Advertisement

Introduction: The Role of Justice in International Cooperation and Conflict

  • Caroline FehlEmail author
  • Dirk Peters
  • Simone Wisotzki
  • Jonas Wolff
Chapter
Part of the Studien des Leibniz-Instituts Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung book series (SLIHSFK)

Abstract

The introductory chapter outlines the rationale of the volume and the shared conceptual approach of the chapters. It situates the specific focus of the book on empirically observable justice conflicts and their consequences within the broader literature on justice, peace, and global governance, provides shared definitions of key terms, and sketches the research questions addressed jointly by all contributors. The introduction presents key insights and overarching research findings and concludes with a brief summary of the book’s chapters.

References

  1. Aggestam, K., & Björkdahl, A. (2013). Rethinking peacebuilding. The quest for just peace in the Middle East and the Western Balkans. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Albin, C. (1999). Justice, fairness, and negotiation: Theory and reality. In P. Berton, H. Kimura, & I. Zartman (Eds.), International negotiation. Actors, structures/processes, values (pp. 257–290). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Albin, C. (2001). Justice and fairness in international negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albin, C. (2009). Peace vs. justice—And beyond. In J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, & I. Zartman (Eds.), The sage handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 580–594). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2010). The role of justice in negotiation. In D. M. Kilgour & C. Eden (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation, advances in group decision and negotiation (pp. 109–119). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2014a). Bargaining over weapons: Justice and effectiveness in arms control negotiations. International Negotiation, 19(3), 426–458.Google Scholar
  7. Albin, C., & Druckman, D. (2014b). Procedures matter: Justice and effectiveness in international trade negotiations. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 1014–1042.Google Scholar
  8. Baumgart-Ochse, C., & Wolf, K. D. (2019). Religious NGOs at the United Nations: Polarizers or mediators?. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Baumgart-Ochse, C., Schörnig, N., Wisotzki, S., & Wolff, J. (2011). Auf dem Weg zu Just Peace Governance. Beiträge zum Auftakt des neuen Forschungsprogramms der HSFK. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumgart-Ochse, C., Glaab, K., Smith, P., & Smythe, E. (2017). Faith in justice? Special issue of globalizations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture. Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, C. (1992). International relations theory. New York: New normative approaches.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, C. (2002). Sovereignty, rights and justice. International political theory today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. (2004). The preventive use of force: A cosmopolitan institutional proposal. Ethics & International Affairs, 18(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caney, S. (2005). Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daase, C. & Humrich, C. (2011). Just Peace Governance. Research program of the Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. PRIF Working Papers, 1. Frankfurt a. M.: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt. https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_publikationen/PRIF_WP_01.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
  19. Daase, C., Geis, A., Fehl, C., & Kolliarakis, G. (2015). Recognition in international relations. Rethinking a political concept in a global context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dembinski, M. (2017). Procedural justice and global order: Explaining African reaction to the application of global protection norms. European Journal of International Relations, 23(4), 809–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Douglas, M. (1989). A typology of cultures. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie (Ed.), Kultur und Gesellschaft. Verhandlungen des 24. Deutschen Soziologentages 1988 in Zürich (pp. 85–97). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  22. Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1996). The world of goods. Towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Druckman, D., & Albin, C. (2010). Distributive justice and the durability of peace agreements. Review of International Studies, 37(3), 1137–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunne, T. (2009). Liberalism, international terrorism, and democratic wars. International Relations, 23(1), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Erskine, T. (2002). “Citizen of Nowhere” or “the Point Where Circles Intersect”? Impartialist and embedded cosmopolitanisms. Review of International Studies, 28, 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erskine, T. (2008). Embedded cosmopolitanism: Duties to strangers and enemies in a world of ‘Dislocated Communities’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans, G., & Sahnoun, M. (2002). The responsibility to protect. Foreign Affairs, 81(6), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forst, R. (2007). Das Recht auf Rechtfertigung. Elemente einer konstruktivistischen Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  29. Forst, R. (2010). Zu einer Kritischen Theorie transnationaler Gerechtigkeit. In C. Broszies & H. Hahn (Eds.), Globale Gerechtigkeit (pp. 439–464). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  30. Fraser, N. (2006). Mapping the feminist imagination: From redistribution to recognition to representation. In U. Degener & B. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Die Neuverhandlung sozialer Gerechtigkeit Feministische Analysen und Perspektiven (pp. 37–52). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice. Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Honneth, A. (1992). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order. Power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutchings, K. (2010). Global ethics. An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, R. (2000). The global covenant: Human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Jost, J., & Kay, A. (2010). Social justice. In S. Fiske, L. Gardner, & D. Gilbert (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1122–1165). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Kluegel, J., Mason, D., & Wegener, B. (1995). Social justice and political change. Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lebow, R. (2008). A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lerner, M. (1980). A belief in a just world a fundamental delusion. New York: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Linklater, A. (2001). Citizenship, humanity, and cosmopolitan harm conventions. International Political Science Review, 22(3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Linklater, A. (2006). The harm principle and global ethics. Global Society, 20(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu, C. (2000). The one and many faces of cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 244–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, D. (1999). On nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, D. (2005). Global egalitarianism. The Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Montada, L., & Lerner, M. (1996). Current societal concerns about justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Müller, H. (2013). Peace. Interdisciplinary perspectives on a contested relationship. In G. Hellmann (Ed.), Justice and peace: Good things do not always go together (pp. 43–68). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  50. Müller, H., & Druckman, D. (2014). Introduction: Justice in security negotiations. International Negotiation, 19(3), 339–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Müller, H., & Wunderlich, C. (2013). Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: Interests, conflicts, and justice. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  52. Nagel, T. (2005). The problem of global justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33, 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O‘Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue. A constructivist account of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pogge, T. (1992). Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics, 103(1), 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  56. Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rawls, J. (2001). Gerechtigkeit als Fairness. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  59. Schrenker, M., & Wegener, B. (2007). Was ist gerecht? Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus dem International Social Justice Project 1991–2007 International Social Justice Project. Arbeitsbericht 150. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://www.sowi.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/empisoz/forschung/archiv/isjp/publication/ISJP_WP_150. Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
  60. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shapcott, R. (2010). International ethics. A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shue, H. (1980). Basic rights. Subsistence, affluence and U.S. foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sigmund, K., Fehr, E., & Nowak, M. A. (2002). The economics of fair play. Scientific American, 1, 83–87.Google Scholar
  64. Téson, F. (2003). The liberal case for humanitarian intervention. In J. L. Holzgrefe & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Humanitarian intervention. Ethical, legal, and political dilemmas (pp. 93–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tyler, T. (2012). Justice theory. In P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 344–362). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tyler, T., & Smith, H. (1998). Social justice and social movements. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & L. Gardner (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 595–629). Boston: Distributed exclusively by Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  68. Walzer, M. (2006). Sphären der Gerechtigkeit. Ein Plädoyer für Pluralität und Gleichheit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  69. Wegener, B., & Liebig, S. (2000). Is the “Inner Wall” here to stay? Justice ideolgies in unified Germany. Social Justice Research, 13, 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Welch, D. (1993). Justice and the genesis of war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Welch, D. (2014). The justice motive in international relations: Past, present, and future. International Negotiation, 19(3), 410–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Welch, D. (2017). The justice motive in east Asia’s territorial disputes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wheeler, N. (1992). Pluralist or solidarist conceptions of international society. Millennium, 21(3), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wheeler, N. (2000). Saving strangers. Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zartman, I. (1997). Conflict and order: Justice in negotiation. International Political Science Review, 18(2), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zartman, I. (1999). Justice in negotiation. In P. Berton, H. Kimura, & I. Zartman (Eds.), International negotiation. Actors, structures, processes, values, justice in negotiation (pp. 291–307). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  77. Zartman, I. (2008). Negotiation and conflict management. Essays on theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Zartman, I., & Kremenyuk, V. (2005). Peace versus justice: Negotiating forward- and backward-looking outcomes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  79. Zartman, I., Druckman, D., Jensen, L., Pruitt, D., & Young, H. (1996). Negotiation as a search for justice. International Negotiation, 1(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Fehl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dirk Peters
    • 1
  • Simone Wisotzki
    • 1
  • Jonas Wolff
    • 1
  1. 1.Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF/HSFK)Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations