Abstract
This chapter explores how transparency and surveillance practices intersect with the emergence of proactive forms of governance. Driven by digital transformations, we see the emergence of novel organizational practices—and scholarly discussions—of predictive policing that require our attention. What we suggest is that rather than a clear-cut shift from reactive to proactive forms of governance, digital transformations and data analytics create particular conditions for knowledge production, introduce new logics of temporality, and raise important questions about authority and legitimacy. The chapter contributes to discussions about transparency and governance by highlighting how processes of pluralization, privatization and technologization make up an amorphous assemblage of ideational, material, institutional, professional and ethical forces shape logics of temporality and organizing in police work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amoore, L. (2013). The politics of possibility. Risk and security beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
Amoore, L., & Piotukh, V. (2015). Life beyond big data governing with little analytics. Economy and Society, 44(3), 341–366.
Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness. Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798.
Andrejevic, M. (2014). Surveillance in the big data era. In K. D. Pimple (Ed.), Emerging pervasive information and communication technologies (PICT). Ethical challenges, opportunities and safeguards (pp. 55–69). Dordrecht: Springer.
Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2015). The (big) data-security assemblage. Knowledge and critique. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715609066.
Birchall, C. (2015). ‘Data. gov-in-a-box’. Delimiting transparency. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 185–202.
Bowling, B., Iyer, S., Reiner, R., & Sheptycki, J. (2016). Policing. Past, present and future. In R. Matthews (Ed.), What is to be done about crime and punishment? Towards a ‘public criminology’ (pp. 123–158). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Brayne, S. (2017). Big data surveillance. The case of policing. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865.
Dencik, L., Hintz, A., & Carey, Z. (2018). Prediction, pre-emption and limits to dissent: social media and big data uses for policing protests in the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817697722.
Flyverbom, M., & Madsen, A. K. (2015). Sorting data out. Unpacking big data value chains and algorithmic knowledge production. In F. Süssenguth (Ed.), Die Gesellschaft der Daten. Über die digitale Transformation der sozialen Ordnung (pp. 123–144). Bielefeld: transcript.
Flyverbom, M., Leonardi, P., Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2016). The management of visibilities in the digital age. Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 10, 98–109.
Flyverbom, M., Madsen, A. K., & Rasche, A. (2017). Big data as governmentality in international development. Digital traces, algorithms, and altered visibilities. The Information Society, 33(1), 35–42.
Folketinget. (2017). L 171 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om politiets virksomhed og toldloven. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20161/lovforslag/l171/20161_l171_som_fremsat.htm. Accessed 23 May 2019.
Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure. The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansen, H. K. (2015). Numerical operations, transparency illusions and the datafication of governance. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 203–220.
Hansen, H. K. (2018). Policing corruption post- and pre-crime. Collective action and private authority in the maritime industry. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25(1), 131–156.
Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872–889.
Hansen, H. K., & Porter, T. (2017). What do big data do in global governance? Global Governance, 23(1), 31–42.
Hansen, H. K., & Uldam, J. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, corporate surveillance and neutralizing corporate resistance. On the commodification of risk-based policing. In G. Barak (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of the crimes of the powerful (pp. 186–196). New York: Routledge.
Hartmann, M. R. K. (2018). Grey zone creativity. The case of proactive policing. In N. R. Fyfe, H. Gundhus, & K. V. Rønn (Eds.), Moral issues in intelligence-led policing (pp. 161–181). London: Routledge.
Joh, E. E. (2014). Policing by numbers. Big data and the fourth amendment. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 35–68.
Latour, B. (1988). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Madsen, A. K., Flyverbom, M., Hilbert, M., & Ruppert, E. (2016). Big Data: Issues for an international political sociology of data practices. International Political Sociology, 10(3), 275–296.
McCulloch, J., & Wilson, D. (2017). Pre-emption, precaution and the future. London: Routledge.
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here. New York: PublicAffairs.
O’Reilly, C. (2015). The pluralization of high policing. Convergence and divergence at the public-private interface. Bristish Journal of Crimonology, 55(4), 688–710.
Omidi, M. (2014). Anti-homeless spikes are just the latest in ‘defensive urban architecture’. The Guardian, 12 June 2014. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/jun/12/anti-homeless-spikes-latest-defensive-urban-architecture. Accessed 23 May 2019.
Perry, W. L., McInnis, B., Price, C. C., Smith, S. C., & Hollywood, J. S. (2013). Predictive policing. The role of crime forecasting in law enforcement operations. Santa Monica: RAND. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR200/RR233/RAND_RR233.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2019.
Rathmell, A. (2002). Towards postmodern intelligence. Intelligence and National Security, 17(3), 87–104.
Roach, K. (2010). The roding distinction between intelligence and evidence in terroism investigations. In N. McGarrity, A. Lynch, & G. Williams (Eds.), Counter-terrorism and beyond (pp. 48–66). London: Routledge.
Rouvroy, A. (2011). Technology, virtuality and utopia governmentality in an age of autonomic computing. In M. Hildebrandt & A. Rouvroy (Eds.), Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing (pp. 119–140). London: Routledge.
Sanders, C. B., & Sheptycki, J. (2017). Policing, crime and ‘big data’. Towards a critique of the moral economy of stochastic governance. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(1–2), 1–15.
Sheptycki, J. (1998). Policing, postmodernism and transnationalization. British Journal of Criminology, 38(3), 485–503.
Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flyverbom, M., Hansen, H.K. (2019). Policing and Anticipatory Transparency: On Digital Transformations, Proactive Governance and Logics of Temporality. In: August, V., Osrecki, F. (eds) Der Transparenz-Imperativ. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22294-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22294-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22293-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22294-9
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)