Genre Modulation as Sectional Divider

Part of the Systematische Musikwissenschaft book series (SYMU)


Recent scholarship on popular music has emphasized the importance of sectionality, analyzing formal, metrical, tonal, and timbral contrasts between the sections of songs. While these approaches have yielded considerable insight into structural compositional techniques, such focused and disparate approaches invite the ques-tion of overarching stylistic or generic contrasts within songs. Genre modulation—the practice by which a number of musical parameters within a song may signal a change in genre—can be perceived in much popular music since 1950, and may be an important factor in perceptions of sectionality within popular music.

In this paper, I argue that analysis of genre modulations within songs may lead to a more comprehensive understanding of sectionality in popular music. Through examples from the Beatles and Taylor Swift, I show how genre modulations may be identified through a variety of musical parameters, and discuss how these genre modulations effectively create contrast between the sections of a song. These analyses challenge the convention of classifying songs by genre, suggesting instead that there may be considerable fluidity of genre within a single song, and that artists may consciously exploit genre modulation when seeking distinctive sectionality in their songs.


Genre Style Modulation Beatles Taylor Swift 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



  1. Biamonte, N. 2014. Formal Functions of Metric Dissonance in Rock Music Music Theory Online 20(2).Google Scholar
  2. Brackett, D. 2002. “(In Search of) musical meaning: genres, categories and crossover” In David Hesmondhalgh and Keith Negus ed. Popular Music Studies New York: Oxford University Press 65-83.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, L. 2005. “Meaning in a Popular Song: The Representation of Masochistic Desire in Sarah McLachlan’s ‘Ice.’” In Deborah Stein ed. Engaging Music: Essays in Music Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press 136-48.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, L. 2014. Sculpting a Vocal Narrative across the Concept Album: Vocal Delivery and Treatment in P!nk’s The Truth About Love. Society for Music Theory Conference, Milwaukee WI Nov 7, 2014.Google Scholar
  5. Capuzzo, G. 2009. Sectional Tonality and Sectional Centricity in Rock Music Music Theory Spectrum 31(1): 157-174.Google Scholar
  6. de Clercq, T. 2012. Sections and Successions in Successful Songs: A Prototype Approach to Form in Rock Music Ph.D. Eastman School of Music, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Doll, C. 2011. Rockin’ Out: Expressive Modulation in Verse-Chorus Form Music Theory Online 17(3).Google Scholar
  8. Fabbri, F. 1981. “A Theory of Musical Genres: Two Applications” from Popular Music Perspectives ed. D. Horn and P. Tagg; Göteborg and Exeter: International Association for the Study of Popular Music p. 52-81.Google Scholar
  9. Holt, F. 2007. Genre In Popular Music. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Tagg, P. 1992. “Towards a Sign Typology of Music” In R. Dalmonte and M. Baroni ed. Secondo Convegno Europeo di Analisi Musicale. Trento: Università degli studi di Trento. 369-378.Google Scholar


  1. Beatles, the. 1967. “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds.” Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. Parlophone Records, 1 June, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Swift, T. 2012. “I Knew You Were Trouble” Red. Big Machine Records, 22 October, United States.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Music TheoryRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUnited States of America

Personalised recommendations