Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Das Recht der Anderen

Rechtsethnologie zwischen Pluralität, Indigenität und Alterität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung

Zusammenfassung

Die Rechtswissenschaft und die Ethnologie haben denselben Forschungsgegenstand – die Ordnung des menschlichen Zusammenlebens. Sie nähern sich ihm nur aus unterschiedlichen Richtungen: In der Rechtswissenschaft wird der Mensch seit dem 19. Jahrhundert mit seiner Geburt als Rechtssubjekt und Träger von Rechten und Pflichten betrachtet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adam, L. (1937). Ethnologische Rechtsforschung. In K. T. Preuss (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch für Völkerkunde (S. 280–306). Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachofen, J. J. (1861). Mutterrecht. Stuttgart: Krais und Hoffmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda-Beckmann, F. v., & Benda-Beckmann, K. v. (2007). Gesellschaftliche Wirkung von Recht. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda-Beckmann, F. v., Benda-Beckmann, K. v., & Griffiths, A. (Hrsg.). (2009). The Power of Law in a Transnational World. Anthropological Inquiries. Oxford & New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J. (2016). The Force of Custom. Law and the Ordering of Everyday Life in Kyrgyzstan. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, J., & Girke, F. (2015). Practicing Harmony Ideology. Ethnographic Reflections on Community and Coercion. Common Knowledge. In J. Perl (Hrsg.). Sonderband: Peace by Other Means. Symposium on the Role of Ethnography and the Humanities in the Understanding, Prevention, and Resolution of Enmity. Part 3. 21, 2, S. 196–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, K. (2016). Indigeneity. Before and beyond the law. Milton Park & New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What’s Wrong with Social Ttheory? American Sociological Review, 19, 1, S. 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P. (1957). Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv. London & New York: Oxford University Press.Bohannan, P., & Van der Elst, D. (1998). Asking and Listening. Ethnography as Personal Adaptation. Prospect Heights: Waveland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and Function in Primitive Society. London: Cohen & West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon, G.-C. L. (1750–1774). Allgemeine Naturgeschichte. Troppau: Traßler & Kompanie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrithers, M., Matei, C., Sykes, K., Holbraad, M., & Venkatesan, S. (2010). Ontology is just Another Word for Culture. Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester. Critique of Anthropology, 30, 2, S. 152–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, H., & Larking, E. (Hrsg.). (2015). Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review. Rituals and Ritualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (2013). Returns. Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, John, & Comaroff, Jean. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lauri, A. (Hrsg.). (2015). The Politics of Human Rights. Security, Aid and the Hidden Agendas of Humanitarianism. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (2008). Legal Anthropology. An Introduction. Lanham & Plymouth: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson, T. (2001). The Myth of the Noble Savage. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, G., Feuchtwang, S., & Neubert, D. (Hrsg.). (1999). Dynamics of Violence. Processes of Escalation and De-escalation in Violent Group Conflicts. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, A. L. (1973). The Reasonable Man Revisited. Some Problems in the Anthropology of Law. Law and Society Review, 7, 4, S. 643–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2013). Enforcing Order. An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2017). Writing the World of Policing. The Difference Ethnography Makes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriott, W. (Hrsg.). (2013). Policing and Contemporary Governance. The Anthropology of Police in Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, M. (1955). The Judicial Process Among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2015). Radical Alterity is just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’. A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU, 5, 2. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, N. (2000). Chasing an Identity. An Aboriginal Perspective on Aboriginality. In K. Reed-Gilbert (Hrsg.), The Strength of Us as Women: Black Women Speak. (S. 47–53). Chamwood: Ginninderra Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. (2013). Borders and the Relocation of Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, S. 345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grünberger, M. (2016). Transnationales Recht als responsiver Rechtspluralismus? Der Staat, 55:1, S. 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulliver, P. H. (1963). Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masia of Northern Tanganyika. Boston: Boston University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2012). Red Tape. Bureaucracy, Structural Violence, and Poverty in India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme-Tuomisaari, M. (2010). Human Rights in Action. Learning Expert Knowledge. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heraklit, Fragmente, B 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, G. (2011). Guerilla Auditors. The Politics of Transparency in Neoliberal Paraguay. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1738). Traktat über die menschliche Natur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T., & Palsson, G. (Hrsg.). (2013). Biosocial Becomings. Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, K.-H. (2012). Ureinwohner. Zur Geschichte und Kritik einer aktuellen politischen Kategorie. In M. Ott & T. Döring (Hrsg.), Urworte. Zur Geschichte und Funktion erstbegründender Begriffe (S. 77–91). Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, J. (1897). Das Recht der Australneger. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 7, S. 321–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, A. (2003). The Return of the Native. Current Anthropology, 44, 3, S. 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafitau, J. (1724). Sauvages Américains comparées aux moeurs des premiers temps. Paris: Saugrain l’aîné.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Eine neue Soziologie für eine neue Gesellschaft. Einführung in die Akteur-Netzwerk-Theorie. Aus dem Englischen von G. Roßler. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lescarbot, M. (1609). Histoire de la nouvelle France. Paris. Archive Org https://archive.org/details/histoiredelanouv00lesc_2. Zugegriffen: 19. Juni 2017.

  • Llewellyn, K., & Adamson Hoebel, E. (1941). The Cheyenne Way. Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, H. S. (1861). Ancient Law. London: John Murray.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1942). A New Instrument for the Interpretation of Law – Especially Primitive. The Yale Law Journal, 51, 8, S. 1237–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1990 [1923/24]). Die Gabe. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (1993). Legal Pluralism and Transnational Culture. The Ka Ho’Okolokolonui Kanaka Maoli Tribunal, Hawai’i. In R. A. Wilson (Hrsg.), Human Rights, Culture and Context. Anthropological Perspectives (S. 28–48). Chicago: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, R. (2009). Global Legal Pluralism. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 5, S. 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C. S. (1748). L’esprit de loi. Genf: Barrillot & Fils.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. F. (2005). Certainties Undone. Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999. In S. F. Moore (Hrsg.), Law and Anthropology. A Reader (S. 346–367). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, L. H. (1877). Ancient Society. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, G. F. (2010). Ethnographische Schriften I. Bearbeitet von W. Hintzsche & A. C. Elert. Bd. VIII. Halle: Verlag der Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, L. (1965). The Anthropological Study of Law. American Anthropologist, 67, 6, S. 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, R. (2003). Culture and the Judiciary. The Meaning of the Culture Concept as a Source of Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Canadian Journal of Law and Society / La Revue Canadienne Droit et Societé, 18, 2, S. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niezen, R., & Sapignoli, M. (Hrsg.). (2016). Palaces of Hope. The Anthropology of Global Organizations. New York et al.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, F., & Scheele, J. (Hrsg.). (2014). Legalism. Community and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pospisil, L. (1958). The Kapauku Papuans of West New Guinea. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, A. (1890). Grundriss der ethnologischen Jurisprudenz. Oldenburg & Leipzig: Schulzesche Hof-Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, E. (2002). The Cunning of Recognition. Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. (2012). Structure and function in primitive society essays and addresses. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randeria, S. (2008). Legal Pluralism, Social Movements and the Post-colonial State in India. Fractured Sovereignty and Differential Citizenship Rights. In B. de Sousa Santos (Hrsg.), Another Knowledge Is possible. Beyond Northern Epistemologies, 3 (S. 41–74). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, M. (2014). Border Work. Spatial Lives of the Sstate in Rural Central Asia. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (1998). Against Legal Pluralism. Some Reflections on the Contemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. 30, 42, S. 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouland, N. (1994). Legal Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. (1755). Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago, Ill.: Aldine/Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapera, I. (1938). A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, R. (1982). Main Trends in German Ethnological Jurisprudence and Legal Ethnology. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 20, S. 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seinecke, R. (2015). Das Recht des Rechtspluralismus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). The Anthropology of the State. A Reader. Malden & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C. (2009). Everything You Know About Indians is Wrong. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. J. (2014). The War on Humans. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the Teaching Machine. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, J., & Collier, J. (1998). History and Power in the Study of Law. New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamanaha, B. (1993). The Folly of the ‚Social Scientific’ Concept of Legal Pluralism. Journal of Law and Society, 20, 2, S. 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (1996). Global Bukowina. Zur Emergenz eines transnationalen Rechtspluralismus. Rechtshistorisches Journal, 15, S. 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. (2012). Unruly Edges. Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1,1, S. 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinen, J. (1971). Le pluralisme juridique. Essai de synthèse. In J. Gilissen (Hrsg.), Le pluralisme juridique (S. 19–56). Brüssel: Université Libre de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, H. (2015). Before Boas. The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment. Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesel, U. (2001). Geschichte des Rechts. Von den Frühformen bis zur Gegenwart. 2. Aufl., München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zippelius, R. (1994). Rechtsphilosophie. Ein Studienbuch. 3. Aufl., München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Konstanz, Deutschland

    Judith Beyer

Authors
  1. Judith Beyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Beyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Juristische Fakultät, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Christian Boulanger

  2. Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Julika Rosenstock

  3. Juristische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Tobias Singelnstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beyer, J. (2019). Das Recht der Anderen. In: Boulanger, C., Rosenstock, J., Singelnstein, T. (eds) Interdisziplinäre Rechtsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21990-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21990-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21989-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21990-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation