Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lösung des Vehicle Relocation Problem in Abhängigkeit charakteristischer Zielgrößen asymmetrischer Carsharing Systeme durch diskrete Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Produkte und Dienstleistungen in der Mobilität

Zusammenfassung

In vielen Großstädten und Ballungsräumen stellt Carsharing inzwischen eine verbreitete und nachhaltige Mobilitätsalternative dar. Durch Umstellung von symmetrischen auf asymmetrische Systeme, bei welchen Ausleih‐ und Rückgabeort nicht identisch sein müssen, kann die Attraktivität stationsbasierter Angebote weiter erhöht werden. Allerdings muss dann der Kumulation von Fahrzeugen an einzelnen Stationen durch effektive Organisation von Rückführungen entgegengewirkt werden. Eine Lösungsstrategie für das Vehicle Relocation Problem wird im Rahmen dieses Beitrages in Form diskreter Simulation beschrieben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • [1] Hadorn, W.: CarSharing in der Schweiz. Eine bewegte Erfolgsgeschichte, 1. Aufl. Pfäffikon 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • [2] Loose, W.: Wie alles anfing ‐ CarSharing als Reaktion auf Verkehrs‐ und Umweltsituation in den 90er Jahren. In: Ecological Economics (2014), S. 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • [3] Bundesverband CarSharing e.V.: Datenblatt CarSharing in Deutschland.

    Google Scholar 

  • [4] Shaheen, S. A.; Chan, N. D.; Micheaux, H.: One‐way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas. In: Transportation 42 (2015) 3, S. 519–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • [5] Correia, G. H. d. A.; Antunes, A. P.: Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one‐way carsharing systems. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 48 (2012) 1, S. 233–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • [6] Nair, R.; Miller‐Hooks, E.: Equilibrium network design of shared‐vehicle systems. In: European Journal of Operational Research 235 (2014) 1, S. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • [7] Luca, S. de; Di Pace, R.: Modelling users’ behaviour in inter‐urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach. In: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 71 (2015) 0, S. 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • [8] You, P.‐S.; Hsieh, Y.‐C.: A study on the vehicle size and transfer policy for car rental problems. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 64 (2014), S. 110–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • [9] Boyacı, B.; Zografos, K. G.; Geroliminis, N.: An optimization framework for the development of efficient one‐way car‐sharing systems. In: European Journal of Operational Research 240 (2015) 3, S. 718–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • [10] Nourinejad, M.; Zhu, S.; Bahrami, S.; Roorda, M. J.: Vehicle relocation and staff rebalancing in one‐way carsharing systems. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 81 (2015), S. 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • [11] Weikl, S.; Bogenberger, K.: A practice‐ready relocation model for free‐floating carsharing systems with electric vehicles – Mesoscopic approach and field trial results. In: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 57 (2015), S. 206–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • [12] Kek, Alvina G. H.; Cheu, R. L.; Meng, Q.; Fung, C. H.: A decision support system for vehicle relocation operations in carsharing systems. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 45 (2009) 1, S. 149–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • [13] Nourinejad, M.; Roorda, M. J.: A dynamic carsharing decision support system. In: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 66 (2014), S. 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • [14] Barth, M.; Todd, M.: Simulation model performance analysis of a multiple station shared vehicle system. In: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 7 (1999) 4, S. 237–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • [15] Barth, M.; Todd, M.; Xue, L.: User‐Based Vehicle Relocation Techniques for Multiple‐Station Shared‐Use Vehicle Systems. In: TRB 2004 Annual Meeting (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • [16] Alfian, G.; Rhee, J.; Yoon, B.: A simulation tool for prioritizing product‐service system (PSS) models in a carsharing service. In: Computers & Industrial Engineering 70 (2014), S. 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • [17] Wang, H.; Cheu, R.; Lee, D.‐H. (Hrsg.): Dynamic Relocating Vehicle Resources Using A Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model For Carsharing Services. Place of Publication: Los Alamitos, CA, USA, Huangshan, Anhui, China. Country of Publication: USA. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • [18] Waserhole, A.; Jost, V.; Brauner, N.: Pricing techniques for self regulation in Vehicle Sharing Systems. In: Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics 41 (2013) 0, S. 149–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • [19] Jorge, D.; Correia, G.: Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: a literature review. In: European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 13(3) (2013), S. 201–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • [20] Gavalas, D.; Konstantopoulos, C.; Pantziou, G.: Design and Management of Vehicle Sharing Systems: A Survey of Algorithmic Approaches. In: ArXiv e‐prints (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • [21] Fassi, A. E.; Awasthi, A.; Viviani, M.: Evaluation of carsharing network’s growth strategies through discrete event simulation. In: Expert Systems with Applications 39 (2012) 8, S. 6692–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • [22] Nair, R.; Miller‐Hooks, E.: Fleet Management for Vehicle Sharing Operations. In: Transportation Science 45 (2010) 4, S. 524–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • [23] Banks, J.: Discrete‐event system simulation, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • [24] Jorge, D.; Correia, G.; Barnhart, C.: Comparing Optimal Relocation Operations With Simulated Relocation Policies in One‐Way Carsharing Systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 15 (2014) 4, S. 1667–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • [25] Schreier, H.; Becker, U.; Heller, J.: Evaluation CarSharing (EVA‐CS)Landeshauptstadt München. Endbericht. Berlin 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • [26] Schmöller, S.; Weikl, S.; Müller, J.; Bogenberger, K.: Empirical analysis of free‐floating carsharing usage. The Munich and Berlin case. In: Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 56 (2015), S. 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • [27] civity Management Consultants GmbH & Co. KG: Urbane Mobilität im Umbruch? matters No.1 Verkehrliche und ökonomische Bedeutung des Free‐Floating‐Carsharing 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • [28] Nair, R.: Design and analysis of vehicle sharing programs: A systems approach, Dissertation 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • [29] Kelton, W. D.; Sadowski, R. P.; Sturrock, D. T.: Simulation with Arena, 4. ed., internat. ed. Boston 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • [30] Kleijnen, J. P.: Verification and validation of simulation models. In: European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 1, S. 145–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • [31] Le Vine, S.; Lee‐Gosselin, M.; Sivakumar, A.; Polak, J.: A new approach to predict the market and impacts of round‐trip and point‐to‐point carsharing systems. Case study of London. In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 32 (2014), S. 218–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • [32] Braun, A.; Hochschild, V.; Koch, A.: Intraregionale Unterschiede in der Carsharing‐Nachfrage: Eine GIS‐basierte empirische Analyse, IAW‐Diskussionspapiere, No. 99 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Industriebetriebslehre, Produktionswirtschaft und Logistik, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Schlossplatz 1, 09596, Freiberg, Deutschland

    S. Illgen & Prof. Dr. M. Höck

Authors
  1. S. Illgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. M. Höck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Illgen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Germany

    Heike Proff

  2. Universität Duisburg-Essen , Duisburg, Germany

    Thomas Martin Fojcik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Illgen, S., Höck, M. (2017). Lösung des Vehicle Relocation Problem in Abhängigkeit charakteristischer Zielgrößen asymmetrischer Carsharing Systeme durch diskrete Simulation. In: Proff, H., Fojcik, T. (eds) Innovative Produkte und Dienstleistungen in der Mobilität. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18613-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18613-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18612-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18613-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation