Firm Founders and Novelty

Part of the Innovation und Entrepreneurship book series (INNOV)


Founders are critical to the performance of new ventures. However, recent research has started a debate on the continuing role of founders in maturing ventures. At some point, founders who stay in control of a company’s management may become a hindrance to value creation.


founder influence technological novelty research and development inventive experience teams 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R. B., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies, 18(4): 1403–1432.Google Scholar
  2. Aime, F., Humphrey, S., DeRue, D. S., & Paul, J. B. 2014. The riddle of heterarchy: Power transitions in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2): 327–352.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. 2001. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6): 755–775.Google Scholar
  4. Assmus, A., & Haeussler, C. 2016. Bridging the gap from inventions to innovations: Increasing success rates in clinical trials. Working Paper, 1–40.Google Scholar
  5. Åstebro, T., & Thompson, P. 2011. Entrepreneurs, jacks of all trades or hobos? Research Policy, 40(5): 637–649.Google Scholar
  6. Audia, P. G., & Goncalo, J. A. 2007. Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Science, 53(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  7. Basu, S., Sahaym, A., Howard, M. D., & Boeker, W. 2015. Parent inheritance, founder expertise, and venture strategy: Determinants of new venture knowledge impact. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2): 322–337.Google Scholar
  8. Beckman, C. M., & Burton, M. D. 2008. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science, 19(1): 3–24.Google Scholar
  9. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6): 633–644.Google Scholar
  10. Bunderson, J. S. 2003a. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4): 557–591.Google Scholar
  11. Bunderson, J. S. 2003b. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effets and the moderating role of power centralization. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4): 458–474.Google Scholar
  12. Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. 2011. Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5): 1182–1194.Google Scholar
  13. Buyl, T., Boone, C., Hendriks, W., & Matthyssens, P. 2011. Top management team functional diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 151–177.Google Scholar
  14. Casson, M. 1982. The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
  15. Chatterji, A. K. 2009. Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2): 185–206.Google Scholar
  16. Choi, H.-S., & Thompson, L. 2005. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 98(2): 121–132.Google Scholar
  17. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. 2005. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6): 795–816.Google Scholar
  18. Conti, R., Gambardella, A., & Mariani, M. 2014. Learning to be edison: Inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions. Organization Science, 25(3): 833–849.Google Scholar
  19. Dencker, J. C., & Gruber, M. 2015. The effects of opportunities and founder experience on new firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7): 1035–1052.Google Scholar
  20. Edmondson, A. C. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2): 128–146.Google Scholar
  21. Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., & O’Neill, H. M. 2012. The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 33(4): 427–447.Google Scholar
  22. Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3): 505–538.Google Scholar
  23. Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1): 117–132.Google Scholar
  24. Foss, N. J. 1993. Theories of the firm: Contractual and competence perspectives. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 3(2): 127–144.Google Scholar
  25. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. 2012. Organizing entrepreneurial judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. 2015. Introduction to a forum on the judgment-based approach to entrepreneurship. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(03): 585–599.Google Scholar
  27. Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. 2012. Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4): 998–1022.Google Scholar
  28. Grandori, A. 2016. Knowledge-intensive work and the (re)emergence of democratic governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2): 167–181.Google Scholar
  29. Grupp, H., Jungmittag, A., Schmoch, U., & Legler, H. 2000. Hochtechnologie 2000: Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands [High-tech industries 2000: New definition of high-tech industries for the reports on the technological performance of Germany], Report for the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research. Karlsruhe/Hannover, Germany.Google Scholar
  30. Haeussler, C., Hennicke, M., & Mueller, E. 2016. Founder inventors and their investors: Implications for firm survival and growth. Working Paper, 1–48.Google Scholar
  31. Hsu, D. H., & Lim, K. 2014. Knowledge brokering and organizational innovation: Founder imprinting effects. Organization Science, 25(4): 1134–1153.Google Scholar
  32. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, B. F. 2009. The burden of knowledge and the ‘death of the renaissance man’: Is innovation getting harder? Review of Economic Studies, 76(1): 283–317.Google Scholar
  34. Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. 1991. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1): 45–61.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, S., & Vakili, K. 2015. The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10): 1435–1457.Google Scholar
  36. Keijl, S., Gilsing, V. A., Knoben, J., & Duysters, G. 2016. The two faces of inventions: The relationship between recombination and impact in pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 45(5): 1061–1074.Google Scholar
  37. Kirzner, I. M. 1979. Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit (Reprints of Economic Classics). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  39. Kor, Y. Y. 2003. Experience-based top management team competence and sustained growth. Organization Science, 14(6): 707–719.Google Scholar
  40. Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. 2007. Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7): 1187–1212.Google Scholar
  41. Lazear, E. P. 2005. Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4): 649–680.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, J. M., Hwang, B.-H., & Chen, H. 2017. Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 751–769.Google Scholar
  43. Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4): 587–604.Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, K. 2004. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11): 1519–1533.Google Scholar
  45. Littlepage, G., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. 1997. Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2): 133–147.Google Scholar
  46. Liu, K., Li, J., Hesterly, W., & Cannella, A. 2012. Top management team tenure and technological inventions at post-IPO biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Research, 65(9): 1349–1356.Google Scholar
  47. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. 1979. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11): 2098–2109.Google Scholar
  48. March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
  49. March, J. G. 2010. The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 132–152.Google Scholar
  51. Melero, E., & Palomeras, N. 2015. The renaissance man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors. Research Policy, 44(1): 154–167.Google Scholar
  52. Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. 2003. Diversity and creativity in work groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity. Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nelson, T. 2003. The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8): 707–724.Google Scholar
  54. Nerlinger, E., & Berger, G. 1995. Technologieorientierte Industrien und Unternehmen: Alternative Definitionen [Technology-oriented industries and companies: Alternative definitions]. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 95–20, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  55. Nickerson, R. S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2): 175–220.Google Scholar
  56. Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22(5): 1286–1296.Google Scholar
  57. Palomeras, N., & Wehrheim, D. 2016. The strategic allocation of inventors to R&D collaborations. UC3M Working Paper Series, available at:
  58. Park, H. D., & Tzabbar, D. 2016. Venture capital, CEOs’ sources of power, and innovation novelty at different life stages of a new venture. Organization Science, 27(2): 336–353.Google Scholar
  59. Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Reagans, R., Argote, L., & Brooks, D. 2005. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51(6): 869–881.Google Scholar
  61. Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 243–263.Google Scholar
  62. Schmoch, U. 2008. Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), 1–15.Google Scholar
  63. Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448–469.Google Scholar
  64. Singh, J., & Fleming, L. 2010. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
  65. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6): 1467–1478.Google Scholar
  66. Stewart, W. H., & Roth, P. L. 2001. Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1): 145–153.Google Scholar
  67. Stock, J., & Yogo, M. 2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews, J. H. Stock, & T. J. Rothenberg (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models. Essays in honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Stucki, T. 2016. How the founders’ general and specific human capital drives export activities of start-ups. Research Policy, 45(5): 1014–1030.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, A., & Greve, H. R. 2006. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 723–740.Google Scholar
  70. Valliere, D. 2013. Towards a schematic theory of entrepreneurial alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(3): 430–442.Google Scholar
  71. Vella, F., & Verbeek, M. 1999. Estimating and interpreting models with endogenous treatment effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(4): 473–478.Google Scholar
  72. Wang, J., & Hicks, D. 2015. Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1): 197–207.Google Scholar
  73. Wasserman, N. 2017. The throne vs. the kingdom. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2): 255–277.Google Scholar
  74. Wegner, D. M. 1987. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior: 185–208. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  75. Wittenbaum, G. M. 1998. Information sampling in decision-making groups. Small Group Research, 29(1): 57–84.Google Scholar
  76. Wittenbaum, G. M. 2000. The bias toward discussing shared information. Communication Research, 27(3): 379–401.Google Scholar
  77. Wooldridge, J. M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827): 1036–1039.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FB WirtschaftswissenschaftenUniversität PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations