Advertisement

Why Google Can’t Save Us

The Challenges of our Post-Gutenberg Moment
  • Sam WineburgEmail author
  • Joel Breakstone
  • Sarah McGrew
  • Teresa Ortega
Chapter

Abstract

The Stanford History Education Group has prototyped, field tested, and validated a bank of assessments that tap civic online reasoning—the ability to judge the credibility of the information that floods young people’s smartphones, tablets, and computers. We developed 56 tasks and administered them to students across 12 states. In total, we collected and analyzed 7,804 student responses. From pre-teens to seniors in college, students struggled mightily to evaluate online information. To investigate how people determine the credibility of digital information, we sampled 45 individuals: 10 PhD historians, 10 professional fact checkers, and 25 Stanford University undergraduates. We observed them as they evaluated websites and engaged in open web searches on social and political issues. Historians and students often fell victim to easily manipulated features of websites, such as official-looking logos and domain names.

Keywords

Civic Online Reasoning Critical Thinking Digital Literacy Internet Media Literacy Information Credibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American College of Pediatricians (2015). “P” for pedophile. Retrieved from http://www.acpeds.org/p-for-pedophile
  2. American Press Institute (2015). How millennials get news: Inside the habits of America’s first digital generation. Retrieved from https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/millennials-news/
  3. Caulfield, M. (2017). How “news literacy” gets the web wrong. Retrieved from https://hapgood.us/2017/03/04/how-news-literacy-gets-the-web-wrong/
  4. Gasser, U., Cortesi, S., Malik, M., & Lee, A. (2012). Youth and digital media: From credibility to information quality. Cambridge, MA: The Berkman Center for Internet and Society.Google Scholar
  5. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
  6. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20100468
  7. Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
  8. Lynch, M. P. (2016). Googling is believing: Trumping the informed citizen. New York Times. Retrieved from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/03/09/googling-is-believingtrumping-the-informed-citizen/
  9. McGrew, S., & Wineburg, S. (2016). Reading Less and Learning More: Expertise in Evaluating the Credibility of Online Information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  10. McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J., & Wineburg, S. (2017). The challenge that’s bigger than fake news: Teaching students in engage in online civic reasoning. American Educator. Google Scholar
  11. Scanlon, C. (2009, January 21). The natives aren’t quite so Restless. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/opinion/the-natives-arent-quite-so-restless/story-e6frgcko-1111118616452
  12. Shanahan, T. (2012). What is close reading? Retrieved from http://shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/what-is-close-reading#sthash.mxxi0paG.rtIrn0KW.dpbs
  13. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  14. Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80043-3
  15. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking & other unnatural Acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wineburg, S. (in press). Stuck in the past: Why learn history when it is already on your iPhone? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2016). Why students can’t Google their way to truth. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/11/02/why-studentscant-google-their-way-to.html
  18. Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading and the nature of Expertise: Learning more and reading less when evaluating digital information. Technical Report No. 1701. Stanford, CA: Stanford History Education Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Wineburg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joel Breakstone
    • 1
  • Sarah McGrew
    • 1
  • Teresa Ortega
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations