith, E. D., & Bahill, A. T. (2009). Attribute Substitution in Systems Engineering. Systems Engineering (January 2009), 1–19.Google Scholar
  47. Stangor, C. (2014). Principles of Social Psychology – 1st International Edition. Accessed 29 January 2019.
  48. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (6), 1467–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sun, Y., & Wang, H. (2010). Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns. Judgment and Decision Making, 5 (2), 124–132.Google Scholar
  50. Tentori, K., Crupi, V., & Russo, S. (2013). On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142 (1), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tetlock, P. E., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. The Decision Lab (n. d.). Affect Heuristic. Accessed 11 December 2018.
  53. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5 (2), 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wolf, R. F. (2012). How to Minimize Your Biases When Making Decisions. Accessed 21 November 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RotkreuzSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations