Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sozialunternehmertum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Innovationsforschung

  • 10k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Sozialunternehmertum bezieht sich auf die innovative Nutzung wie Kombination von Ressourcen zur Bewältigung sozialer Probleme und Bedürfnisse. Wir zeichnen Debatten um die Definition von Sozialunternehmertum nach und stellen institutionellen Wandel und die Verfolgung vielfältiger Ziele als Schlüsselmerkmale von Sozialunternehmertum heraus. Auf Basis einer Diskussion verschiedener Arbeiten der Management-, Organisations- und Unternehmertumsforschung eröffnen wir eine prägnante und generative Perspektive auf Sozialunternehmertum. Sie soll helfen, die Erforschung sozialer Innovationen voran zu treiben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wir verwenden die Begriffe Sozialunternehmertum und Sozialunternehmen hier synonym.

Literatur

  • Anheier, Helmut K., und Gorgi Krlev. 2014. Welfare regimes, policy reforms, and hybridity. American Behavioral Scientist 58(11): 1395–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ault, Joshua K., und Andrew Spicer. 2014. The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross-national variation in commercial microfinance lending. Strategic Management Journal 35(12): 1818–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Ted, und Reed E. Nelson. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, Marya L. Besharov, und Bjoern Mitzinneck. 2017. On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Thomas B. Lawrence und Renate Meyer, 2. Aufl., 128–162. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, und Silvia Dorado. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, und Matthew Lee. 2014. Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, Metin Sengul, Anne-Claire Pache, und Jacob Model. 2015. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal 58(6): 1658–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter. 1974. On the nature of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter, und W. Richard Scott. 1962. Formal organizations: A comparative approach. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Emily S., und Matthew S. Kraatz. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin und Roy Suddaby, 1. Aufl., 243–275. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1971. Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems 18(3): 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, und Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brakman Reiser, Dana. 2013. Theorizing forms for social enterprise. Emory Law Journal 62(4): 681–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brès, Luc, Emmanuel Raufflet, und Johnny Boghossian. 2018. Pluralism in organizations: Learning from unconventional forms of organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews 20(2): 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certo, S. Trevis, und Toyah Miller. 2008. Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts. Business Horizons 51(4): 267–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Nia, und Satyajit Majumdar. 2014. Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing 29(3): 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, J. Adam, Taylor Wry, und Eric Y. Zhao. 2016. Funding financial inclusion: Institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 59(6): 2103–2131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crucke, Saskia, und Mirjam Knockaert. 2016. When stakeholder representation leads to faultlines. A study of board service performance in social enterprises. Journal of Management Studies 53(5): 768–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacin, Peter A., M. Tina Dacin, und Margaret Matear. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Why we don't need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives 24(3): 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Gerald F. 2016. Can an economy survive without corporations? Technology and robust organizational alternatives. Academy of Management Perspectives 30(2): 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, Anne, und Simon Teasdale. 2019. A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. Gregory. 2001. The meaning of „social entrepreneurship“. Duke University innovation and entrepreneurship“ initiative working paper. https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship. Zugegriffen am 13.06.2017.

  • Defourny, Jacques. 2001. Introduction. From third sector to social enterprise. In The emergence of social enterprise, Hrsg. Carlo Borzaga und Jacques Defourny, 1–29. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, Jacques, und Marthe Nyssens. 2010. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1(1): 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desa, Geoffrey. 2012. Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36(4): 727–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico, MariaLaura, Helen Haugh, und Paul Tracey. 2010. Social bricolage: theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34(4): 681–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorado, Silvia. 2006. Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creation, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship 11(4): 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, Sunasir. 2019. Seeing parochially and acting locally: Social exposure, problem identification and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 34(6): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, Alnoor, Julie Battilana, und Johanna Mair. 2014. The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 34:81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, Alnoor, und V. Kasturi Rangan. 2014. What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review 56(3): 118–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, Roger, und Robert Alford. 1991. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Hrsg. Walter W. Powell und Paul J. Dimaggio, 232–263. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohs, Stephan, Katrin Schneiders, und Rolf G. Heinze. 2017. Outsiders and intrapreneurs: The institutional embeddedness of social entrepreneurship in Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28(6): 2569–2591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervieux, Chantal, und Annika Voltan. 2018. Framing social problems in social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 151(21): 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, Stephen, und Charles L. Bosk. 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howaldt, Jürgen, und Michael Schwarz. 2010. Soziale innovation – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder und -perspektiven. In Soziale innovation: Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma, Hrsg. Jürgen Howaldt und Heike Jacobsen, 87–108. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, Michael, Hubert Knoblauch, Werner Rammert, und Arnold Windeler. 2015. Innovation society today. The reflexive creation of novelty. Historical Social Research /Historische Sozialforschung 40(3): 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysentruyt, Marieke, Johanna Mair, Ute Stephan. 2016. Market-oriented and mission-focused: Social enterprises around the globe. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/market_oriented_and_mission_focused_social_enterprises_around_the_globe. Zugegriffen am 11.08.2020.

  • Kerlin, Janelle A. 2006. Social enterprise in the United States and europe: Understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 17(3): 246–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, Matthew S., und Edward J. Zajac. 1996. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review 61(5): 812–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B., Graham Dover, und Bryan Gallagher. 2014. Managing social innovation. In The Oxford handbook of innovation management, Hrsg. Mark Dodgson, David M. Gann und Nelson Phillips, 316–334. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, Michael, und Mary Ann Glynn. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 545–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna. 2010. Social entrepreneurship: Taking stock and looking ahead. In Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship, Hrsg. Alain Fayolle und Harry Matlay, 15–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna. 2018. Scaling innovative ideas to create inclusive labour markets. Nature Human Behaviour 2(12): 884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, und Ignasi Martí. 2006. Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business 41(1): 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, und Ignasi Martí. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, Julie Battilana, und Julian Cardenas. 2012a. Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics 111(3): 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, Ignasi Martí, und Marc J. Ventresca. 2012b. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal 55(4): 819–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, und Lisa Hehenberger. 2014. Front-stage and backstage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal 57(4): 1174–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, Judith Mayer, und Eva Lutz. 2015. Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies 36(6): 713–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, Miriam Wolf, und Christian Seelos. 2016. Scaffolding: A process of transforming patterns of inequality in small-scale societies. Academy of Management Journal 59(6): 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna, und Nikolas Rathert. 2019a. Alternative organizing with social purpose: Revisiting institutional analysis of market-based activity. Socio-Economic Review: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwz031.

  • Mair, Johanna, und Nikolas Rathert. 2019b. Social entrepreneurship: Prospects for the study of market-based activity and social change. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives, Hrsg. Abagail McWilliams, Deborah E. Rupp, Donald S. Siegel, Günter K. Stahl und David A. Waldman, 359–373. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna. 2020. Research on social entrepreneurship as disciplined exploration. In The nonprofit sector: A research handbook, Hrsg. Walter W. Powell und Patricia Bromley, 3. Aufl. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKague, Kevin, Charlene Zietsma, und Christine Oliver. 2015. Building the social structure of a market. Organization Studies 36(8): 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micelotta, Evelyn, Michael Lounsbury, und Royston Greenwood. 2017. Pathways of institutional change. Journal of Management 43(6): 1885–1910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molecke, Greg, und Jonatan Pinkse. 2017. Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing 32(5): 550–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, Alex. 2010. Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: Reporting and disclosure by community interest companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35(4): 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, Anne-Claire, und Filipe Santos. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review 35(3): 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, Anne-Claire, und Filipe Santos. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal 56(4): 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch, und Michael Hutter. 2016. Die Ausweitung der Innovationszone. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 3–14. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, Christian, und Johanna Mair. 2005. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Business Horizons 48(3): 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, Christian, und Johanna Mair. 2007. Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives 21(4): 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, Christian, und Johanna Mair. 2014. Organizational closure competencies and scaling: A realist approach to theorizing social enterprise. Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods 9:147–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seelos, Christian, und Johanna Mair. 2017. Innovation and scaling for impact: How effective social enterprises do it. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seibel, Wolfgang. 2015. Welfare mixes and hybridity: Analytical and managerial implications. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26(5): 1759–1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, Jeremy C., Todd W. Moss, und G. T. Lumpkin. 2009. Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 3(2): 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Wendy K., und Marya L. Besharov. 2019. Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Administrative Science Quarterly 64(1): 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, Roger, Chris Cornforth, und Mike Aiken. 2009. The governance challenges of social enterprises: Evidence from a UK empirical study. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80(2): 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Ute, und Andreana Drencheva. 2017. The person in social entrepreneurship: A systematic review of research on the social entrepreneurial personality. In The Wiley handbook of entrepreneurship, Hrsg. Gorkan Ahmetoglu, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Bailey Klinger und Tessa Karcisky, 205–229. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Ute, Malcolm Patterson, Ciara Kelly, und Johanna Mair. 2016. Organizations driving positive social change: A review and an integrative framework of change processes. Journal of Management 42(5): 1250–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, Ute, Lorraine M. Uhlaner, und Christopher Stride. 2015. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations. Journal of International Business Studies 46(3): 308–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, Simon. 2011. What’s in a name? Making sense of social Enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration 27(2): 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, Paul, Nelson Phillips, und Owen Jarvis. 2011. Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science 22(1): 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, Paul, und Neil Stott. 2017. Social innovation: A window on alternative ways of organizing and innovating. Innovation. Organization & Management 19(1): 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2016. Old problems, new solutions: Measuring the capacity for social innovation across the world. https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/Social_Innovation_Index.pdf. Zugegriffen am 18.02.2018.

  • Waldron, Theodore L., Greg Fisher, und Michael Pfarrer. 2016. How social entrepreneurs facilitate the adoption of new industry practices. Journal of Management Studies 53(5): 821–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wry, Tyler, und Jeffrey G. York. 2017. An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Academy of Management Review 42(3): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, Wolfgang. 1989. Über soziale Innovationen. Soziale Welt 40(1): 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Eric Yanfei, und Michael Lounsbury. 2016. An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations. Journal of Business Venturing 31(6): 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Eric Yanfei, und Tyler Wry. 2016. Not all inequality is equal: Decomposing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Academy of Management Journal 59(6): 1994–2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Organization, Strategy and Leadership, Hertie School, Berlin, Deutschland

    Johanna Mair

  2. Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society, Stanford University, Stanford, Vereinigte Staaten

    Johanna Mair

  3. Department of Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Niederlande

    Nikolas Rathert

Authors
  1. Johanna Mair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikolas Rathert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Mair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mair, J., Rathert, N. (2021). Sozialunternehmertum. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17668-6_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17668-6_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17667-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17668-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation