Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Daten- und Informationsqualität pp 209–219Cite as

Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 9080 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Entwicklungen zum Web 2.0 haben das World Wide Web (WWW) grundlegend verändert. Nachdem die meisten Nutzer im WWW zunächst „nur“ nach Informationen suchten stellen Nutzer inzwischen sehr ausgiebig Informationen über sich selbst oder ihnen vertraute Themen in Blogs und Communities bereit. Facebook und Wikipedia sind zwei prominente Webseiten. Ihre Attraktivität entstammt allein den Informationen, welche die Nutzer selber zur Verfügung stellen.

Die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit entstand im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01MQ07014 geförderten Forschungsprogramms THESEUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bereits Ende 2006 verfügte Wikipedia auf den englischsprachigen Seiten über eine Community von 46.000 Nutzern, die im laufenden Monat mindestens fünf Beiträge editierten hatten (Wikimedia Foundation 2006).

  2. 2.

    Wie beziehen uns hier und im Folgenden auf die im Kap. A.2 vorgestellten Dimensionen der Informationsqualität.

Literatur

  • Agichtein, E./Brille, E./Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 6–11, 2006, Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antiqueira, L./Graças, M./Nunesm, V./Oliveira, O. N./Da F. Costa, L.: Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features. In: Physica, A, 373, 2007, S. 811–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenstock, J. E.: Automatically Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. School of Information, Paper 2008-021, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q./Duan, W./Gan, Q.: Exploring determinants of voting for the „helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. In: Decision Support Systems, 50 (2), 2011, S. 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claypool, M./Le, P./Wased, M./Brown, D.: Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, January 14–17, 2001, IUI ’01, ACM, New York, NY, 2001, S. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. D.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (10), 2001, S. 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBay, W. H.: The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa, Calif., 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufty, D./McNamara, D./Louwerse, M./Cai, Z./Graesser, A.: Automatic Evaluation of Aspects of Document Quality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: The engineering of quality documentation, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnefeld, I./Iseke, A./Krebs, A.: Explicit Incentives in Online Communities: Boon or Bane? In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (1), 2012, S. 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, A./Ipeirotis, P.: Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23 (10), 2010, S. 1498–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, J.: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. In: Nature, 43, 2005, S. 900–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, S./Huberman, B.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. In: Journal of Information Science 32 (2), 2006, S. 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graefe, G./Maaß, C./Heß, A.: Alternative Searching Services: Seven Theses on the Importance of “Social Bookmarking”. In: The Social Semantic Web 2007: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Social Semantic Web (CSSW), GI Edition, Lecture Notes in Informatics, 2007, S. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C./McNamara, D. S./Louwerse, M. M./Cai, Z.: Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. In: Behavior Research Methods 36 (2), 2004, S. 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammwöhner, R./Fuchs, K.-P./Kattenbeck, M./Sax, C.: Qualität der Wikipedia – Eine vergleichende Studie. Internationales Symposium Informationswissenschaft, ISI 2007, Köln, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, N./Bose, I./Koh, N. S./Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. In: Decision Support Systems, 52 (3), 2012, S. 674–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joachims, T./Granka, L./Pan, B./Hembrooke, H./Radlinkski, F./Gay, G.: Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 25 (2), 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. D.: Understanding Implicit Feedback and Document Preference: a Naturalistic User Study. Doctoral Thesis, UMI Order Number: AAI3117613, Rutgers University, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J./Oard, D. W./Romanik, K.: Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching. University of Maryland, CLIS, Technical Report 00–01, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M./Richter, A.: Enterprise 2.0– Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenburg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, Germany, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, J./Miller, B./Maltz, D./Herlocker, J./Gordon, L./Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM 40 (3), 1997, S. 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korfiatis, N./Garcia-Bariocanal, E./Sánchez-Alonso, S.: Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. In: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (3), 2012, S. 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, S./Bollacker, K./Giles, C. L.: Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, Missouri, United States, November 02–06, 1999), S. Gauch, Ed. CIKM ’99, ACM, New York, NY, 1999, S. 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M./Huang, L./Tan, C.-H./Wie, K.-K.: Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (4), 2013, S. 101–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lih, A: Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, April 16–17, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, S./de Ruyter, K./Friedman, M./Brüggen, E. C./Wetzels, M./Pfann, G.: More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates, In: Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 2013, S. 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, K. B./Kantor, P./Strzalkowski, T./Wacholder, N./Tang, R./Bai, B./Rittman, R./Song, P./Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities: Research Articles. In: American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57 (9), 2006, S. 1155–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, D.: Implicit ratings and filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Budapest, Hungary 10–12, ERCIM, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F.: Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: Heckhausen, J./Heckhausen, H. (Hrsg.): Motivation und Handeln, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg, 2006, S. 331–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, J./Polanco, M. J.: Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web. In: Communications of the ACM, 40 (3), 1997, S. 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, Y./Zhang, B.: Learning user’s preferences by analyzing Web-browsing behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Barcelona, Spain, June 03–07, 2000), AGENTS ’00, ACM, New York, NY, 2000; S. 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stvilia B./Twidale, M. B./Smith, L.C./Gasser, L.: Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality – ICIQ 2005, S. 442–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R./Ng, K. B./Strzalkowski, T./Kantor, P. B.: Automatically Predicting Information Quality in News Documents. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology – North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W.: Implicit Feedback for Interactive Information Retrieval. Doctoral Thesis, Glasgow University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediansEditsGt5.htm.

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 29. August 2014, 12:51h) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 25. January 2014, 16:41h).

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Splitting (letzte Änderung vom 26. August 2014, 16:35h).

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_for_nominating_good_articles (letzte Änderung vom 3. August 2014, 00:34h).

  • Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism (letzte Änderung vom 5. September 2014, 19:55h).

  • Willemsen, L. M./Neijens, P. C./Bronner, F./de Ridder, J. A.: “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (1), 2011, S. 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanbe, Y./Jatowt, A./Nakamura, S./Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries, June 18–23, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007, S. 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Atos IT Solutions and Services GmbH, C-LAB, Paderborn, Deutschland

    Sven Ahlheid, Alexander Krebs & Dirk Schuster

  2. Siemens AG, Energy Management, Nürnberg, Deutschland

    Gernot Gräfe

Authors
  1. Sven Ahlheid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gernot Gräfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Krebs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dirk Schuster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Ahlheid .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Freising, Germany

    Knut Hildebrand

  2. Hannover Rück AG, Hannover, Germany

    Marcus Gebauer

  3. Fachhochschule Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

    Holger Hinrichs

  4. Deutsche Bahn AG, Frankfurt, Germany

    Michael Mielke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ahlheid, S., Gräfe, G., Krebs, A., Schuster, D. (2018). Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0. In: Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., Mielke, M. (eds) Daten- und Informationsqualität. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21994-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation