Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nachhaltige Mobilität messbar machen – Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Reifegradmodells für urbane Mobilitätsstrategien

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Cities/Smart Regions – Technische, wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Innovationen

  • 8420 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen der fortschreitenden Urbanisierung gilt es, städtische Mobilitätsinitiativen anhand ihrer Nachhaltigkeitseigenschaften zu bewerten. In diesem Beitrag wird auf Basis einer systematischen Literaturanalyse ein Reifegradmodell und daraus folgend ein Indikatoren-Set zur Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Mobilitätsstrategien von Smart Cities entwickelt und evaluiert. Die Reifegrade des Modells werden durch die in einen Fragebogen überführten Indikatoren ermittelt und anhand öffentlich zugänglicher Daten evaluiert. Das Forschungsdesign folgt den Regeln der Design Science und richtet sich an Stadtverwaltungen und Praktiker aus dem Bereich Smart City Mobilität.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. United Nations (2015) Word population prospects. Key findigs & advance tables. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dirks S, Gurdgiev C, Keeling M (2010) Smarter cities for smarter growth: how cities can optimize their systems for the talent-based economy. IBM Global Business Services, Somers

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dirks S, Keeling M (2009) A vision of Smarter cities: how cities can lead the way into a prosperous and sustainable future. IBM Global Business Services, Somers

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dirks S, Keeling M, Dencik J (2009) How smart is your city? helping cities measure progress. IBM Global Business Services, Somers

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borja J (2007) Counterpoint: Intelligent cities and innovative cities. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) Papers: E-Journal on the Knowledge Society, 5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marceau J (2008) Introduction: innovation in the city and innovative cities. Innov Manag Policy Pract 10(2–3):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Toppeta D (2010) The smart city vision: how innovation and ICT can build smart, „Livable“, sustainable cities. The innovation knowledge foundation

    Google Scholar 

  8. Washburn D, Sindhu U, Balaouras S, Dines RA, Hayes NM, Nelson LE (2010) Helping CIOs understand „smart city“ initiatives: defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Forrester Research, Inc, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caragliu A, Del Bo C, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart cities in Europe, series research memoranda 0048. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Kalasek R, Pichler-Milanovic N, Meijers E (2007) Smart cities – ranking of European medium-sized cities. Research Report, Vienna, University of Technology, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Pichler-Milanovic N, Meijers E (2013) European smart cities. Vienna University, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hollands RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City 12(3):303–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Natural Resources Defense Council. What are smarter cities?. http://smartercities.nrdc.org/about. Zugegriffen am 17.08.2016

  14. Hatzelhoffer L, Humboldt K, Lobeck M, Wiegandt C (2013) Smart City konkret – Eine Zukunftswerkstatt in Deutschland zwischen Idee und Praxis. jovis Verlag GmbH, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kavaratzis M (2008) From city marketing to city branding: an interdisciplinary analysis with reference to Amsterdam, Budapest and Athens. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  16. Govers R, Go FM (2009) 3 tourism destination image formation. In: Handbook of tourist behavior: theory & practice, Bd 35. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dinnie K.(2011) City branding: theory and cases. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. High Representative and European Commission (2008) Paper S113/08 to the European Council on climate change and international security. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/EN/reports/99387.pdf. Zugegriffen am 29.03.2018

  19. Burmann C, Blinda L, Nitschke A (2003) L i M-ARBEITSPAPIERE

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashworth G, Kavaratzis M (2009) Beyond the logo: brand management for cities. J Brand Manag 16(8):520–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crutzen N, Van Bockhaven J, Schaltegger S, Giffinger R Special issue call for papers from Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/call_for_papers.htm?id=7294. Zugegriffen am 30.01.2018

  22. Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M (2018) Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities? Land Use Policy 73:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM (2015) Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J Urban Technol 22(1):3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Letaifa SB (2015) How to strategize smart cities: Revealing the SMART model. J Bus Res 68(7):1414–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bibri SE, Krogstie J (2017) Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain Cities Soc 31:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kummitha RKR, Crutzen N (2017) How do we understand smart cities? an evolutionary perspective. Cities 67:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Becker J, Knackstedt R, Pöppelbuß J (2009) Developing maturity models for IT management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(3):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Bruin T, Freeze R, Kaulkarni U, Rosemann M. (2005) Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Campbell B, Underwood J, Bunker D (Hrsg) Australasian conference on information systems (ACIS), Nov. 30- Dec. 2, 2005, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  30. European Parliament (2014) Mapping smart cities in the EU. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, European Parliament, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jaekel M (2015) Smart City wird Realität – Wegweiser für neue Urbanitäten in der Digitalmoderne. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen B. 6 components for smart cities. Smart cities wheel. UBM’s future cities. http://www.ubmfuturecities.com/author.asp?section_id=219&doc_id=524053. Zugegriffen am 12.08.2016

  33. NEC Smart city. NEC Smart City solutions support cities as they evolve. http://www.nec.com/en/global/ad/campaign/smartcity/. Zugegriffen am 23.08.2016

  34. IBM (2013) How to reinvent a city. Mayors’ lessons from the Smart Cities Challenge. IBM Smarter Cities. White Paper. New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. IDC Continous Intelligence Service (2012) IDC smart cities benchmark – Deutschland 2012, Zusammenfassung für Städte und Gemeinden, IDC Central Europe GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  36. The Scottish Government (2015) Scottish cities alliance, urban tide: smart cities maturity model and self-assessment tool, guidance note

    Google Scholar 

  37. British Standards Institute (BSI) (2014) PAS 180 Smart city terminology

    Google Scholar 

  38. CMMI Product Team (2010) CMMI for development, Version 1.3. Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gregor S, Jones D (2007) The anatomy of a design theory. J Assoc Inf Syst 8(5):312–335

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gregor S, Hevner AR (2013) Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q 37(2):337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hevner A, Chatterjee S (2010) Design research in information systems. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger M, Chatterjee S (2008) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 24(3):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Garau C, Masala F, Pinna F (2015) Benchmarking smart urban mobility: a study on Italian cities. In: Gervasi O, et al (Hrsg) ICCSA 2015, Part II, Lecture notes in computer science, Bd 9156, S 612–623

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp Policy 15(2):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Papa E, Lauwers D (2015) Smart mobility: opportunity or threat to innovate places and cities? 20th international conference on urban planning and regional development in the information society, REAL CORP 2015, S 543–550

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lahrmann G, Marx F, Mettler T, Winter R, Wortmann F (2011) Inductive design of maturity models: applying the rasch algorithm for design science research. In: Jain H, Sinha AP, Vitharana P (Hrsg) DESRIST 2011, LNCS 6629. Springer,Heidelberg, S 176–191

    Google Scholar 

  47. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (21 May 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kodukula S, Zimmermann M (2013) EcoMobility SHIFT – Assessment and Audit Scheme: Indicator Description. ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability e.V, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gühnemann A (2016) CH4LLENGE monitoring and evaluation manual: assessing the impact of measures and evaluating mobility planning processes. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  50. WBCSD – World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2015) Methodology and indicator calculation method for sustainable mobility

    Google Scholar 

  51. City of Vienna (2017) Fachkonzept Mobilität – STEP 2025. https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/strategien/step/step2025/fachkonzepte/mobilitaet/. Zugegriffen am 12.09.2017

  52. International Standards Organization (ISO) (2014) ISO 37120:2014 – sustainable development of communities – indicators for city services and quality of life

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Diese Arbeit ist Teil des Projekts „Nachhaltiger Konsum von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie in der digitalen Gesellschaft − Dialog und Transformation durch offene Innovation“. Das Projekt wird vom Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur des Landes Niedersachsen und der VolkswagenStiftung aus Landesmitteln des Niedersächsischen Vorab gefördert (Projektnummer VWZN3037).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Deutschland

    Danielle Warnecke, Rikka Wittstock & Frank Teuteberg

Authors
  1. Danielle Warnecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rikka Wittstock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Frank Teuteberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle Warnecke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Jorge Marx Gómez

  2. Fakultät II - Department für Informatik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Andreas Solsbach

  3. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Thomas Klenke

  4. HTW Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Volker Wohlgemuth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Warnecke, D., Wittstock, R., Teuteberg, F. (2019). Nachhaltige Mobilität messbar machen – Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Reifegradmodells für urbane Mobilitätsstrategien. In: Marx Gómez, J., Solsbach, A., Klenke, T., Wohlgemuth, V. (eds) Smart Cities/Smart Regions – Technische, wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Innovationen. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25210-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation