Advertisement

The effects of perceived convenience and psychological reactance on resistance at different levels of signalized autonomous e-service provisioning

  • Christian Arnold
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

The increasing penetration of society by information technologies was already noted four decades ago by Nora and Minc (1978) and was identified with the concept of computerization. An end to this development is not in sight; instead we presently appear to be in a transitional phase, which can be characterized by a lasting change in the human-computer relationship. Mattern (2003, 2007), for example, predicts the comprehensive implementation of smart, adaptive, self-interlinking, and interactive information technologies capable of taking over unobtrusive tasks and providing service ubiquitously.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aarts, E.H./Encarnação, J.L. (2006): Into Ambient Intelligence. In: Aarts/Encarnação: True Visions − The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence. Springer: 1-16.Google Scholar
  2. Akaka, M.A./Vargo, S.L. (2013): Technology as an operant resource in service (eco) systems. In: Information Systems and e-Business Management 12(3): 367-384.Google Scholar
  3. Anagnostopoulos, C. B./Ntarladimas, Y./Hadjiefthymiades, S. (2007): Situational computing: An innovative architecture with imprecise reasoning. In: Journal of Systems and Software 80(12): 1993-2014.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, C. (2015): Ubiquitärer E-Service für Konsumenten: Die Perspektive der Theorie Psychologischer Reaktanz. Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold, C./Reckenfelderbäumer, M. (2017): Context-Aware Computing – Zur Integrativitätsproblematik aus Sicht der Leistungslehre. In: Bruhn/Hadwich: Dienstleistungen 4.0: Konzepte – Methoden – Instrumente. Band 1. Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement. Springer Gabler: 205-229.Google Scholar
  6. Aronson, E./Wilson, T.D./Akert, R.M./Sommers, S.R. (2012): Social Psychology. 8th Edition. Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Atzori, L./Iera, A./Morabito, G. (2010): The Internet of Things: A survey. In: Computer Networks 54(15): 2787-2805.Google Scholar
  8. Bagozzi, R.P./Yi, Y. (1988): On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1): 74-94.Google Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R.P./Baumgartner, H. (1994): The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models and Hypothesis Testing. In: Bagozzi: Principles of Marketing Research. Blackwell Publishers: 386-422.Google Scholar
  10. Barkhuus, L./Dey, A. (2003): Is Context-Aware Computing Taking Control Away from the User? Three Levels of Interactivity Examined. In: Dey/Schmidt/McCarthy: UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing: 5th International Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, October 12-15, 2003, Proceedings. Springer: 149-156.Google Scholar
  11. Baumgartner, H./Homburg, C. (1996): Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing 13(2): 139-161.Google Scholar
  12. Benkenstein, M. (2016): Leistungslehre und Dienstleistungsmanagement. In: Corsten/ Roth: Handbuch Dienstleistungsmanagement. Vahlen: 9-24.Google Scholar
  13. Berry, L.L./Seiders, K./Grewal, G. (2002): Understanding Service Convenience. In: Journal of Marketing 66(3): 1-17.Google Scholar
  14. Brehm, J.W. (1966): A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Brehm, J.W. (1993): Control, Its Loss, and Psychological Reactance. In: Weary/ Gleicher/Marsh: Control Motivation and Social Cognition. Springer: 3-30.Google Scholar
  16. Brehm, J.W./Stires, L.K./Sensenig, J./Shaban, J. (1966): The Attractiveness of an Eliminated Choice Alternative. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2(3): 301-313.Google Scholar
  17. Brehm, S.S./Brehm, J.W. (1981): Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Briñol, P./Rucker, D.D./Tormala, Z.L./Petty, R.E. (2004): Individual Differences in Resistance to Persuasion: The Role of Beliefs and Meta-Beliefs. In: Knowles/ Linn: Resistance and Persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum: 83-104.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, T.A. (2006): Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bühner, M. (2011): Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 3. Auflage. Pearson.Google Scholar
  21. Byrne, B.M. (2006): Structural Equation Modeling with EQS. 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Cassar, K./Warshaw, L. (2016): IoT commerce: an early read on Amazon’s Dash buttons. http://intelligence.slice.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Slice-White-Paper-Dash-Buttons-April-2016.pdf [2017-08-19].
  23. Cheung, G.W./Rensvold, R.B. (2002): Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. In: Structural Equation Modeling 9(2): 233-255.Google Scholar
  24. Chin, W.W. (1998): The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides: Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum: 295-336.Google Scholar
  25. Chong, A. (2013): Understanding Mobile Commerce Continuance Intentions: An Empirical Analysis of Chinese Consumers. In: Journal of Computer Information Systems 53(4):22-30.Google Scholar
  26. Claudy, M.C./Garcia, R./O’Driscoll, A. (2015): Consumer resistance to innovation – behavioral reasoning perspective. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(4): 528-544.Google Scholar
  27. Cohen, J. (1988): Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Curran, J.M./Meuter, M.L. (2005): Self‐service technology adoption: comparing three technologies. In: Journal of Services Marketing 19(2): 103-113.Google Scholar
  29. Engelhardt, W.H./Kleinaltenkamp, M./Reckenfelderbäumer, M. (1993): Leistungsbündel als Absatzobjekte: Ein Ansatz zur Überwindung der Dichotomie von Sach- und Dienstleistungen. In: ZfbF 45(5): 394-426.Google Scholar
  30. Fellesson, M./Friman, M. (2008): Perceived Satisfaction with Public Transport Service in Nine European Cities. In: Journal of the Transportation Research Forum 47(3): 93‐103.Google Scholar
  31. Ferscha, A. (2007): Pervasive Computing: connect > aware > smart. In: Mattern: Die Informatisierung des Alltags - Leben in smarten Umgebungen. Springer: 1-10.Google Scholar
  32. Fitzsimons, G. J./Lehmann, D.R. (2004): Reactance to Recommendations: When Unsolicited Advice Yields Contrary Responses. In: Marketing Science 23(1): 82-94.Google Scholar
  33. Fornell, C./Larcker, D. F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobserved Variables and Measurement Error. In: Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39-50.Google Scholar
  34. Freiling, J./Gersch, M./Goeke, C. (2006): Eine „Competence-based Theory of the Firm“ als marktprozesstheoretischer Ansatz. In: Schreyögg: Management von Kompetenz. Gabler: 37-82.Google Scholar
  35. Fuegen, K./Brehm J.W. (2004): The Intensity of Affect and Resistance to Social Influence. In: Knowles/Linn: Resistance and Persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum: 39-63.Google Scholar
  36. Garcia, R./Bardhi, F./Friedrich, C. (2007): Overcoming Consumer Resistance to Innovation. In: MIT Sloan Management Review 48(4): 82-88.Google Scholar
  37. Grabitz-Gniech, G./Grabitz, H.-J. (1973a): Der Einfluß von Freiheitseinengung und Freiheitswiederherstellung auf den Reaktanz-Effekt. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 4(4): 361-365.Google Scholar
  38. Grabitz-Gniech, G./Grabitz, H.-J. (1973b): Psychologische Reaktanz: Theoretisches Konzept und experimentelle Untersuchungen. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 4(1): 19-35.Google Scholar
  39. Hair, J.F./Black, W.C./Babin, B.J./Anderson, R.E. (2009): Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. 7th edition. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Hamari, J./Koivisto, J. (2014): Measuring flow in gamification: Dispositional Flow Scale-2. In: Computers in Human Behavior 40(2014): 133–143.Google Scholar
  41. Hancock, G.R. (2001): Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and mimic approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. In: Psychometrika 66(3): 373-388.Google Scholar
  42. Heidenreich, S./Spieth, P. (2013): Why innovations fail – The case of passive and active innovation resistance. In: International Journal of Innovation Management 17(5): 1-42.Google Scholar
  43. Homburg, C. (2015): Marketingmanagement. Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  44. Homburg, C./Baumgartner, H. (1995): Beurteilung von Kausalmodellen: Bestandsaufnahme und Anwendungsempfehlungen. In: Marketing ZFP 17(3): 162-176.Google Scholar
  45. Hoogland, J.J./Boomsma, A. (1998): Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling: An Overview and a Meta-Analysis. In: Sociological Methods & Research 26(3): 329-367.Google Scholar
  46. Jöreskog, K. G./Sörbom, D. (1996): LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  47. Jöreskog, K.G./Sörbom, D. (1982): Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling. In: Journal of Marketing Research 19(4): 404-416.Google Scholar
  48. Kleinaltenkamp, M. (1997): Integrativität als Kern einer umfassenden Leistungslehre. In: Backhaus/Günter/Kleinaltenkamp/Plinke/Raffée: Marktleistung und Wettbewerb: Strategische und operative Perspektiven der marktorientierten Leistungsgestaltung. Gabler: 83-114.Google Scholar
  49. Kline, R.B. (2015): Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th Edition. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Knowles, E.S./Linn J.A. (2004): The Importance of Resistance to Persuasion. In: Knowles/Linn: Resistance and Persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum: 3-9.Google Scholar
  51. Költzsch, T. (2015): Nach Übernahme von E-Plus: Telefónica stellt Gettings ein. https://golem.de/news/nach-uebernahme-von-e-plus-telef-nica-stellt-gettingsein-1512-118217.html [2017-08-14].
  52. Kortuem, G./Kawasar, F./Fitton, D./Sundramoorthy, V. (2010): Smart Objects as Building Blocks for the Internet of Things. In: Internet Computing, IEEE 14(1): 44-51.Google Scholar
  53. Lai, J.Y./Wibowo, S. (2012): How Service Convenience Influences Information Systems Success. In: International Journal of Future Computer and Communication 1(3): 217-220.Google Scholar
  54. Laukkanen, T./Sinkkonen, S./Kivijärvi, M./Laukkanen, P. (2007): Innovation resistance among mature consumers. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing 24(7): 419-427.Google Scholar
  55. Lee, G./Lee, W. J. (2009): Psychological reactance to online recommendation services. In: Information & Management 46(8): 448-452.Google Scholar
  56. Lewin, K. (1951): Field Theory in Social Science. Harper.Google Scholar
  57. Lloyd, A.E./Chan R./Yip, L./Chan, A. (2014): Time buying and time saving: Effects on service convenience and the shopping experience at the mall. In: Journal of Services Marketing 28(1): 36-49.Google Scholar
  58. Losch, N./Schulz, S. (2010): Akzeptanz und Reaktanz von mobilen Diensten: Eine empirische Studie am Beispiel von Deutschland und den USA. In: Marketing ZFP 32(4): 235-258.Google Scholar
  59. Lovelock, C./Gummesson, E. (2004): Whiter Services Marketing? In Search of a New Paradigm and Fresh Perspectives. In: Journal of Service Research 7(1): 20- 41.Google Scholar
  60. Mattern, F. (2003): Vom Verschwinden des Computers – Die Vision des Ubiquitous Computing. In: Mattern: Total vernetzt: Szenarien einer informatisierten Welt. Springer: 1-41.Google Scholar
  61. Mattern, F. (2007): Acht Thesen zur Informatisierung des Alltags. In: Mattern: Die Informatisierung des Alltags – Leben in smarten Umgebungen. Springer: 11-16.Google Scholar
  62. Miller, C.H./Lane, L.T./Deatrick, L.M./Young, A.M./Potts, K.A. (2007): Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom. In: Human Communication Research 33(2): 219-240.Google Scholar
  63. Müller, J./Alt, F./Michelis, D. (2011): Pervasive Advertising. In: Müller/Alt/Michelis: Pervasive Advertising. Springer: 1-29.Google Scholar
  64. Muthén, B.O./Kaplan, D. (1985): A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables. In: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 38(2): 171-189.Google Scholar
  65. Nora, S./Minc, A. (1978): L’informatisation de la société. Documentation française.Google Scholar
  66. Oreg, S. (2003): Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measure. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 680-693.Google Scholar
  67. Pavlus, J. (2013): Smart Watches. In: MIT Technology Review 116(3): 60-61.Google Scholar
  68. Podsakoff, P.M./Mackenzie, S.B./Lee, J.-Y./Podsakoff, N.P. (2003): Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. In: Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903.Google Scholar
  69. Podsakoff, P.M./MacKenzie, S.B./Podsakoff, N.P. (2012): Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. In: Annual Review of Psychology 63: 539-569.Google Scholar
  70. Quitadamo, R./Zambonelli, F./Cabri, G. (2007): The Service Ecosystem: Dynamic Self-Aggregation of Pervasive Communication Services. In: Software Engineering for Pervasive Computing Applications, Systems, and Environments, 2007. SEPCASE ‘07. First International Workshop on, Minneapolis, MN. IEEE: 1.Google Scholar
  71. Raab, G./Unger, A./Unger, F. (2016): Marktpsychologie. 4. Auflage. Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  72. Reckenfelderbäumer, M./Arnold, C. (2015): Value Creation durch ubiquitären EService – eine innovative Angebotsform aus Sicht der Leistungslehre. In: Fließ/ Haase/Jacob/Ehret: Kundenintegration und Leistungslehre: Integrative Wertschöpfung in Dienstleistungen, Solutions und Entrepreneurship. Springer Gabler: 87-111.Google Scholar
  73. Richardson, H.A./Simmering, M.J./Sturman, M.C. (2009): A tale of three perspectives: Examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. In: Organizational Research Methods 12(4): 762-800.Google Scholar
  74. Ricker, T. (2017): Wanted: An Amazon fridge that automatically reorders food. https://theverge.com/2017/1/18/14308352/amazon-echo-refrigerator-reordersgroceries [2017-08-09].
  75. Roubroeks, M./Ham, J./Midden, C. (2011): When Artificial Social Agents Try to Persuade People: The Role of Social Agency on the Occurrence of Psychological Reactance. In: International Journal of Social Robotics 3(2): 155-165.Google Scholar
  76. Roussos, G./Moussouri, T. (2004): Consumer perceptions of privacy, security and trust in ubiquitous commerce. In: Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(6): 416- 429.Google Scholar
  77. Rust, R.T./Huang, M.-H. (2014): The Service Revolution and the Transformation of Marketing Science. In: Marketing Science 33(2): 206-221.Google Scholar
  78. Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In: Heijmans/Pollock/Satorra: Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis: a festschrift for Heinz Neudecker. Springer: 233-247.Google Scholar
  79. Satorra, A./Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: von Eye/Clogg: Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. Sage: 399-419.Google Scholar
  80. Satorra, A./Bentler, P.M. (2001): A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. In: Psychometrika 66(4): 507-514.Google Scholar
  81. Scholderer, J./Balderjahn, I. (2006): Was unterscheidet harte und weiche Strukturgleichungsmodelle nun wirklich? Ein Klärungsversuch zur LISREL-PLSFrage. In: Marketing ZFP 28(1): 57-70.Google Scholar
  82. Seiders, K./Voss, G.B./Godfrey, A.L./Grewal, D. (2007): SERVCON: Development and validation of a multidimensional service convenience scale. In: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 35(1): 144-156.Google Scholar
  83. Seligman, M.E./Maier, S.F. (1968): Alleviation of Learned Helplessness in the Dog. In: Journal of Abnormal Psychology 73(3): 256-262.Google Scholar
  84. Shadish, W.R./Cook, T.D./Campbell, D.T. (2002): Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  85. Shen, L./Dillard, J.P. (2007): Reactance Proneness Assessment. In: Reynolds/ Woods/Baker: Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurements. Information Science Reference: 323-328.Google Scholar
  86. Sörbom (1974): A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. In: British Journal for Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 27(2): 229-239.Google Scholar
  87. Spínola, R.O./Travassos, G.H. (2012): Towards a framework to characterize ubiquitous software projects. In: Information and Software Technology 54(7): 759-785.Google Scholar
  88. Strang, T./Linnhoff-Popien, C. (2004): A Context Modeling Survey. In: De Roure/Indulska: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Advanced Context Modelling, Reasoning and Management. University of Southampton: 34-41.Google Scholar
  89. Temme, D./Paulssen, M./Hildebrandt, L. (2009): Common Method Variance: Ursachen, Auswirkungen und Kontrollmöglichkeiten. In: Die Betriebswirtschaft 69(2): 123-146.Google Scholar
  90. Thompson, M.S./Green, S.B. (2013): Evaluating Between-Groups Differences in Latent Variable Means. In: Hancock/Mueller: Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 2nd edition. Information Age Publishing: 163-218.Google Scholar
  91. Vargo, S.L./Lusch, R.F. (2004): Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. In: Journal of Marketing 68(1): 1-17.Google Scholar
  92. Vargo, S.L./Lusch, R.F. (2008): From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. In: Industrial Marketing Management 37(3): 254-259.Google Scholar
  93. Wegener, D.T./Petty, R.E./Smoak, N.D./Fabrigar, L.R. (2004): Multiple Routes to Resisting Attitude Change. In: Knowles/Linn: Resistance and Persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum: 13-38.Google Scholar
  94. Weiber, R./Mohr, L./Weiber, T. (2017): Butler-Services als Dienstleistungen 4.0 zur Entlastung von Konsumenten in ihren Alltagsprozessen. In: Bruhn/Hadwich: Dienstleistungen 4.0: Konzepte – Methoden – Instrumente. Band 1. Forum Dienstleistungsmanagement. Springer Gabler: 61-96.Google Scholar
  95. Weiber, R./Mühlhaus, D. (2014): Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. 2. Auflage. Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  96. Weiser, M. (1991): The Computer for the 21st Century. In: Scientific American 265(3): 94-104.Google Scholar
  97. Wendlandt, M./Schrader, U. (2007): Consumer reactance against loyalty programs. In: Journal of Consumer Marketing 24(5): 293-304.Google Scholar
  98. Wierich, R. (2008): Personalisierung und Individualisierung von Coupons: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Kundenbindungswirkung individualisierter und personalisierter Coupons. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  99. Williams, L.J./Hartman, N./Cavazotte, F. (2010): Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique. In: Organizational Research Methods 13(3):477-514.Google Scholar
  100. Wortman, C.B./Brehm, J.W. (1975): Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In: Berkowitz: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: Volume 8. Academic Press: 277- 336.Google Scholar
  101. Zeithaml, V.A./Parasuraman, A./Berry, L.L. (1985): Problems and Strategies in Service Marketing. In: Journal of Marketing 49(2): 33-46.Google Scholar
  102. Zeng, D./Guo, S./Cheng, Z. (2011): The Web of Things: A Survey. In: Journal of Communications 6(6): 424-438.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HWTKBaden-BadenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations