Abstract
Online reviews and recommendations play a major role in consumers’ decision making. Prior research shows that consumers are heavily influenced by the visible opinions of others when they decide whether to buy a product or not (Babic Rosario et al., 2016). However, less is known about the role of different review sources and message types: Do sources that are similar to the consumers (e.g., reviewers with the same age) always have a stronger influence or are there circumstances under which people are also more open toward information from dissimilar sources (that may provide more novel information)? How does the type of arguments in the review (e.g., whether they focus on details or “the big picture”) affect the persuasiveness of the review? Prior work on these moderating variables of review influence provided mixed results (e.g., Brandes et al., 2011; Lin and Xu, 2017).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aerts, G.; Smits, T.; and P. W. Verlegh (2017), “How online consumer reviews are influenced by the language and valence of prior reviews: A construal level perspective,” in: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 75, 855-864.
Babić Rosario, A.; Sotgiu, F.; De Valck, K. and T. H. Bijmolt (2016), “The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53(3), 297-318.
Brandes, L. and I. Nolte (2011), “Where Do the Joneses Go on Vacation? Social Distance and the Influence of Online Reviews on Product Sales”
Freitas, A. L.; Gollwitzer, P.; & Y. Trope (2004), “The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts,” in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 40(6), 739-752.
Fujita, K.; Trope, Y.; Liberman, N. and M. Levin-Sagi (2006), “Construal levels and self-control,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 90(3), 351.
Hansen, J. and M. Wänke (2010), “Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth,” in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 36(11), 1576-1588.
Liberman, N. and Y. Trope (1998), “The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory,” in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 75(1), 5.
Liberman, N. and Y. Trope (2008), “The psychology of transcending the here and now,” in: Science, Vol. 322(5905), 1201-1205.
Liberman, N.; Trope, Y. and C. Wakslak (2007), “Construal level theory and consumer behavior,” in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 17(2), 113-117.
Lin, C. A. and X. Xu (2017), “Effectiveness of online consumer reviews: The influence of valence, reviewer ethnicity, social distance and source trustworthiness,” in: Internet Research, Vol.27(2), 362-380.
Sungur, H.; Hartmann, T. and G. M. van Koningsbruggen (2016), “Abstract mindsets increase believability of spatially distant online messages,” in: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.7, 1056.
Trope, Y. and N. Liberman (2003), “Temporal construal,” in: Psychological Review, Vol. 110(3), 403.
Trope, Y. and N. Liberman (2010), “Construal-level theory of psychological distance,” in: Psychological Review, Vol. 117(2), 440.
Vallacher, R. R. and D. M. Wegner (1987), “What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior,” in: Psychological Review, Vol: 94(1), 3.
Wakslak, C. and Y. Trope (2009), “The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates,” in: Psychological Science, Vol: 20(1), 52-58.
Winter, S. and L. Schulte-Bockholt (2018), “When Do We Trust Online Reviews by Similar vs. Dissimilar Users? An Application of Construal Level Theory”, in: Advances in Advertising Research IX (pp. 287-300). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hu, X., Winter, S. (2019). The Effects of Abstract vs. Concrete Mindsets on the Persuasiveness of Online Reviews: A Construal Level Perspective. In: Bigne, E., Rosengren, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research X. European Advertising Academy. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24878-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24878-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24877-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24878-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)