Advertisement

Institutional Justice as a Condition for the Regional Acceptance of Global Order: The African Union and the Protection of Civilians

  • Matthias DembinskiEmail author
  • Dirk Peters
Chapter
Part of the Studien des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung book series (SLIHSFK)

Abstract

This chapter argues that conflicts about liberal global norms can often be understood as conflicts about procedural justice in the application of those norms rather than as conflicts about their substance. Regional organizations, which are key actors for the acceptance of global norms on the regional and global level, respond to perceived procedural injustice by contesting the underlying regime. Consequently, reducing procedural injustice in the application of global norms will enhance the acceptance of those norms at the regional level. To illustrate this link, the chapter compares the response of the African Union (AU) to the application of global protection norms in two cases. The application of the Responsibility to Protect in Libya in 2011 resulted in attacks of the AU on the norm, whereas the application of the Protections of Civilians in Côte d’Ivoire in the same year was supported by the AU even though it resulted in the removal of an incumbent head of government as well. The difference lay less in the norms or their implications themselves but in the procedures through which they were applied. Whereas the AU was circumvented in the Libya case, it had effective voice in the Côte d’Ivoire case. Procedures for applying global norms should thus take into account that regional actors will oppose global norms when they recognize that they do not have a say in how they are implemented in their region.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58, 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, S. (2012). Libya and the R2P. Global Centre for the Responsibility To Protect: Occasional Paper Series, 3. http://www.globalr2p.org/media/files/libyaandr2poccasionalpaper-1.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.
  4. Adebajo, A. (2010). Pax Nigeriana and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2, 414–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. African Union. (2005). The common African position on the proposed reform of the United Nations: The Ezulwini Consensus, Executive Council 7th extraordinary session, Ext/EX.CL/2 (VII), Addis Ababa, 7–8 March.Google Scholar
  6. African Union. (2008). Report of the African Union-United Nations Panel on Modalities for Support to African Union Peacekeeping Operations, A/63/666; S/2008/813, 31 December.Google Scholar
  7. African Union. (2011a). Communiqué of the 261st meeting of the Peace and Security Council, PSC/PR/COMM(CCLXI), Addis Ababa, 23 February.Google Scholar
  8. African Union. (2011b). Communiqué of the 265th meeting of the Peace and Security Council, PSC/PR/COMM.2 (CCLXV), Addis Ababa, 10 March.Google Scholar
  9. African Union. (2012). Report of the Chairperson of the Commission on the Partnership between the African Union and the United Nations on Peace and Security: Towards greater strategic and political coherence, PSC/PR/2.CCCVII, 9 January.Google Scholar
  10. African Union. (2013). Report of the Chairperson of the Commission on the African Union-United Nations Partnership: The need for greater coherence, PSC/AHG/3.CCCXCVII, 23 September.Google Scholar
  11. Alder-Nissen, R., & Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Aris, S., & Wenger, A. (Eds.). (2014). Regional organisations and security: Conceptions and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. BBC News. (2007). Hardtalk: African Union ʻIgnored’ over Libyan crisis. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/hardtalk/9436093. Accessed 26 Nov 2014.
  14. Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. D. (2011). The new politics of protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benner, T., et al. (2015). Effective and responsible protection from atrocity crimes: Towards global action. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Betts, A., & Orchard, P. (2014). Introduction: The normative institutionalization—implementation gap. In A. Betts & P. Orchard (Eds.), Implementation and world politics: How international norms change practice (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cammaert, P. (2013). The UN intervention brigade in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Issue Brief: International Peace Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59, 801–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coleman, K. P. (2011). Innovations in ‘African Solutions to African Problems’: The evolving practice of regional peacekeeping in Sub-Sahara Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(4), 517–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daase, C. (2013). Die Legalisierung der Legitimität. Zur Kritik der Schutzverantwortung als Emerging Norm. Die Friedens-Warte, 88(1/2), 41–62.Google Scholar
  21. Dembinski, M., & Schott, B. (2014). Regional security arrangements as a filter for norm diffusion: The African Union, the European Union and the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(2), 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Waal, A. (2013). African roles in the Libyan conflict of 2011. International Affairs, 89(2), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Global Research. (2011). Over 200 African leaders: NATO’s Libyan War part of plan to recolonize continent. Global Research, 25 August. https://www.globalresearch.ca/over-200-african-leaders-nato-s-libyan-war-part-of-plan-to-recolonize-continent/26200. Accessed 29 Oct 2018.
  25. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofmann, G. P. (2014). Im Streit gestärkt oder umstrittener als behauptet? Zehn Jahre diplomatische Kontroversen über die Schutzverantwortung. HSFK Report, 9. Frankfurt a. M.: Leibniz-Institut Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.Google Scholar
  28. Holt, V., Taylor, G., & Kelly, M. (2009). Protecting civilians in the context of UN peace operations: Successes, setbacks and remaining challenges. New York: UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations.Google Scholar
  29. Kagame, P. (2011). Intervening in Libya was the right thing to do. New African, 506, 28.Google Scholar
  30. Kieh, G. K. (2013). The African Union, the responsibility to protect and conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region. Michigan State International Law Review, 21(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
