Skip to main content

Inequality and the Labor Market – Theories, opinions, models, and practices of unequal distribution and how they can be justified (2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Der Wohlfahrtsstaat und seine Bürger

Part of the book series: Ausgewählte Schriften von Claus Offe ((ASCO,volume 2))

  • 2777 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

The paper provides a multi-disciplinary overview of normative and empirical issues concerning labor markets and inequalities in contemporary capitalist democracies. It begins with a discussion of philosophical controversies in relation to issues of distributive justice. This is followed by a review of peoples’ attitudes and opinions, as revealed in surveys and experiments, concerning inequality and fairness. In regard to contributions from economics, the question is discussed whether the relationship between equality/equity and efficiency should be seen as a trade-off. Finally, the thesis is advanced that most of the inequalities (for example in relation to income, job quality, job and income security) are reflected in but not caused by labor markets; instead, the institutional framework in which the labor market is embedded (labor law, education, training, wage determination, social security etc.) is responsible for the (in)equality of outcomes, as are managerial strategies positioning jobs and their holders in firms and other organizations. In his brief conclusion, the author refrains from advocating a normative solution to the issue of distributive fairness; instead, he highlights two axes of controversy that structure the debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (NBER Working Paper No. 14825). Cambridge/MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. S. (1999). What is the point of equality ? Ethics, 109, 287 – 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge/ MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Naef, M., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. AER, 96(5), 1912 – 1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J., Conceicao, P., & Ferreira, P. (1999). Inequality and unemployment in Europe: The American cure. New Left Review, 237, 28 – 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, S. (2008). Equality of opportunity. Roemer’s synthesis. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://simon.d.halliday.googlepages.com/EqOp.pdf

  • Jäntti, M., Roed, K., Naylor, R., Björklund, A., Bratsberg, B., Raaum, O., … Eriksson, T. (2006). American exceptionalism in a new light: A comparison of intergenerational earnings mobility in the nordic countries, the United Kingdom and the United States (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1938). Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2006). Left liberalism revisited. In The Egalitarian Conscience. Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (pp. 9 – 35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation. (2009). A Bit Rich: Calculating the real value to society of different professions. Retrieved from http://neweconomics.org/2009/12/a-bitrich/

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1976). Industry and Inequality. The Achievement Principle in Work and Social Status. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierik, R., & Robeyns, I. (2007). Resources versus Capabilities: Social Endowments in Egalitarian Theory. Political Studies, 55(1), 133 – 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1980). Equality of What ? In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. 1. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claus Offe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Offe, C. (2019). Inequality and the Labor Market – Theories, opinions, models, and practices of unequal distribution and how they can be justified (2010). In: Der Wohlfahrtsstaat und seine Bürger. Ausgewählte Schriften von Claus Offe, vol 2. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22259-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22259-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22258-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22259-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics