Advertisement

Growing up in a disadvantaged neighborhood

Preventing neighborhood effects and promoting positive youth development through sports using the example Plovdiv-Stolipinovo
  • Ina SchäferEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The immigration of the Romani people is at the center of attention in the European media since Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU in 2007, strengthened since the freedom of movement for workers in 2014. Media reporting on the socalled “poverty migration” is mostly negative and includes stereotypes that impair the people’s needs.

Keywords

Social Work Role Model Delinquent Behavior Neighborhood Effect Sport Club 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  2. Benz, W. (2014). „Antiziganismus ist salonfähig.“ Gespräch mit Romani Rose, Vorsitzender des Zentralrats Deutscher Sinti und Roma. [Antiziganism is acceptable. Interview with Romani Rose, chairman of the central council of german Sinti and Roma], in Benz, Wolfgang (ed.) Die unerwünschte Minderheit. Über das Vorurteil Antiziganismus. [Sinti and Roma. The undesirable minority. About the prejudice antiziganism], Berlin: Metropol Verlag, pp. 49-63.Google Scholar
  3. Brearley, M. (2001). The Persecution of Gypsies in Europe. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(4), 588–599.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, X.S. (2007). More Pluribus, Less Unum? The changing geography of race and opportunity, in Beider, Harris (ed.) Neighborhood Renewal & Housing Markets: Community Engagement in the US & UK. Oxford UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 63-86.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1981). Ökologische Sozialisationsforschung. Konzepte der Humanwissenschaften. [The Ecology of Human Development. Experiments by Nature and Design], Harvard: Harvard College.Google Scholar
  6. Castañeda, H. (2014). European Mobilities or Poverty Migration? Discourses on Roma in Germany. International Migration, n/a–n/a.Google Scholar
  7. Crane, Jonathan (1991). The Epidemic Theory of Ghettos and Neighborhood Effects on Dropping Out and Teenage Childbearing. The American Journal of Sociology. 96(5), pp. 1226-1259.Google Scholar
  8. Du Bois-Reymond, M. (2000). Jugendkulturelles Kapital in Wissensgesellschaften. [Youthcultural capital in knowledge-based society], in Krüger Heinz Hermann, Wenzel Hartmut (ed.) Schule zwischen Effektivität und sozialer Verantwortung. [School between efectiveness and social responsibility], Opladen: Leske und Budric,. Pp. 235-254.Google Scholar
  9. End, M. (2011). Sinti und Roma. Bilder und Sinnstruktur des Antiziganismus. [Sinti and Roma. Images and meaning structures], APUZ 22-23.Google Scholar
  10. Friedrichs, J. (2011). Ist die Besonderheit des Städtischen auch die Besonderheit der Stadtsoziologie? [Is the special of the urban the special of the citysociology, too? The special of the urban], in Herrmann, Heike u.a. (ed.) Die Besonderheit des Städtischen. [The special of the urban], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 34-47.Google Scholar
  11. Friedrichs, J. & Nonnenmacher, A. (2010). Welche Mechanismen erklären Kontexteffekte? [Which mechanisms explain neighborhood effects?], in Becker, Tilo, Birkelbach, Klaus, Hagenah, Jörg, Rosar, Ulrich (eds.) Komperative empirische Sozialforschung.[comperative empirical social research], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 469-497.Google Scholar
  12. Friedrichs, J. & Triemer, S. (2008). Gespaltene Städte? Soziale und ethnische Segregation in deutschen Großstädten. [Divided cities. Social and ethnical segregation in german large cities], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  13. Friedrichs, J. & Blasius, J. (2000). Leben in benachteiligten Wohngebieten. [Living in disadvantaged residential districts], Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
  14. German Association of cities (2013). Positionspapier des Deutschen Städtetages zu den Fragen der Zuwanderung aus Rumänien und Bulgarien. [Position paper of the German Association of cities to the questions of the immigration from Romania and Bulgaria], Deutscher Städtetag: Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. Gerull, S. (2011). Armut und Ausgrenzung im Kontext Sozialer Arbeit. [Poverty and exclusion in the context of social work], Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  16. Gläser, J. & Laudel, G. (2009). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. [Expert interviews and qualitatative content analysis]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  17. Goodwin, M. (2009). Multi-dimensional exclusion: viewing Romani marginalization through the nexus of race and poverty. In: Schiek, Dagmar, Chege, Victoria (eds) European Union Non-Discrimination Law. Comperative Perspectives on Multi-dimensional Equality Law. Oxford: Routlege.Google Scholar
  18. Groh-Samberg, O. (2009). Armut, Ausgrenzung und Klassenstruktur. Zur Integration multidimensionaler und längsschnittlicher Alternativen. [Poverty, Exclusion and class structure. The integration of multidimensional and longitudinal options], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. Harding, D. J. (2009) Violence, older peers, and the socialization of adolescent boys in disadvantaged neighborhoods”. American Sociological Review, 74(3), pp. 445-464.Google Scholar
  20. Häußermann, H. & Siebel, W. (2004). Stadtsoziologie. Eine Einführung. [Urban sociology. An Introduction] Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Kanev, K. (1996). Dynamics of Inter-Ethnic Tensions in Bulgaria and the Balkans. “Occasional Papers on religion in Eastern Europe”, 16(6), 12-45.Google Scholar
  22. Kolb, B. (2008). Involving, Sharing, Analyzing – Potential of the Participatory Photo Interview. In: Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 9(3), Art. 12.Google Scholar
  23. Kronauer, M. (2008). Ausgrenzung und physich-sozialer Raum. [Exklusion and physical-social space], in Anhorn, Roland, Bettinger, Frank, Stehr, Johannes (eds.) Sozialer Ausschluss und Soziale Arbeit. Positionsbestimmung einer kritischen Theorie und Praxis der Sozialen Arbeit. 2., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. [Social exclusion and social work. Position statements from a critical theory and practice of social work.], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 181-198.Google Scholar
  24. Kurtenbach, S. Schäfer, I. (2016). Möglichkeiten zur Prävention von Kontexteffekten im Jugendalter durch Soziale Arbeit am Beispiel einer Roma Siedlung [Possibilites for prevention of neighborhood effects of juveniles by social work at the example of a roma neighborhood.]. Soziale Passagen, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
  25. Leiserowitz, R. (2010). Die unbekannten Nachbarn. Minderheiten in Osteuropa. [The unknown neighbors. Minoritys in East-Europe], Ch. Links Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Lüdemann, C. (2000). Normen, Sanktionen und soziale Kontrolle in der Theorie rationalen Handelns von James S. Coleman. [Norms, sanctions and social control in the rational-choice-theory of James S. Coleman], in Peters, Helge (ed.)Soziale Kontrolle. Zum Problem der Normkonformität in der Gesellschaft [Social control. The problem of non-confornism in the society], Opladen: Leske und Budrich, pp. 87 – 110.Google Scholar
  27. Marushiakova, E. & Popov, V. (1997). Gypsies (Roma) in Bulgaria. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Marushiakova, E., & Popov, V. (2013). The Shades of Incomplete: Roma Educational Policy in Bulgaria. In: Miskovic, Maja, ed. Roma Education in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Matter, M. (2015). Nirgendwo erwünscht. Zur Armutsmigration aus Zentral- und Südosteuropa in die Länder der EU-15 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Angehörigen der Roma-Minderheiten. [Nowhere welcome. To the poverty migration from central- and easteurope in the countrys of t he EU-15 under special consideration of persons of the Roma-minority], Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. O’Nions, H. (2010). Different and unequal: the educational segregation of Roma pupils in Europe. Intercultural Education, 21(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  31. Oberwittler, D. (2004). Soziologie der Kriminalität. [sociology of delinquency], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  32. Pries, L. (2010). Transnationalisierung. Theorie und Empirie grenzüberschreitender Vergesellschaftung. [Transnationalisation. Theory and empirie of bordercrossing socialisation], Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  33. Pries, L. & Kurtenbach, S. (2016). Transnationalisierung als strukturierendes Element des Sozialraums. [Transnationalisation as structuring element of the social space], in Kessl, Frank./Reutlinger, Christian (eds.) Handbuch Sozialraum. Grundlagen für den Bildungsund Sozialbereich. [handbook social space. Foundations for the education and social fields] Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  34. Reutlinger, C. (2008). Raum und soziale Entwicklung. Kritische Reflexion und neue Perspektiven für den sozialpädagogischen Diskurs. [Space and social development Critical reflections and new perspectives for the socio-pedagogical discourse] Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  35. Ringold, D., Orenstein, M. A. & Wilkens, E. (2005). Roma in an Expanding Europe. Breaking the poverty cycle. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Sampson, R. J. & Raudenbush, S. W. & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhood and Violent Crime: A multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy. Science, 277 (5328); pp. 918-924.Google Scholar
  37. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital. Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children. American Sociological review, 64, pp. 633-660.Google Scholar
  38. Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 5(4), pp. 863-891.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, W.J. (1989). The Truly Disadvantaged – The Inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Empirische BildungsforschungUniversität KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations