Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Personal communication from Dr Ian Thomson.
References
ACARA (2018). Australian Curriculum/Mathematics/Aims. http://australian-curriculum.org/mathematics/aims. Accessed: 24 Jan 2018.
Anderson, A., Mayes, J. T., & Kibby, M. R. (1995). Small group collaborative discovery learning from hypertext. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 23–38). New York: Springer.
Blum, W., et al. (2002). ICMI study 14: applications and modelling in mathematics education – discussion document. Andersen and Heilesen, 51(1), 149–171.
Burkhardt, H. (2006). Modelling in mathematics classrooms: reflections on past developments and the future. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 178–195.
CCSSI (2012). Mathematics: standards for mathematical practice – model with mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/MP4. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
Clatworthy, N. J., & Galbraith, P. L. (1991). Mathematical modelling in senior school mathematics: implementing an innovation. Teaching Mathematics and Applications, 10(1), 6–28.
Dunne, T., & Galbraith, P. (2003). Mathematical modelling as pedagogy – impact of an immersion program. In Q. Ye, W. Blum, K. S. Houston & Q. Jiang (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education and culture (pp. 16–30). Chichester: Horwood.
Galbraith, P. (2006). Real world problems: developing principles of design. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures and learning spaces. Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra. (Vol. 1, pp. 229–236). Adelaide: MERGA.
Galbraith, P. (2015). Modelling, education, and the epistemic fallacy. In G. Stillman, W. Blum & M. Salett Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice (pp. 339–349). Switzerland: Springer.
Galbraith, P. L., & Clatworthy, N. J. (1990). Beyond standard models: meeting the challenge of modelling. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 137–163.
Julie, C., & Mudaly, V. (2007). Mathematical Modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 503–510). New York: Springer.
Kaiser, G., & Sriraman, B. (2006). A global survey of international perspectives on modeling in mathematics education. Andersen and Heilesen, 38(3), 302–310.
Maaß, K., & Mischo, C. (2011). Implementing modelling into day-to-day teaching practice – the project STRATUM and its framework. Journal Mathematik-Didaktic, 32, 103–131.
Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer.
OECD (2009). Mathematics framework. In OECD PISA 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 10, pp. 83–123). Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI 10.178719789264062658-4-en.
Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21, 73–98.
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Reinhard, P., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 215–237.
Schukajlow, S., Krug, A., & Rakoczy, K. (2015a). Effects of prompting multiple solutions for modelling problems on students’ performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, 393–417.
Schukajlow, S., Kolter, J., & Blum, W. (2015b). Scaffolding mathematical modelling with a solution plan. ZDM. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0707-2.
Vygotsky, L. D. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. Caffee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.
Zbiek, R., & Connor, A. (2006). Beyond motivation: exploring mathematical modeling as a context for deepening students’ understandings of curricular mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 89–112.
Zöttl, L., Ufer, S., & Reiss, K. (2010). Modelling with heuristic worked examples in the KOMMA learning environment. Journal Mathematik-Didaktic, 31, 143–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Codes
Coding and decoding messages can be carried out using matrices with the aid of modular arithmetic. In modular arithmetic we say, for example, that \( 18 \equiv 4(\text{mod}\ 7) \) because the remainder is 4 when 18 is divided by 7. Modulo 26 is useful for representing the letters of the alphabet. In modulo 26 we can say, for example, \( 85 \equiv 7(\text{mod}\ 26)\). A positive remainder can be found for negative numbers. For example, \( -15 \equiv 11(\text{mod}\ 26)\) since \( 26 \times -1 +11 = -15\). The multiplicative inverse can sometimes, but not always, be found. For example, \( 9^{-1}(\text{mod}\ 26)=3\) because \( 9\times 3 (\text{mod}\ 26)\) results in the identity element, 1.
Using 2 × 2 matrices, a message can be coded as shown in this example:
Starting with the message LEAVE NOW, the message is divided into pairs of letters. Each letter is represented by a number in the range from 0 to 25 according to its position in the alphabet, where the letters A–Y are numbered 1–25 and Z is numbered 0. In this case the message becomes,
The pairs of numbers are then entered as columns in a matrix, which is then pre‐multiplied by a secret 2 × 2 matrix to produce the code.
If the secret 2 × 2 matrix is \( A=\begin{bmatrix} 3&1 \\ 5&4 \end{bmatrix}\), then the code would become:
which is \( \begin{bmatrix} 15 & 25 & 3 & 16 \\ 2 & 15 & 3 & 5 \end{bmatrix}\) mod 26 and which represents: OB YO CC PE.
If the secret 2 × 2 matrix is known, then the message can be decoded by pre‐multiplying it by A −1 where \( A^{-1}=(ad - bc)^{-1}\begin{bmatrix}d & -b \\ -c & a\end{bmatrix}(\text{mod}\ 26)\) and \( (ad - bc)^{-1}\) is the multiplicative inverse of \( (ad - bc)\) in modulo 26.
-
a)
Imagine you are a spy. Compose a message comprising of at least 8 letters and code the message using a suitable secret 2 × 2 matrix. Use MATLAB to perform the matrix operations and submit a print‐out of your working.
-
b)
Show how the coded message you created in part (a) can be decoded using the secret 2 × 2 matrix. Use MATLAB to perform the matrix operations and submit a print‐out of your working.
Now compose a message with at least 50 letters. Using a suitable 4 × 4 matrix, code the message and show how it can be decoded. Use MATLAB to perform the matrix operations and submit a print‐out of your working.
Describe one strength and one limitation of the methods you used in this investigation to create codes (included two additional tasks including an open problem).
-
(a)
Identify one significant assumption that was made in this investigation regarding language and describe, using examples, how you could adapt your method to allow for this assumption.
-
(b)
Comment briefly on the reasonableness of your results with reference to real world data.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galbraith, P. (2018). Beyond Lip Service: Sustaining Modelling in Curricula and Coursework. In: Schukajlow, S., Blum, W. (eds) Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren. Realitätsbezüge im Mathematikunterricht. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20325-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20325-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-20324-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-20325-2
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)