Skip to main content

Ruth Zimmerling’s Globalization and Democracy, fifteen years on

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1964 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In 2003, Ruth Zimmerling wrote an article titled Globalization and democracy: a framework for discussion, which was an outcome of the second annual meeting of the Tampere Club (Zimmerling 2005). The aim of that article was to offer “a systematic overview over ideas and assumptions about the relationship between globalization and democracy” (Zimmerling 2005: 61). As many other of her works, this was conceived as a contribution to bring some clarity and systematization to a discussion that back then in 2003 was already fashionable and overwhelmingly omnipresent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Achen, Christopher, and Larry Bartels (2016): Democracy for Realists: Why Elections do not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsina, Victoria, and José Luis Martí (2019): The Birth of the CrowdLaw Movement: Tech-Based Citizen Participation, Legitimacy and the Quality of Lawmaking. In: Analyse und Kritik, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele (2008): The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Towards Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, Daniele, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and Raffaele Marchetti, eds. (2012): Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin (2013): If Mayors Ruled the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin (2017): Cool Cities. Urban Sovereignty and the Fix for Global Warming, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, Jamie (2018): The People vs. Tech: How the Internet is Killing Democracy (and How We Save It), London: Ebury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai (2006): The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, New Have: Yale Unversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai (2011): The Penguin and the Leviathan. How Cooperation Triumphs Over Self-Interest. Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Paul S. (2007): Global Legal Pluralism. In: Southern California Law Review 80, 1155-1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Paul S. (2012): Global Legal Pluralism. A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (2007): Democracy Across Borders. From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (2010): Democratising the Global Order: From Communicative Freedom to Communicative Power. In: Review of International Studies 36, 431-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (2015): Democratizing International Law: A Republican Reading of Habermas’ Cosmopolitan Project. In: Tom Bailey, ed.: Deprovincializing Habermas. Global Perspectives. London, New York and New Delhi: Routledge and Taylor & Francis Group, 50-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (2016): From Self-Legislation to Self-Determination: Democracy and the New Circumstances of Global Politics. In: Critical Horizons 17, 123-134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, Daniel, and Steven Slaughter (2014): Global Democratic Theory: Problems and Possibilities. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Jason (2016): Against Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen, and Robert Keohane (2006): The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. In: Ethics and International Affairs 20, 405-434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, Brian (2007): The Myth of the Rational Voter. Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, Sabino (2015): Global Administrative Law: The State of the Art. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law 13: 2, 465-468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, Sabino (2017): Research Handbook on Global Administrative Law. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (1997-2001): The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Willey-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (2012): Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (2013): Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Thomas (2010): Democratic Legitimacy and International Institutions. In: Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas, eds.: The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Thomas (2012): The Legitimacy of International Institutions. In: Andrei Marmor, ed.: Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York: Routledge, 380-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua, and Charles Sabel (2006): Global Democracy? In: New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37: 4, 763-797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colás, Alejandro (2002): International Civil Society. Social Movements in World Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Stephen, and Jay Blumler (2009): The Internet and Democratic Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Stephen, and Peter Shane (2011), eds.: Connectinc Democracy. Online Consultation and the Flow of Political Communication. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert (1999): Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In: Casiano Hacker-Cordón and Ian Shapiro, eds.: Democracy’s Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Búrca, Gráinne, Robert O. Keohane and Charles F. Sabel (2013): New Modes of Pluralist Global Governance. In: New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 45: 1, 723-786.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Búrca, Gráinne, Robert O. Keohane and Charles F. Sabel (2014): Global Experimentalist Governance. In: British Journal of Political Science 44: 3, 477-486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, Richard (2006): Deliberative Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Joel P. Trachtman, eds. (2009): Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, Roberto S., and Yascha Mounk (2016): The Democratic Disconnect. In: Journal of Democracy 27: 3, 5-17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E. (2007): Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. In: Philosophy & Public Affairs 35: 1, 40-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert E. (2010): Global democracy: in the beginning. In: International Theory 2: 2, 175-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2006): Does the Constitutionalization of International Law Still Have a Chance? In: Jürgen Habermas: The Divided West, ed. and trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity, 115-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2013): A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society? In: Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40, 226-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen (2015): European Citizens and European Peoples. The Problem of Transnationalizing Democracy. In: The Lure of Technocracy, trans. C. Cronin. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, Robert (2008): The End of Globalization Debate: A Review Essay. In: Harvard Law Review 121: 6, 1528-1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary (2003): Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Bruce, and Jeremy Nowak (2018): The New Localism: How Cities Can Thrive in the Age of Populism. New York: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John (2003): Global Civil Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John (2010): The Life and Death of Democracy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John (2017): When Trees Fall, Monkeys Scatter. Rethinking Democracy in China. New Jersey: WSPC.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert, Stephen Macedo and Andrew Moravsik (2009): Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism. In: International Organization 63: 1, 1-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Stephen D. (2017): Grave New World: The End of Globalization and the Return of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch and Richard Stewart (2005): The emergence of global administrative law. In: Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 3-4, 15-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klabbers, Jan, Anne Peters and Geir Ulfstein, eds. (2011): The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2011): Is Global Democracy Possible? In: European Journal of International Relations, 17: 3, 519-542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisch, Nico (2010): Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krisch, Nico (2014): The Decay of Consent: International Law in the Age of Global Public Goods. In: American Journal of International Law 108, 1-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumm, Mattias (2009): The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State. In: Jeffery L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, eds.: Ruling the World? International Law, Global Governance, Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumm, Mattias (2016): Constituent Power, Cosmopolitan Constitutionalism and Post-Positivist Law. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law 14, 697-711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuyper, Jonathan (2016): “Global Democracy”. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/global-democracy/.

  • Kymlicka, Will (2001): Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Jaron (2013): Who Owns the Future? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, Jaron (2018): Ten Arguments for Deleting your Social Media Accounts Right Now. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt (2018): How Dempocracies Die. What History Reveals About Our Future. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Terry (2008): Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1997): From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes of Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. In: Journal of Public Policy 17: 2, 139-167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, Raffaele (2008): Global Democracy: For and Against. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí, José Luis (2010): A Global Republic to Prevent Global Domination. In: Diacritica 24: 2, 31-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martí, José Luis (2017): Democratic Legitimacy and the Sources of International Law. In: Samantha Besson and Jean D’Aspremont, eds.: The Oxford Handbook on the Sources of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 724-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David (2003): On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David (2010): Cosmopolitanism: A Critique. In: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 5: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mounk, Yascha (2018): The People vs. Democracy. Why our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017): Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner (2016): What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart (2018): Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Beth S. (2009): Wikigovernment. How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. New York: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Beth S. (2015): Smart Citizens, Smarter State. The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Beth S. (2019): CrowdLaw: Collective Intelligence and Lamaking. In: Analyse und Kritik, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Anne (2005): Global Constitutionalism Revisited. In: International Legal Theory 11, 39-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Anne (2011): Dual Democracy. In: Jan Klabbers, Anne Peters and Geir Ulfstein, eds.: The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 263-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Anne (2012): Are We Moving Towards Constitutionalization of the World Community? In: Antonio Cassese, ed.: Realizing Utopia. The Future of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118-135.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Anne (2015): Global Constitutionalism. In: Michael T. Gibbons, ed.: The Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Chichester and Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip (2010): Legitimate International Institutions: A Neorepublican Perspective. In: Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas, eds.: The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip (2015): The Republican Law of Peoples: A Restatement. In: Barbara Buckinx, Jonathan Trejo-Mathys and Timothy Waligore, eds.: Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives. London: Routledge, 37-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1993): The Law of the Peoples. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, Howard (2002): Smart Mobs. The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, Howard (2012): Net Smart. How to Thrive Online. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani (2011): The Globalization Paradox. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, David (2018): How Democracy Ends. New York: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia (1996): Loosing Control? Sovereignty in the Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia (2001): The Global City. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia (2008): Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, Armin, and Wolfgang Streeck (2013): Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz (1998): Demokratische Politik in der internationalen Ökonomie. In: Michael Greven, ed.: Demokratie – eine Kultur des Westens? Opladen: Leske Budrich, 81-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, Fritz (1999): Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwöbel-Patel, Christine (2011): Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004): A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somin, Ilya (2016): Democracy and Political Ignorance. Why Smaller Government is Smarter. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tännsjö, Torbjörn (2008): Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trachtman, Joel P. (2013): The Future of International Law. Global Global Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Zeynep (2017): Twitter and Tear Gas. The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander (2003): Why a World State is Inevitable? In: European Journal of International Relations 9: 4, 491-542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling, Ruth (2003): Globalización y democracia: un marco para la discusión. In: Quórum. Revista de pensamiento iberoamericano 7, 62-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling, Ruth (2005): Globalization and Democracy: a Framework for Discussion. In: Ruth Zimmerling, ed.: Globalisation and Democracy. The Tampere Club Series, Vol. I, Tampere: Tampere University Press, 61-87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luis Martí .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martí, J.L. (2019). Ruth Zimmerling’s Globalization and Democracy, fifteen years on. In: Marker, K., Schmitt, A., Sirsch, J. (eds) Demokratie und Entscheidung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24529-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24529-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24528-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24529-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics