Advertisement

Power Dynamics in Online Communities: The Palestinian Case

Chapter
  • 451 Downloads
Part of the Studies in International, Transnational and Global Communications book series (SITGC)

Abstract

While there is a large amount of literature discussing the impact of new Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and social network sites (SNS) on activism and social movements, less attention has been given to the implications of these technologies on the dynamics within these activism circles and social activist groups.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aouragh, M. (2011). Palestine Online, Transnationalism, the internet and the construction of identity. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 33-48.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, W. (2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143-168.Google Scholar
  4. Bimber, B. (2000). The study of information technology and civic engagement. Political Communication, 17(4), 329–333.Google Scholar
  5. Bishara, A. (2009). New Media and Political Change: The Case of the Two Palestinian Intifadas. Mediterranean Programme Series. EUI RSCAS; 2009/21.Google Scholar
  6. Bonfadelli, H. (2002). The Internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication, 17(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (p. 29-47). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J. C (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.Google Scholar
  16. Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33(5), 525-554.Google Scholar
  17. Calhoun, C. (1998). Community without Propinquity Revisted: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry, 68(3), 373–97.Google Scholar
  18. Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Malden, MA et al.: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266.Google Scholar
  21. Diani, M. (2000). Social Movement Networks Virtual and Real. Information, Communication and Society, 3(3), 386-01.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 307-336.Google Scholar
  23. Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Carty, V. (2011). Wired and mobilizing: Social movements, new technology, and electoral politics. New York and Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Earl, J., Kimport, K., Prieto, G., Rush, C., & Reynoso, K. (2010). Changing the world one webpage at a time: Conceptualizing and explaining Internet activism. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 15(4), 425-446.Google Scholar
  26. Elin, L. (2003). The radicalization of Zeke Spier: How the Internet contributes to civic engagement and new forms of social capital. In M. McCarthy & M.D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (p. 97–114). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 202–224.Google Scholar
  28. Geser, H. (2001). On the Functions and Consequences of the Internet for Social Movements and Voluntary Associations. Sociology in Switzerland: Social Movements, Pressure Groups and Political Parties. Online Publications. Zurich, March, 2.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, R. K., Howard, P. E., & Ward, S. (2000). Social capital, Internet connectedness & political participation: A four-country study. Prepared for the 2000 International Political Science Association, Québec, Canada. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=A7F36DA8F859F09FA0B5C9749C8C72DE?doi=10.1.1.11.8677&rep=rep1&-type=pdf
  30. Groshek, J. (2009). The democratic effects of the Internet, 1994—2003: A cross-national inquiry of 152 countries. International Communication Gazette, 71(3), 115-136.Google Scholar
  31. Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading ethnographic eesearch: A critical guide. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  32. Hanafi, S. (2005). Reshaping geography: Palestinian community networks in Europe and the new media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(3), 581-598.Google Scholar
  33. Harlow, S., & Guo, L. (2014). Will the revolution be tweeted or facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(3), 463-478.Google Scholar
  34. Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 35-48.Google Scholar
  36. Iazzolino, G. (2010). Digital Shahid – From Broadcast Media to Citizen Journalism in Palestine. Arab Media Society (12). Retrieved from http://www.arabmediasociety.com/articles/downloads/20101211120136_Iazzolino.pdf
  37. Jamali, M., & Abolhassani, H. (2006, December). Different aspects of social network analysis. In 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (p. 66-72). Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4061321
  38. Kidd, D. (2003). Indymedia.org: a new communications commons. In M. McCarthy & M.D. Ayers (Eds.), Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (p. 47–69). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Lei, Y. W. (2011). The political consequences of the rise of the Internet: Political beliefs and practices of Chinese netizens. Political Communication, 28(3), 291-322.Google Scholar
  40. Leizerov, S. (2000). Privacy advocacy groups versus intel. A case study of how social movements are tactically using the internet to fight corporations. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 461-483.Google Scholar
  41. Lynch, M. (2011). After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 301–310.Google Scholar
  42. Masoud, T. (2011). The Road to (and from) Liberation Square. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 20–34.Google Scholar
  43. Morozov, E. (2009). Iran: Downside to the ‘‘Twitter revolution’’. Dissent, 56(4), 10–14.Google Scholar
  44. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  45. Myers, D. J. (2000). Media, communication technology, and protest waves. In Trabalho apresentado na conferência. Social Movement Analysis: The Network Perspective, Ross Priory, Scotland (p. 22-25).Google Scholar
  46. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Norris, P. (2004). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. In P. N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The Internet in context (p. 31–41). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and Political Participation Exploring the Explanatory Links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 435-459.Google Scholar
  49. Postmes, T., & Brunsting, S. (2002). Collective action in the age of the Internet mass communication and online mobilization. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 290-301.Google Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  51. Qawasmi H. & Othman D., (2016). Hashtag Palestine: Palestinian Social Media Activity during7amleh – Arab Center for Social Media Advancement. Retrieved from http://www.7amleh.org/en/article/62
  52. Rheingold. H. (1993). The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  53. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. New York: Perseus.Google Scholar
  54. Rheingold, H. (2008). Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In W. L. Bennett (Eds.), Civic life online: learning how digital media can engage youth (p. 97–118). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rubin, H. & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Sassenberg, K., & Postmes, T. (2002). Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 463-480.Google Scholar
  57. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody! The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Shulman, S. W. (2009). The case against mass e-mails: Perverse incentives and low quality public participation in the U.S. federal rulemaking. Policy and Internet, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.psocommons.org/policyandinternet/vol1/iss1/art2/
  59. Siapera, E. (2010). Networked Palestine: Exploring Power in Online Palestinian Networks. Orient – Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Politik und Wirtschaft des Orients, 51(1), 25-37.Google Scholar
  60. Slouka, M. (1995). War of the Worlds: Cyberspace and the High-tech Assault on Reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  61. Social Studio (2016). Social Media Report in Palestine. Retrieved from https://socialstudio.me/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SMRP2016-Eng.pdf
  62. Stein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites. New Media & Society, 11(5), 749-771.Google Scholar
  63. Stevenson, W. B., & Greenberg, D. (2000). Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 651-678.Google Scholar
  64. Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299–314.Google Scholar
  67. Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107-114.Google Scholar
  68. Walther, M. (2014) Repatriation to France and Germany, A Comparative Study Based on Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberplace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227-252.Google Scholar
  71. Wellman, B. (2000). Changing connectivity: A future history of Y2. 03K. Sociological Research Online, 4(4). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/wellman.html
  72. Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the Digital Age. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson, C. (2013). Interview techniques for UX practitioners: A user-centered design method. Newnes: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations