Net Neutrality: Anatomy of a Controversy

  • Sebastian GießmannEmail author
Part of the Medien der Kooperation book series (MEKOO)


There is no neutrality when it comes to net neutrality. Set up in the trenches between digital infrastructure and new media publics, net neutrality has become one of the defining controversies of internet governance, concerning fundamental questions regarding access, digital civil rights and the net’s affordances.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belli, Luca, and Jamila Venturini. 2016. Private ordering and the rise of terms of service as cyber-regulation. Internet Policy Review. Journal on Internet Regulation 5 (4).
  2. Bendrath, Ralf, and Milton Muller. 2011. The End of the Net as We Know it? Deep Packet Inspection and Internet Governance. New Media & Society 13 (7): 1142-1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan L. Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, Bundestagsfraktion. 2010. Gegen das Zwei-Klassen-Internet – Netzneutralität in Europa dauerhaft gewährleisten. Antrag an den Deutschen Bundes-tag, 17. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 17/3688.Google Scholar
  5. Busch, Lawrence. 2011. Standards. Recipes for Reality. Infrastructures. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, David D., and Marjory S. Blumenthal. 2011. The End-to-End Argument and Application Design: The Role of Trust. Federal Communications Law Journal 63 (2): 357-390.Google Scholar
  7. Day, John. 2008. Patterns in Network Architecture. A Return to Fundamentals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  8. Day, John. 2011. How in the Heck Do You Lose a Layer!? In 2011 International Conference on the Network of the Future: 135–143.
  9. Denardis, Laura. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Emerson, Lori, and John Day. 2015. What’s Wrong With the Internet and How We Can Fix It: Interview With Internet Pioneer John Day. Accessed: 10 August 2017.
  11. FCC. 2015. Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet: A Rule by the Federal Communications Commission on 04/13/2015. Accessed: 16 October 2017.
  12. Frischmann, Brett M. 2012. Infrastructure. The Social Value of Shared Resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gießmann, Sebastian. 2014. Im Parlament der möglichen Medienpraktiken. Anmerkungen zur Netzneutralitätskontroverse. Mediale Kontrolle unter Beobachtung 4 (1): 1-22. Accessed: 16 October 2017.
  14. Gillespie, Tarleton. 2006. Engineering a Principle: ‘End-to-End’ in the Design of the Internet. Social Studies of Science 36 (3): 427-457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilroy, Angele A. 2017. The Net Neutrality Debate: Access to Broadband Networks. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Accessed: 20 Februar 2018.
  16. Internet und digitale Gesellschaft, Enquete-Kommission. 2012. Zwischenbericht Netzneutralität. Bundestags-Drucksache 17/8536 vom 2. Februar 2012. In Enquete-Kommission Internet und digitale Gesellschaft, vol. 2, Ed. Sekretariat der Enquete-Kommission Internet und digitale Gesellschaft Deutscher Bundestag, 1-55. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
  17. John, Richard R. 2010. Network Nation. Inventing American Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kastrenakes, Jacob. 2014. FCC received a total of 3.7 million comments on net neutrality. The Verge. Accessed: 16 October 2017.
  19. Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio. 2003. Biomedical Platforms. Realigning the Normal and the Pathological in Late-Twentieth-Century Medicine. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kelty, Christopher. 2005. Geeks, Social Imaginaries, and Recursive Publics. Cultural Anthropology 20 (2): 185-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marres, Noortje. 2005. Issues Spark a Public into Being. A Key But Often Forgotten Point of the Lippmann-Dewey Debate. In Making Things Public. Atmospheres of Democracy, Eds. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, 208-217. Karlsruhe; Cambridge, MA; London: ZKM; MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Musiani, Francesca, Valérie Schafer, and Hervé Le Crosnier. 2012. Net Neutrality as an Internet Governance Issue: The Globalization of an American-Born Debate. Revue française d’études américaines 4 (134): 47-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1987. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts. Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge Might Benefit Each Other. In The Social Construction of Technological Systems. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, Eds. Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor J. Pinch, 17-50. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Powell, Alison. 2015. Openness and Enclosure in Mobile Internet Architecture. In Theories of the Mobile Internet. Materialities and Imaginaries. Routledge Studies in New Media and Cyberculture, Eds. Andrew Herman, Jon Hadlaw, and Thom Swiss, 25-44. New York; Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Reed, David P., Jerome H. Saltzer, and David D. Clark. 1998. Active Networking and End-to-End Arguments. IEEE Network 12 (3): 69-71.
  26. Reißmann, Wolfgang, Sebastian Gießmann, and Mundo Yang. 2017. On Boundary Publics, Presentation at the Workshop “Digital Platforms and Boundary Infrastructures”, Siegen University, 2 November 2017 (unpublished).Google Scholar
  27. Russell, Andrew L. 2014. Open Standards and the Digital Age. History, Ideology, and Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Saltzer, Jerome H., David Patrick Reed, and David Dana Clark. 1984. End-To-End Arguments in System Design. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 2 (4): 277-288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schafer, Valérie, and Hervé Le Crosnier. 2011. La neutralité de l’Internet. Un enjeu de communication. Paris: CNRS éditions.Google Scholar
  30. Schewick, Barbara van. 2010. Internet Architecture and Innovation. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schewick, Barbara van. 2012. Network Neutrality and Quality of Service: What a Non-Discrimination Rule Should Look Like. Harvard: The Center for Internet and Society (CIS). Accessed: 8 October 2017.
  32. Schüttpelz, Erhard. 2015. Von einem neuerdings erhobenen tragischen Ton in der Geschichte des Internets. Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 13 (2): 139-142.Google Scholar
  33. Schüttpelz, Erhard. 2017. Infrastructural Media and Public Media. Media in Action 1 (1): 13-61.Google Scholar
  34. Seemann, Michael. 2012. Plattformneutralität – das politische Denken der Piraten. In Unter Piraten. Erkundungen in einer neuen politischen Arena. Eds. Christoph Bieber and Claus Leggewie, 91-99. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  35. Seemann, Michael. 2015. Digital Tailspin: Ten Rules for the Internet After Snowden. Network Notebooks, vol. 9, Amsterdam: Institute for Network Cultures. Accessed: 10 August 2017.
  36. Soni, Aayush. 2016. India Deals Blow to Facebook in People-Powered ‘Net Neutrality’ Row. The Guardian. Accessed: 10 August 2017.
  37. Sprenger, Florian. 2015. The Politics of Micro-Decisions: Edward Snowden, Net Neutrality, and the Architectures of the Internet. Lüneburg: Meson Press.Google Scholar
  38. Star, Susan Leigh. 1989. The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions. Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Research Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Eds. Les Gasser and Michael N. Huhns, 37-54 London: Pitman; San Mateo, CF: Morgan Kaufmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. This is Not a Boundary Object. Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601-617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology,’Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture. Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wikipedia. 2018a. Net Neutrality. Accessed: 20 February 2018.
  43. Wikipedia. 2018b. Net neutrality in the United States. Accessed: 20 February 2018.
  44. Wu, Tim. 2003. Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law 2: 141–179.Google Scholar
  45. Wu, Tim. 2011. The Master Switch. The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  46. Wu, Tim, and Lawrence Lessig. 2003. Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC. Re: Ex Parte Submission in CS Docket No. 02-52. Accessed: 30 November 2016.
  47. Yates, JoAnne, and Craig Murphy. 2019. Engineering Rules. Global Standard Setting since 1880. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zittrain, Jonathan. 2008. The Future of the Internet. And How to Stop It. New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar


  1. Oliver, John. 2014a. Net Neutrality: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO), June 1, 2014. Accessed: 22 February 2018.
  2. Oliver, John. 2014b. Tom Wheeler Is Not A Dingo: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO), June 15, 2014, Accessed: 22 February 2018.
  3. Oliver, John. 2015. Best of Last Week Tonight With John Oliver; Net Neutrality Update, July 27, 2015, Accessed: 22 February 2018.
  4. Oliver, John. 2017a. Net Neutrality II: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO), May 7, 2017. Cf. Accessed: 22 February 2018.
  5. Oliver, John. 2017b. Net Neutrality Update: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (Web Exclusive), May 14, 2017, Accessed: 22 February 2018.
  6. John, Richard and Tim Wu. 2010. Big Media: Pro and Con – Tim Wu and Richard R. John, Columbia Law School and Columbia Journalism School, November 30, 2010, Accessed: 22 February 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Siegen, Media StudiesSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations