Advertisement

Horizontal integration in container liner shipping

  • Khoi Tran Nguyen
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Our chapter is to study the situation of container liner shipping, one of the most important modes of international transportation. We concentrate on the strategic decisions of operators in order to survive and grow in the bitter market. To seek competitive advantage, shipping lines have made use of various strategies such as capacity expansion, merger and acquisition, and alliance. While they have competed with other rivals, they also co-operated through the long-term commitment of strategic alliances or short-term agreement of slot exchange or joint operation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Alix, Y.; Slack, B and Comtois, C. (1999). Alliance or acquisition? Strategies for growth in the container shipping industry, the case of CP ships. Journal of Transport Geography, 7, 203-208.Google Scholar
  2. Alphaliner (2012). Top 100 Operated fleets as per 17 July 2012. Retrieved August 17 2012 from the World Wide Web: http://www.alphaliner.com/top100/index.php.
  3. Anonymous. (1995). Global Alliance’s plans emerge. Containerisation International, November 1995, p 13.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. (1996a). P&O Containers and Nedlloyd unify. Containerisation International, October 1996, p 9.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous. (1996b). Kline/Yangming/Cosco deal emerges. Containerisation International, September 1996, p 15.Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous. (1997a). CP Ships’s Ray Miles dismisses merger option. Containerisation International, January 1997, p 7.Google Scholar
  7. Anonymous. (1997b). Relentless cost pressure. American Shipper, July 1997, 13-17.Google Scholar
  8. Anonymous. (1997c). Carriers vs. Forwarders. American Shipper, July 1997, 17-19.Google Scholar
  9. Anonymous. (2005a). Hapag Lloyd bids for CP Ships. Containerisation International, October 2005, p 9.Google Scholar
  10. Anonymous. (2005b). APMM completes buyout of RPONL. CI September 2005, p 11.Google Scholar
  11. Beddow, M. (2005). Timing is everything. Containerisation International, June 2005, 40-41.Google Scholar
  12. Brooks, M. (2008). Sea change in liner shipping. Bingley: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boyes, J. R. C. (1995). Mutual benefits. Containerisation International, November 1996, 50-53.Google Scholar
  14. Boyes, J. R. C. (1996). An easy Alliance. Containerisation International, January 1996, 51-53.Google Scholar
  15. Cariou, P. and Haralambides, H. E. (1999). Capacity pools in the liner market: An allocation model for the East-West trades. In Proceedings of IAME Conference, Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Cariou, P. (2002). Strategic Alliances in Liner Shipping: An Analysis of “Operational Synergies”. In Proceedings of IAME Conference 13-15 November. Panama, Panama.Google Scholar
  17. Containerisation International – CI (various years). Containerisation International Yearbook. London: Informa.Google Scholar
  18. Clarkson (2012). The Containership register. London: Clarkson Research Services Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Crichton, J. (1996). Eight plus six makes one. Containerisation International, October 1996, 43-45.Google Scholar
  20. Drewry. (1999). Containership charter market: A positive Course for the new Millenium. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Drewry. (2008, 2009, 2011). Container market - annual review and forecast. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants.Google Scholar
  22. Dynamar (2002). Top 25 container liner operators trading profiles. Alkmar: Dynamar.Google Scholar
  23. Fossey, J. (1990). Top 20 carriers consolidate. Containerisation International, June 1990, 46-49.Google Scholar
  24. Fossey, J. (1997). NOL/APL shockwaves. Containerisation International, December 1997, 6-7.Google Scholar
  25. Fusilo, M. (2009). Structural factors underlying mergers and acquisitions in liner shipping. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 11, 209-226.Google Scholar
  26. Michaels, D. (2012). Plane Lessor Avolon Sets Boeing Order. The Wall Street Journal, July 12, p 13.Google Scholar
  27. Midoro, R and Pitto, A. (2000). A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 27(1), 31-40.Google Scholar
  28. Porter, J. (2006). Maersk faces P&O Nedlloyd invoice crisis. Lloyd’s list, 31.08.2006, p 1.Google Scholar
  29. Ryo, D. K. and Thanopoulou, H. A. (1999). Liner alliances in the globalization era: a strategic tool for Asian container carriers. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(4), 349-367.Google Scholar
  30. Sheppard, E. J. and Seidman, D. (2001). Ocean Shipping Alliances: The Wave of the Future? International Journal of Maritime Economics, 3, 351-367.Google Scholar
  31. Slack, B; Comtois, C and McCalla, R. (2002). Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective. Maritime Policy and Management, 29(1), 65-76.Google Scholar
  32. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. UNCTAD (2013). Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
  34. Watanabe, I. (2000). The Fifth Generation of Containerisation: A Mixed Outlook. Ports and Harbors, April 2000, 11-15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SingapurSingapur

Personalised recommendations