  31. Kirchner, E. L., & Domingues, R. (2011). The security governance of regional organizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In K. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mail and Guardian Online. (2011a). Mbeki: We should learn from Libya’s experiences. http://mg.co.za/article/2011-11-05-mbeki-we-should-learn-from-libyas-experiences/. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  34. Mail and Guardian Online. (2011b). Zuma lashes Nato for ‘abusing’ UN Resolutions of Libya. http://mg.co.za/article/2011-06-14-zuma-lashes-nato-for-abusing-un-resolutions-on-libya/. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  35. Mazrui, A. A. (1967). Towards a Pax Africana. A study of ideology and ambition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mbeki, T. (2011). International law and the future of Africa. Address at the AGM of the law society of the northern provinces, Sun City. http://www.thabombekifoundation.org.za/Pages/address-by-the-patron-of-the-tmf,-thabo-mbeki,-at-the-agm-of-the-law-society-of-the-northern-provinces-sun-city,-november-5.aspx. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  37. McKaiser, E. (2011). Looking an international relations gift horse in the mouth: SA’s response to the Libyan crisis: The 2011 Ruth First Memorial Lecture. African Studies, 71(1), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mercer, J. (2010). Emotional Beliefs. International Organization, 64(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mercer, J. (2013). Emotion and strategy in the Korean war. International Organization, 67(2), 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Merkel, A. (2012). Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel anlässlich der Tagung des zivilen und militärischen Spitzenpersonals der Bundeswehr in der Akademie der Bundeswehr für Information und Kommunikation. http://www.bundesregierung.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Reden/2012/10/2012-10-22rede-merkel-bundeswehr.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  41. Müller, H., & Druckman, D. (2014). Justice in security negotiations. Special Issue of International Negotiations, 19(3), 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Murithi, T. (2009). The African Union’s transition from non-intervention to non-indifference: An ad hoc approach to the responsibility to protect? International Politics and Security, 1, 90–106.Google Scholar
  43. Museveni, Y. (2011). Libya needs dialogue. New Vision. http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/12/749765. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  44. New York Times. (2011). African Union opposes warrant for Qaddafi. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/03/world/africa/03african.html. Accessed 26 Oct 2018.
  45. Omorogbe, E. Y. (2012). The African Union, Responsibility to Protect and the Libyan crisis. Netherlands International Law Journal, 59(2), 141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Open Letter by “Concerned Africans” (2011). Open letter by “Concerned Africans” condemning intervention in the African nation. http://politicsweb.co.za/documents/nato-war-ofaggression-in-libya-should-end-immedia. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  47. Puglierin, J., Feyrock, S., & van Diepen, Y. (2014). Ertüchtigen statt Wegsehen. Eine deutsche Initiative soll das Krisenmanagement der GSVP verbessern. Internationale Politik, 14, 60–65.Google Scholar
  48. Rieff, D. (2011). R2P, R.I.P. New York Times, November 7.Google Scholar
  49. Saurette, P. (2006). You dissin me? Humiliation and post 9-11 politics. Review of International Studies, 32(3), 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimmelfennig, F. (2002). Introduction: The impact of international organizations on the Central and Eastern European states: conceptual and theoretical issues. In R. H. Linden (Ed.), Norms and nannies. The impact of international organizations on the Central and East European states (pp. 1–29), Lanham: Rowman & Littelfield.Google Scholar
  51. Sigmund, K., Fehr, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2002). The economics of fair play. Scientific American, 286(1), 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thibault, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Tieku, T. (2004). Explaining the clash and accommodation of interests of mayor actors in the creation of the African Union. African Affairs, 103, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tull, D. M. & Lacher, W. (2012). Die Folgen des Libyen-Konflikts für Afrika: Gräben zwischen der AU und dem Westen, Destabilisierung der Sahelzone. SWP-Studien 2012/S 08, März 2012.Google Scholar
  55. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 595–629). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  56. United Nations Security Council. (2010). Resolution 1962, The situation in Côte d’Ivoire, S/RES/1962, New York, 20 December.Google Scholar
  57. United Nations DPKO/DFS. (2010). Draft DPKO/DFS operational concept on the protection of civilians in United Nations peacekeeping operations. http://www.peacekeeping.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/100129-DPKO-DFS-POC-Operational-Concept.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  58. United Nations Security Council. (2011a). Resolution 1975, S/RES 1975 (2011), New York, 30 March.Google Scholar
  59. United Nations Security Council. (2011b). 6627th Meeting, S/PV.6627, New York, 4 October.Google Scholar
  60. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) (2011). Framework for drafting comprehensive Protection of Civilians (POC) strategies in UN peacekeeping operations, 2011. http://www.refworld.org/docid/523998464.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  61. Wallensteen, P., & Bjurner, A. (2015). Regional organizations and peacemaking. Challengers to the UN? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Ward, S. (2013). Race, status, and Japanese revisionism in the early 1930s. Security Studies, 22(4), 607–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Welch, D. (1993). Justice and the genesis of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, P. D. (2007). From non-intervention to non-indifference: The origins and development of the African Union’s security culture. African Affairs, 106(423), 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams, P. D. (2009). The ‘Responsibility to Protect’, norm localization, and African international society. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(3), 392–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, P. D. (2011). War and conflict in Africa. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wisotzki, S. (2013). Notfalls mit Gewalt? Globale Gerechtigkeit und die Rechtfertigung militärischer Intervention. Zeitschrift für Friedens-und Konfliktforschung, 2(1), 98–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wolf, R. (2011). Respect and disrespect in international politics: The significance of status recognition. International Theory, 3(1), 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zähringer, N. (2013). Norm evolution within and across the African Union and the United Nations: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) as a contested norm. South African Journal of International Affairs, 20(2), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF/HSFK)Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations