Abstract
Manipulation of the human germline is sometimes criticised as a severe intervention into human nature. In order to assess the tenability of this claim, different uses of the term “human nature” and distinct scientific and clinical contexts must be differentiated. The first live birth of an edited human child will probably take the form of an unproven intervention and not a clinical trial. As an unproven intervention, germline manipulation must be regarded as a severe intervention into the nature of a prospective newborn. Nevertheless, once the technique of germline manipulation can be regarded as a safe therapeutic option, and if its use is restricted to the prevention of severe genetic diseases, it can no longer be regarded as a particularly severe intervention into human nature. However, such a use would make human nature the object of technoscience and the edited human beings would have to be regarded as biofacts, i. e., a form of incarnated and living technological design. This introduces a new quality into the notion of “human nature”, which can be regarded as ethically acceptable, as long as the intervention is restricted to the prevention of severe genetic diseases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayertz, Kurt. 2003. Human Nature: How Normative Might It Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 131–150.
Bernard, Andreas. 2014. Kinder machen. Samenspender, Leihmütter, Künstliche Befruchtung. Neue Reproduktionstechnologien und die Ordnung der Familie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Habermas, Jurgen. 2013. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Haker, Hille. 2013. Eine Ethik der Elternschaft. In Kinderwunsch und Reproduktionsmedizin. Ethische Herausforderungen der technisierten Fortpflanzung, Maio, Giovanni, et al. (eds.), 269–292. München: Karl Alber.
Heyd, David. 2005. Die menschliche Natur: ein Oxymoron? In Die menschliche Natur. Welchen und wieviel Wert hat sie? Bayertz, Kurt (ed.), 52–72. Paderborn: Mentis.
Hikabe, Orie, et al. 2016. Reconstitution in Vitro of the Entire Cycle of the Mouse Female Germ Line. Nature 539: 299–303.
Illioi, Elena Christiana, and Susan Golombok. 2015. Psychological Adjustment in Adolescents conceived by Assisted Reproduction Techniques: a systematic Review. Human Reproduction Update 21: 84–96.
Kang, Xiangjin, et al. 2016. Introducing Precise Genetic Modifications into Human 3PN Embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated Genome Editing. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 33: 581–588.
Liang, Puping, et al. 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Editing in Human Tripronuclear Zygotes. Protein Cell 6: 363–372.
Ma, Hong, et al. 2017. Correction of a Pathogenic Gene Mutation in Human Embryos. Nature 548: 413–419.
Meier-Credner, Anne. 2016. Was bedeutet Embryonenadoption aus der Perspektive der entstehenden Menschen? Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 62: 151–164.
Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. Das Zeitalter der Technowissenschaften. In Strukturwandel der Wissenschaft. Positionen zum Epochenbruch, Nordmann, Alfred, et al. (eds.), 24–38. Weilerwist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Popper, Karl Raimund. 2005. Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Spenderkinder. 2006. Meinungen und Geschichten. http://www.spenderkinder.de/ueberuns/meinungenundgeschichten. Accessed 08 March 2018.
Roughley, Neil. 2005. Was heißt „menschliche Natur“? Begriffliche Differenzierungen und normative Ansatzpunkte. In Die menschliche Natur. Welchen und wieviel Wert hat sie?
Bayertz, Kurt (ed.), 133–156. Paderborn: Mentis.
Savulescu, Julian, et al. 2015. The Moral Imperative to Continue Gene Editing Research on Human Embryos. Protein & Cell 6: 476–479.
Tang, Lichun, et al. 2017. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Gene Editing in Human Zygotes Using Cas9 Protein. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 292: 525–533.
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Human Genome Editing. Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 28 October 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Primc, N. (2018). Germline Modifications as a Severe Intervention into Human Nature. In: Braun, M., Schickl, H., Dabrock, P. (eds) Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22660-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22660-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22659-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22660-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)