Zusammenfassung
Mobiles Lernen ist in Bildungsorganisationen in komplexe Lernprozesse eingebettet. Jedoch greifen einfache Funktionsanpassungen von Online-Lernumgebungen für mobile Endgeräte für die didaktische Unterrichtsgestaltung von Mobile Blended Learning zu kurz. In diesem Beitrag wird das Blended Learning-Konzept um die mobile Dimension erweitert und der Einfluss von Kontexten auf Lehr- und Lernprozesse untersucht. Dabei werden Lernkontexte als eigenständige und dynamische Faktoren berücksichtigt.
In Bezug auf „Kontext“ muss zwischen „Seamless Learning“ und „Mobile Blended Learning“ unterschieden werden. Seamless Learning stellt die aktive Gestaltung von Kontexten und deren Übergänge in das Zentrum der didaktischen Konzeption. Bei der didaktischen Gestaltung beeinflussen die Lernkontexte die Auswahl von Lehr- und Lernmitteln, Sozialformen und Aktivitätselementen. Im Gegensatz dazu werden beim Mobile Blended Learning die Lernkontexte durch die Auswahl von Lehr- und Lernmitteln bei der Gestaltung von Lernangeboten bestimmt. Dieses Kapitel stellt Seamless Learning und Mobile Blended Learning in einem integrativen Modell gegenüber. Auf der Basis dieser erweiterten Sicht auf Blended Learning wird anhand eines praktischen Beispiels der Einfluss von Kontexten auf mobile Lernerlebnisse in konventionellen Bildungsangeboten an der Hochschule erkundet.
Schlüsselwörter
- Kontextualisierung
- Learning Design
- Mobile Blended Learning
- Seamless Learning
- Aktivitätstheorie
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York/NY.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook 1: the classification of educational goals: Cognitive Domain. New York/NY.
Churchill, D., Fox, B., & King, M. (2016). Framework for Designing Mobile Learning Environments. In D. Churchill, J. Lu, T. K. F. Chiu & B. Fox (Eds.), Mobile Learning Design, Theories and Application. Singapore, 3-25.
Dillenbourg, P. (2015). Orchestration Graphs: Modeling Scalable Education. Lausanne (CH).
Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (Second Edition). New York/NY.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. M. (2004). Principles of Instructional Design, 5th Edition.
Orlando/FL. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco/CA.
Glahn, C. (2009). Contextual Support of Social Engagement and Reflection on the Web [Doctoral thesis]. Heerlen: Open University in The Netherlands. http://hdl.handle.net/1820/2062. Zugegriffen: 06. Juni 2017.
Glahn, C. (2013). Using the ADL Experience API for Mobile Learning, Sensing, Informing, Encouraging, Orchestrating. In K. Al-Begain, R. Bestak, N. Al-Beiruti & C. Turyagyenda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies, NGMAST 2013, 25-27 September 2013, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic. Prague, Czech Republic. https://doi.org/10.1109/ngmast.2013.55
Glahn, C. (2014). Mobile Learning Operating Systems. In M. Ally & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Increasing Access through Mobile Learning. Vancouver (CAN), 141-157.
Glahn, C., Gruber, M. R., & Tartakovski, O. (2015). Beyond Delivery Modes and Apps: A Case Study on Mobile Blended Learning in Higher Education. In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert & É. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9307. Heidelberg, 127-140.
Glahn, C., Hug, T., & Gassler, G. (2005). Embedded Lifelong Learning: Demands on the Integration of Learning into the Daily Routine. New Educational Review 5 (1), 243-254.
Koper, R. (2003). Combining re-usable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning. London, 46-59.
Koper, R., Olivier, B., & Anderson, T. (Eds.) (2003). IMS Learning Design Information Model. IMS Global Learning Consortium. https://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_infov1p0.html. Zugegriffen: 06. Juni 2017.
Kuh, G. D., Douglas, K. B., Lund, J. P., & Ramin-Gyurnek, J. (1994). Student Learning Outside the Classroom. Transcending Artificial Boundaries. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 8. Washington/DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED394444.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23.22.2017.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaikin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice, perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge (UK), 3-33.
Lave, J. (2009). The Practie of Learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning, Learning Theorists in their own words. London, New York/NY, 200-208.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge (UK).
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component Instructional Design. New York/NY.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On The Horizon. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional Design: What is it and Why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of their Current Status. New York/NY, 3-36.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2009). Situational Principles of Instruction. In C. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. III. New York/NY, 57-72.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Keller, J. B. (2009). Understanding Instruction. In C. Reigeluth & A. A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. III. New York/NY, 27-40.
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile Learning. Small Devices, Big Issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-Enhanced Learning, Principles and Products. Dordrecht, 233-249.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2006). A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research. Los Angeles, 221-247.
Specht, M. (2009). Learning in a Technology Enhanced World: Context in Ubiquitous Learning Support. http://hdl.handle.net/1820/2034. Zugegriffen: 06. Juni 2017.
Specht, M. (2015). Connecting Learning Contexts with Ambient Information Channels. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity (). Singapore, 121-140.
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ… . The International Review Of Research In Open And Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge (UK).
Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. D. (2014). Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Portland.
Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J. D., & Rowe, K. (2005). Technology for communities. In L. Langelier, CEFRIO (Eds.), Guide de mise en place et d’animation de communautés de pratique intentionelle. Québec (CAN). http://technologyforcommunities.com/CEFRIO_Book_Chapter_v_5.2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 06. Juni 2017.
Wong, L.-H. (2015). A Brief History of Mobile Seamless Learning. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless Learning in the Age of Mobile Connectivity. Singapore, 3-40.
Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education 57(4), 2364-2381.
Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., & Oppermann, R. (2007). An Operational Definition of Context. In B. Kokinov, D. C. Richardson, T. R. Roth-Berghofer & L. Vieu (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context: 6th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2007, Roskilde, Denmark, 20th-24th August 2007. Proceedings. Berlin, Heidelberg, 558-571.
Zimmermann, A., Specht, M., & Lorenz, A. (2005). Personalization and Context Management. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 15 (3), 275-302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glahn, C., Gruber, M.R. (2018). Mobile Blended Learning. In: de Witt, C., Gloerfeld, C. (eds) Handbuch Mobile Learning. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19123-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19123-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19122-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19123-8
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)