Skip to main content

Salient Appeals in Advertising Promoting Breast Self-Examination and Mammography Examination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Advertising Research VIII

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

Abstract

Due to the increased life expectancy and the adoption of unhealthy lifestyles in developed countries, cancer incidences are on the rise. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Breast cancer mortality can be reduced if the disease is detected and treated early.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 263-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer Society (2015). Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2015-2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barg, F. K., & Grier, S. A. (2008). Enhancing breast cancer communications: A cultural models approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(4), 335-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, C. E. (2002). Exploring antismoking ads: Appeals, themes, and consequences. Journal of Health Communication, 7(2), 123-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 140-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. L., Shumate, M. D., & Gold, A. (2007). Anti-smoking media campaign messages: Theory and practice. Health communication, 22(2), 91-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Davis, L. S., Rentz, K., & Vannoy, D. (1997). Influence of advertisement on women’s attitudes toward mammography screening. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 18(6), 603-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, E., Galekh, M., & Vonkeman, C. (2015). Is sexy better than funny? Disentangling the persuasive effects of pleasure and arousal across sex and humour appeals. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 406-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S123-S139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerringer, C. M. (2013). Winking and Giggling at Creeping Death: Thanatophobia and the Rhetoric of Save the Ta-Tas. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(4), 344-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 191-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elison, J. (2005). Shame and guilt: A hundred years of apples and oranges. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(1), 5-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2012). Beyond “empowerment”? Sexuality in a sexist world. Sex Roles, 66(11-12), 718-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, N., & Salmon, C. T. (2004). Guilt, fear, stigma and knowledge gaps: ethical issues in public health communication interventions. Bioethics, 18(6), 531-552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. P. (2004). Cultural views of the female breast. ABNF Journal, 15(1), 15-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2003). Affect, framing, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 54-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. P., & Solomon, P. J. (1975). Humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 4(3), 31-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, K. N., & Mattson, M. (2000). Breast self-examination pamphlets: A content analysis grounded in fear appeal research. Health Communication, 12(1), 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishen, A. S., & Bui, M. (2015). Fear advertisements: influencing consumers to make better health decisions. International Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 533-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeks, K. D., Hall, I. J., Johnson-Turbes, C. A., Kamalu, N., & Zavahir, Y. (2012). Formative Development of a Culturally Appropriate Mammography Screening Campaign for Low-Income African-American Women. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 5(3), 42-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, I. M., Watson, B., White, K. M., & Tay, R. (2007). Promoting public health messages: Should we move beyond fear-evoking appeals in road safety?. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 61-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maciejewski, J. J. (2004). Is the use of sexual and fear appeals ethical? A moral evaluation by Generation Y college students. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 97-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361-367.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, A. P., Schiro, J. L., & Fernbach, P. M. (2015). Not a problem: A downside of humorous appeals. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 1, 187-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500-510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M., Shoda, Y., & Hurley, K. (1996). Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: breast self-examination in cancer screening. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 70-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, B. (1992). Modesty, sexuality, and breast health in Chinese-American women. Western Journal of Medicine, 157(3), 260-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R. L. (2002). Discrete emotions and persuasion. In J. Price Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.). The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 289 - 308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabi, R. L. (2015). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31(7), 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2008). Do loss-framed persuasive messages engender greater message processing than do gain-framed messages? A meta-analytic review. Communication Studies, 59(1), 51-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, N. K. L., Voges, K. E., & Brown, M. R. (2004). The effect of provocation in the form of mild erotica on attitude to the ad and corporate image: Differences between cause-related and product-based advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, T., & Ramirez, A. (2000). Defining Sexually Oriented Appeals in Advertising: A Grounded Theory Investigation. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 27, 267-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, T., Heckler, S. E., & Jackson, S. (2001). The effects of sexual social marketing appeals on cognitive processing and persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain‐and loss‐framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S202-S220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. E. (1996). Framing in advertising and the moderating impact of consumer education. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 49-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viera, A. J. & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health education & behavior, 27(5), 591-615.

    Google Scholar 

  • World health Organization WHO (2015). Cancer. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/ _ (accessed 18.01.2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fanny V. Dobrenova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobrenova, F.V., Grabner-Kräuter, S., Diehl, S., Terlutter, R. (2017). Salient Appeals in Advertising Promoting Breast Self-Examination and Mammography Examination. In: Zabkar, V., Eisend, M. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research VIII. European Advertising Academy. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18731-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics