Advertisement

Spatial Transnationalism: An analytical approach

  • Sebastian KurtenbachEmail author
Chapter
  • 280 Downloads

Abstract

With the increase in intra-European mobility, formal nation-determined boundaries are in effect being replaced by boundaries determined by the actions of individuals. It has become normal for people who live in different European countries, or commute be-tween them, not to regard a national boundary as a means of defining or constraining them. Europeanization has an impact not only on nations’ economies, but also on individuals’ everyday lives in Euro-pean countries.

Keywords

International Migration Social Space Destination Country Arrival Area Transnational Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amelina, A. & Faist, T. (2012). De-naturalizing the national in research methodologies: key concepts of trans-national studies in migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(10), pp. 1707–1724.Google Scholar
  2. Barglowski, K., Łukasz K., & Paulina Ś. (2015). Caregiving in Polish–German TransnationalSocial Space: Circulating Narratives and Intersecting Heterogeneities. Population, Space and Place 21, pp. 257–269.Google Scholar
  3. Barham, B., & Stephen B. (1998). Migration, remittances, and inequality: estimating the net effects of migra-tion on income distribution. Journal of Development Economics 55, pp. 307–331.Google Scholar
  4. Benítez, J.L.(2012). Salvadoran Transnational Families: ICT and Communication Practices in the Network Society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38, pp. 1439–1449.Google Scholar
  5. Bernardi, L. (2011). A mixed-methods social networks study design for research on transnational families. Jour-nal of Marriage and Family 73, pp. 788–803.Google Scholar
  6. Bruneau, M. (2010). Diasporas, transnational spaces and communities. In Diaspora and Transnationalism. Con-cepts, Theories and Methods, Hrsg. Raineer Bauböck und Thomas Faist, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, E. W. (1925|1984). The Growth of the City. In The City – Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Enviroment, Hrsg. Robert E. Park und Ernest W. Burgess, Chicago/ London: The Uni-versity of Chicago Press, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
  8. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G. & Marije F. (2015). The Use of Online Media in Migration Networks. Population, Space and Place.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, D. M. (2005). A Paradigm of Transnationalism for Migration Studies. New Zealand Population Reviews 31, pp. 15–31.Google Scholar
  10. Erdal, M.B. (2012). A place to stay in Pakistan: Why migrants build houses in their country of origin. Popula-tion, Space and Place 18, pp. 629–641.Google Scholar
  11. Faist, T. (1998). Transnational social spaces out of international migration: evolution, significance and future prospects. European Journal of Sociology 39, pp. 213-247.Google Scholar
  12. Faist, T. (2000). The Bridging Function of Social Capital: Transnational Social Spaces. In The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 195–241.Google Scholar
  13. Fokkema, T., Cela, E. & Ambrosetti, E. (2013). Giving from the Heart or from the Ego? Motives behind Re-mittances of the Second Generation in Europe. International Migration Review 47, pp. 539–572.Google Scholar
  14. Glick Schiller, N. (2012). Transnationality, Migrants and Cities: A Comparative Approach in Beyond Methodo-logical Transnationalism. Research Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies, Hrsg. Anna Amelina, Devrimsel D. NErgiz, Thomas Faist, und Nina Glick Schiller, New York City: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
  15. Glick Schiller, N. & Fouron, G.E. (1999). Terrains of blood and nation: Haitian transnational social fields. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22 (2), pp. 340-366.Google Scholar
  16. Gowricharn, R. (2009). Changing forms of transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32 (9), pp. 1619–1638.Google Scholar
  17. Guarnizo, L.E. & Smith, M.P. (1998). The Locations of Transnationalism. In Transnationalism from Below,. Luis Eduardo Guarnizo und Michael Peter Smith (eds.), New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  18. Ives, N., Jill H., Walsh, C.A. & Este, D. (2014). Transnational elements of newcomer women’s housing inse-curity: remittances and social networks. Transnational Social Review 4 (2-3), pp. 152–167.Google Scholar
  19. Landry, R. & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), pp. 23–49.Google Scholar
  20. Levitt, P. (2001). The Transnational Villager. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levitt, P. & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). A Transnational Social Field. International Migration Review 38 (3), pp. 1002–1039.Google Scholar
  22. Mexican Migration Project. (2016). http://mmp.opr.princeton.edu/home-en.aspx; last seen: 02/26/2016.
  23. Morales, L. & Pilati, K. (2014). The political transnationalism of Ecuadorians in Barcelona, Madrid and Milan: The role of individual resources, organizational engagement and the political context. Global Networks 14 (1), pp. 80–102.Google Scholar
  24. Organ, C. (2001). Communication and Identity. Turkish Migrants in Amsterdam and Their Use of Media. Lan-ham/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  25. Park, K. (2007). Constructing transnational identities without leaving home: Korean immigrant women’s cogni-tive border-crossing. Sociological Forum 22, pp. 200–218.Google Scholar
  26. Pfau, W.D., & Thanh Giang, L. (2009). Determinants and impacts of international remittances on household welfare in Vietnam. International social science journal 60, pp. 431–43.Google Scholar
  27. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E. & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (2), pp. 217–237.Google Scholar
  28. Pries, L. (2001a). New Transnational Social Spaces. In New Transnational Social Spaces. International migra-tion and transnational companies in the early twenty-first century, Ludger Pries (eds.), New York City: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 3–36.Google Scholar
  29. Pries, L. (2001b). The disruption of social and geographical space. International Sociology 16 (1), pp. 55–74.Google Scholar
  30. Pries, Ludger 2004. Determining the Causes and Durability of Transnational Labour Migration between Mexico and the United States: Some Empirical Findings. International Migration 42(2), 3–39.Google Scholar
  31. Pries, L. & Seeliger, M. (2012). Transnational Social Spaces: Between Methodological Nationalism and Cos-mo-Globalism. In Beyond Methodological Transnationalism. Resarch Methodologies for Cross-Border Studies, Hrsg. Anna Amelia, Cevrimsel D. Nergiz, Thomas Faist, und Nina Glick Schiller, New York City: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar
  32. Riain, R. & King, C. (2015). Emotional streaming and transconnectivity: Skype and emotion practices in transnational families in Ireland. Global Networks 15 (2), pp. 256–273.Google Scholar
  33. Riedel, S. (2016). The Problems of Assessing Transnational Mobility: Identifying Latent Groups of Immigrants in Germany Using Factor Mixture Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 53(9), pp. 1689–1699.Google Scholar
  34. Riedel, S. (2015). The Interrelation of Immigrants’ Interethnic Ties and Socioeconomic Status in Germany. An Autoregressive Panel Analysis. European Journal of Population, 31(3), pp. 287–307.Google Scholar
  35. Schimmer, P. & van Tubergen, F. (2014). Transnationalism and Ethnic Identification among Adolescent Chil-dren of Immigrants in the Netherlands, Germany, England, and Sweden. International Migration Review 48(3), pp. 680–709.Google Scholar
  36. Schunck, R. (2011). Immigrant Integration, Transnational Activities and the Life Course, In: Wingens, Matthi-as, Windzio, Michael, Valk, Helga de & Aybek, Can (Eds..): A Life-Course Perspective on Migration and Inte-gration: Springer Netherlands, pp. 259–282.Google Scholar
  37. Slater, T. & Anderson, N. (2011). The reputational ghetto: Territorial stigmatisation in St Paul’s, Bristol. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(4), pp. 530–546.Google Scholar
  38. Tintori, G. (2011). The Transnational Political Practices of ‘‘Latin American Italians’’. International Migration 49 (3), pp. 168–188.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, D. (2011). Migrant Remittances. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3), pp. 129–152.Google Scholar
  40. Vertovec, S. (2006). The Emergence of Super-Diversity in Britain. Working Pa. Oxford: University of Oxford; Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.Google Scholar
  41. Waldinger, R. (2013). Immigrant transnationalism. Current Sociology 61 (5-6), pp. 756–777.Google Scholar
  42. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wacquant, L. (2007). Territorial stigmatization in the age of advanced marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91 (1), pp. 66–77.Google Scholar
  44. Wijers, G D.M. (2014). Navigating a river by its bends: A study on transnational social networks as resources for the transformation of Cambodia. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (9), pp. 1526–1545.Google Scholar
  45. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, mi-gration and the social sciences. Global Networks 2 (4), pp. 301–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum für interdisziplinäre RegionalforschungRuhr-Universität BochumBochumDeutschland

Personalised recommendations