Advertisement

Kein Ende in Sicht: Die Polarisierung im US-Kongress

  • David SirakovEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Polarisierung im US-Kongress stieg in den letzten Jahrzehnten stetig an. Mittlerweile ist Bipartisanship eher die Ausnahme, als die Regel. Dies hat weitreichende Effekte, nicht nur auf die Gesetzgebung, sondern auch auf Wahlkämpfe.

Schlüsselwörter

Kongress USA Polarisierung Bipartisanship Legislative USA 

Literatur

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., Alexander, B., & Gunning, M. (2006). Don’t Blame Redistricting for Uncompetitive Elections. PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (01), (S. 87–90).Google Scholar
  2. Aisch, G., Keller, J., Lai, K. K. R., & Yourish, K. (2017). Scalia’s Supreme Court Seat Has Been Vacant For More Than 400 Days. The New York Times, 20. März. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/15/us/supreme-court-nominations-election-year-scalia.html. Zugegriffen: 25. April 2017.
  3. Blake, A. (2017). Why you should stop blaming gerrymandering so much. Really. In The Washington Post, 8. April. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/04/08/why-you-should-stop-blaming-gerrymandering-so-much-really/?tid=sm_fb&utm_term=.745ad34021e7. Zugegriffen: 09. April 2017.
  4. Bradner, E. (2017). GOP lawmakers brace for new round of town hall backlash. 11. April. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/11/politics/republican-congress-town-halls/. Zugegriffen: 12. April 2017.
  5. Bycoffe, A. (2017). Introducing The Trump Score. FiveThirtyEight, 30. Januar. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/introducing-the-trump-score/. Zugegriffen: 01. Februar 2017.
  6. CNN. (2017). Anger erupts at GOP town hall. http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/02/10/chaffetz-town-hall-booing-do-your-job-chant-sot.cnn. Zugegriffen: 11. Februar 2017.
  7. Congressional Record. (2017). Congressional Proceedings and Debates of the 115th Congress, First Session. 7. Februar.Google Scholar
  8. Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (2005). Setting the Agenda. Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Daley, D. (2017). Trump can’t stop the Freedom Caucus. He has GOP gerrymandering to blame. The Washington Post, 29. März. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/03/29/trump-cant-stop-the-freedom-caucus-he-has-gop-gerrymandering-to-blame/?utm_term=.c7476e2b35e0. Zugegriffen: 10. April 2017.
  10. Fiorina, M. P., & Levendusky, M. S. (2006). Disconnected: The Political Class versus the People. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Hrsg.), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics (S. 49–71). Washington (DC): Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  11. Flegenheimer, M., & Kaplan, T. (2017). Republicans Charge Into Resistance at Tumultuous Town Halls. The New York Times, 18. Februar. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/18/us/politics/town-hall-protests-obamacare.html. Zugegriffen: 20. Februar 2017.
  12. Garrett, M. (2010). Top GOP Priority: Make Obama a One-Term President. National Journal, 29. Oktober. https://www.nationaljournal.com/member/magazine/top-gop-priority-make-obama-a-one-term-president-20101023. Zugegriffen: 10. Februar 2014.
  13. Haas, C. M. (2016). Obama als Legislative Leader: Die Beziehungen zum Kongress unter den Bedingungen von Unified und Divided Government. In W. Gellner & P. Horst (Hrsg.), Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obamas (S. 197–223). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  14. Huetteman, E., & Alcindor, Y. (2017). Betsy DeVos Confirmed as Education Secretary; Pence Breaks Tie. The New York Times, 7. Februar. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/07/us/politics/betsy-devos-education-secretary-confirmed.html. Zugegriffen: 08. Februar 2017.
  15. Masket, S. E., Winburn, J., & Wright, G. C. (2012). The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won’t Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It. PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (01), (S. 39–43).Google Scholar
  16. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2009). Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization? American Journal of Political Science 53 (3), (S. 666–680).Google Scholar
  17. McCullough, D. G. (2001). John Adams. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  18. Mieczkowski, Y. (2001). The Routledge historical atlas of presidential elections. Routledge atlases of American history. New York: Routledge,. Publisher description. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0651/00030014-d.html.
  19. Neidig, H. (2016). No hearing for Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, McConnell says. The Hill, 16. März. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273230-mcconnell-no-hearing-for-garland. Zugegriffen: 25. Juli 2016.
  20. O’Keefe, E., & Sullivan, S. (2017). Senate Republicans go ‘nuclear,’ pave the way for Gorsuch confirmation to Supreme Court. The Washington Post, 6. April. https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/senate-poised-for-historic-clash-over-supreme-court-nominee-neil-gorsuch/2017/04/06/40295376-1aba-11e7-855e-4824bbb5d748_story.html?utm_term=.19111baaa0de. Zugegriffen: 07. April 2017.
  21. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, E. (2015). Paul Ryan is doomed, too. The Washington Post, 22. Oktober. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/paul-ryan-is-doomed/2015/10/22/4dce4352-78e9-11e5-bc80-9091021aeb69_story.html. Zugegriffen: 18. Dezember 2015.
  23. Sirakov, D. (2016a). Das Repräsentantenhaus in der Präsidentschaft Obamas: Triebfeder der politischen Polarisierung? In W. Gellner & P. Horst (Hrsg.), Die USA am Ende der Präsidentschaft Barack Obama. Eine erste Bilanz (S. 247–265). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Sirakov, D. (2016b). Politik in der Krise? Polarisierungsdynamiken im politischen Prozess. In C. Lammert, M. B. Siewert & B. Vormann (Hrsg.), Handbuch Politik USA (S. 617–636). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  25. Snowe, O. J. (2013). Fighting for Common Ground. How We can Fix the Stalemate in Congress. New York (NY): Weinstein Books.Google Scholar
  26. Stein, J. (2017). Hundreds chant ‘Do your job!’ at House Republican in charge of investigating Trump. CNBC, 10. Februar. http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/10/hundreds-chant-do-your-job-at-house-republican-in-charge-of-investigating-donald-trump.html. Zugegriffen: 11. Februar 2017.
  27. Stonecash, J. M., Brewer, M. D., & Mariani, M. D. (2003). Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Transforming American Politics. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. The New York Times. (2017). How House Republicans Planned to Vote on the Obamacare Replacement. 14. April. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/03/20/us/politics/health-care-whip-count.html. Zugegriffen: 17. April 2017.
  29. Theriault, S. M. (2008). Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Theriault, S. M. (2013). The Gingrich Senators. The Roots Of Partisan Warfare In Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Senate. (2013). Standing Rules of the Senate. Washington (DC). https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CDOC-113sdoc18/pdf/CDOC-113sdoc18.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Dezember 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KaiserslauternDeutschland

Personalised recommendations