Skip to main content

Evaluation of Image Processing Methods for Clinical Applications

Mimicking Clinical Data Using Conditional GANs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019

Part of the book series: Informatik aktuell ((INFORMAT))

Zusammenfassung

While developing medical image applications, their accuracy is usually evaluated on a validation dataset, that generally differs from the real clinical data. Since clinical data does not contain ground truth annotations, it is impossible to approximate the real accuracy of the method. In this work, a cGAN-based method to generate realistically looking clinical data preserving the topology and thus ground truth of the validation set is presented. On the example of image registration of brain MRIs, we emphasize the necessity for the method and show that it enables evaluation of the accuracy on a clinical dataset. Furthermore, the topology preserving and realistic appearance of the generated images are evaluated and considered to be sufficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2014;27:2672–2680.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Armanious K, Yang C, Fischer M, et al. MedGAN: medical image translation using GANs. CoRR. 2018;abs/1806.06397.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schlegl T, Seeböck P, Waldstein SM, et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery. Proc IPMI. 2017; p. 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu JY, Park T, Isola P, et al. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycleconsistent adversarial networks. Proc ICCV. 2017; p. 2242–2251.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isola P, Zhu JY, Zhou T, et al. Image-to-image translation with vonditional adversarial networks. Proc CVPR. 2017;00:5967–5976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc CVPR. 2016; p. 770–778.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V, et al. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage. 2008;39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, et al. The multimodal brain tumor image degmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(10):1993–2024.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen JP, Luck M, Honari S. Distribution matching losses can hallucinate features in medical image Translation. Proc MICCAI. 2018;11070:529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrhardt J, Schmidt-Richberg A, Werner R, et al. Variational registration: a exible open-source ITK toolbox for nonrigid image registration. Proc BVM. 2015; p. 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hristina Uzunova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Uzunova, H., Schultz, S., Handels, H., Ehrhardt, J. (2019). Evaluation of Image Processing Methods for Clinical Applications. In: Handels, H., Deserno, T., Maier, A., Maier-Hein, K., Palm, C., Tolxdorff, T. (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2019. Informatik aktuell. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics