Skip to main content

Über die Möglichkeit einer Gesellschaft nach dem Geld aus Sicht der evolutionären politischen Ökonomie, ihre Subjekte und die Rolle globaler Informationstechnologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Postmonetär denken

Zusammenfassung

Schon seit der ersten vormodernen städtischen Zivilisation der Sumerer in Mesopotamien spielen Gelder eine zentrale Rolle im gesellschaftlichen Leben der Menschen. Nichtsdestotrotz konnte sich Geld erst innerhalb der kapitalistischen Produktionsverhältnisse zum zentralen organisatorischen Prinzip der politischen Ökonomie entwickeln. Eine Bedingung für die Metamorphose verschiedener Geldformen ist dabei die Kommodifizierung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allon, Fiona (2015). Money, Debt, and the Business of ‚Free Stuff‘. South Atlantic Quarterly 114, 283 – 305. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2862718.

  • Arrighi, Giovanni (2010 [1994]). The long twentieth century. Money, power and the origins of our times. London/New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beikverdi, Alireza, & Song, JooSeok (2015). Trend of Centralization in Bitcoin’s Distributed Network. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD). 16th IEEE/ACIS International Conference, 1 – 6. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Robert (1988). Technical Change and the Theory of ‚Régulation‘. In Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg & Luc Soete (Hrsg.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (S. 67 – 94). London: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Robert (2000). Is a Finance-Led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis. Economy and Society 29, 111 – 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Benjamin (2015). The Stack. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Robert, & Glick, Mark (1991). The Regulation Approach: Theory and History. New Left Review 188, 45 – 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Stéphane (1999). Death and the Ideology of Compensation among the Wodani, Western Highlands of Irian Jaya. Social Anthropology 7, 297 – 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Stéphane (2000). Social Body and Icon of the Person: A Symbolic Analysis of Shell Money among the Wodani, Western Highlands of Irian Jaya. American Ethnologist 26, 558 – 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, Karl-Heinz (2012). Die Herrschaft des Geldes. Geschichte und Systematik. 2., durchges. Aufl. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, Erik, & McAfee, Andrew (2014). The Second Machine Age. Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelier, Jean (2006). The Hypostasis of Money: An Economic Point of View. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, 217 – 233. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bel022.

  • Castells, Manuel (2000). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume 1. Malden (USA)/Oxford (UK)/West Sussex (UK): Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles (1993). Postskriptum über die Kontrollgesellschaften. In Gilles Deleuze, Unterhandlungen 1972 – 1990 (S. 254 – 262). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversberg, Dennis (2014). Dividuell aktiviert. Wie Arbeitsmarktpolitik Subjektivitäten produziert. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (2008). Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumagalli, Andrea, & Lucarelli, Stefano (2015). Finance, Austerity and Commonfare. Theory, Culture & Society 32, 51 – 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, David (2010). On the Moral Grounds of Economic Relations. Open Anthropology Cooperative Press Working Papers Series, No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, David (2012). Schulden. Die ersten 5 000 Jahre. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanappi, Hardy (2013). Money, Credit, Capital, and the State: On the Evolution of Money and Institutions. In Guido Buenstorf, Uwe Cantner, Horst Hanusch, Michael Hutter, Hans-Walter Lorenz & Fritz Rahmeyer (Hrsg.), The Two Sides of Innovation: Creation and Destruction in the Evolution of Capitalist Economies (S. 255 – 282). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanappi, Hardy (2016). Capital after Capitalism: The Evolution of the Concept of Capital in the Light of Long-Run Sustainable Production of the Species. MPRA Paper No. 77161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanappi, Hardy, & Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel (2017). Evolutionary Political Economy: Content and Methods. Forum for Social Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2017.1287748.

  • Hilferding, Rudolf (1981). Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, Giorgos, Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, & Zografos, Christos (2013). To Value or Not to Value ? That Is Not the Question. Ecological Economics 94, 97 – 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapeller, Jakob, & Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel (2016). Evolutionary Political Economy and the Complexity of Economic Policy: Power, Knowledge and Learning. In Claudius Gräbner, Torsten Heinrich & Henning Schwardt (Hrsg.). Policy Implications of Recent Advances in Evolutionary and Institutional Economics (S. 43 – 61). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kregel, Jan (2008). Minsky’s Cushions of Safety. Systemic Risk and the Crisis in the U. S. Subprime Mortgage Market. Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Series, No. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio (2011). The Making of the Indebted Man. Los Angeles, CA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio (2013). Governing by Debt. South Pasadena, CA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likavčan, Lukáš, & Scholz-Wäckerle, Manuel (2017). Technology Appropriation in a De-Growing Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.134.

  • Lipietz, Alain (1992). Towards a New Economic Order: Postfordism, Ecology and Democracy. London/Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (1974). Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. 2. Aufl. Berlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (2001 [1867]). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. 20. Aufl. MEW 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Paul (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Robin, & Avenassian, Armen (Hrsg.) (2014). #Accelerate#. The Accelerationist Reader. Falmouth: Urbanomic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, Hyman P. (2008). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morini, Cristina, & Fumagalli, Andrea (2010). Life Put to Work: Towards a Life Theory of Value. Ephemera 10, 234 – 252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulier-Boutang, Yann (2012). Cognitive Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, Ugo (2011). Interlocking Complementarities and Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics 7, 373 – 392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, Melanie (2015). Legal Dispossession: State Strategies and Selectivities in the Expansion of Indonesian Palm Oil and Agrofuel Production. Development and Change 46, 508 – 533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl (2014): The Great Transformation. Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiag, Hadrien (2014). Towards a Neo-Polanyian Approach to Money: Integrating the Concept of Debt. Economy and Society 43, 559 – 581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2014.898825

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (2012). The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money. 3rd edition. Ed. by David Frisby (trans. by Tom Bottomore & David Frisby). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, Nick, & Williams, Alex (2014). #Accelerate: Manifesto for an Accelerationist Politics, In Robin McKay & Armen Avenassian (Hrsg.), #Accelerate#. The Accelerationist Reader (S. 347 – 362). Falmouth: Urbanomic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srnicek, Nick, & Williams, Alex (2015). Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work. London/New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockhammer, Engelbert (2009). The Finance-Dominated Accumulation Regime, Income Distribution and the Present Crisis. Papeles de Europa 19, 58 – 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, Tiziana (2014). Red Stack Attack ! Algorithms, Capital and the Automation of the Common. In Robin McKay & Armen Avenassian (Hrsg.), #Accelerate#. The Accelerationist Reader (S. 379 – 400) Falmouth: Urbanomic.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Griethuysen, Pascal (2010). Why Are We Growth-Addicted ? The Hard Way Towards Degrowth in the Involutionary Western Development Path. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 590 – 595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Yannis (2016). Imagining a New Bretton Woods. Comment on Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/imagining-new-bretton-woods-by-yanis-varoufakis-2016-05?barrier=true (zugegriffen im Dezember 2016).

  • Vercellone, Carlo (2007). From Formal Subsumption to General Intellect: Elements for a Marxist Reading of the Thesis of Cognitive Capitalism. Historical Materialism 15, 13 – 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wäckerle, Manuel (2013). On the Bottom-up Foundations of the Banking-Macro Nexus. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economicsejournal.ja.2013-40.

  • Wäckerle, Manuel (2014). The Foundations of Evolutionary Institutional Economics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Beat (2017). Competing for Legitimacy: A Typology of Virtual Currencies. http://blockchain.cs.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/paper_11.pdf (zugegriffen am 9. Februar 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernest Aigner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aigner, E., Scholz-Wäckerle, M. (2019). Über die Möglichkeit einer Gesellschaft nach dem Geld aus Sicht der evolutionären politischen Ökonomie, ihre Subjekte und die Rolle globaler Informationstechnologie. In: Die Gesellschaft nach dem Geld, P. (eds) Postmonetär denken. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21706-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21706-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21705-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21706-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics