Advertisement

Elites and Corruption in European Democracies

  • Ina Kubbe
Chapter
Part of the Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft book series (VGPO)

Abstract

Democracy does not guarantee clean and transparent governance at all and data shows that democratic systems are still fighting corruption, even in the European Union that is oft en seen as free of corruption. Yet, frequent scandals illustrate that corruption is a serious problem in nearly all European Union states and that Europe’s citizens are very concerned about the situation. The majority is highly dissatisfied with the way governments are tackling the corruption risk. Thus, it appears that the disparity between the demands of the citizens and actions of their political leaders requires further research and raises the following question: What are the challenges for the political elite to fight corruption in Europe? Based on qualitative and quantitative secondary data on assessments of corruption, the paper demonstrates that a strong political leadership is essential in anti-corruption policy design and implementation of regulatory governance reforms. It highlights how important transparent, accountable and responsible actions of political leaders are for the reduction of corruption and the building of citizen’s trust in politics. The article shows that the application of anti-corruption principles and regulations depends greatly on the choices made by politicians and top managers of the ministries and regulatory agencies.

Keywords

Political Party Public Official Political Leader Political Elite Veto Player 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarts, K., A. Blais, and H. Schmitt. 2011. Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abed, G. T., S. Gupta, and International Monetary Fund (Eds.). 2002. Governance, Corruption & Economic Performance. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, D., and J. A. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  4. Adsera, A. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2), 445-490.Google Scholar
  5. Andrews, J. T., and G. R. Montinola. 2004. “Veto Players and the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 37(1), 55-87.Google Scholar
  6. Argandoña, A. 2003. Political Party Funding and Business Corruption. In Wieland, J. (Ed.), Standards and Audits for Ethics Management Systems, 163-190. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  7. Bågenholm, A., and N. Charron. 2015. Anti-Corruption Parties and Good Government. In Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 263-282. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Banuri, S., and C. Eckel. 2012. Experiments in Culture and Corruption. A Review. In Serra, D., and L. Wantchekon (Eds.), New Advances in Experimental Research on Corruption, Research in Experimental Economics Vol. 15, 51-76. Bingly: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  9. Barr, A., and D. Serra. 2010. “Corruption and Culture: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 94(11-12), 862-869.Google Scholar
  10. BBC. 2014. Corruption across EU ‘breathtaking’ – EU Commission, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26014387. Accessed: 27 October 2016.
  11. Broscheid, A., and D. Coen. 2007. “Lobbying Activity and Fora Creation in the EU: Empirically Exploring the Nature of the Policy Good.” Journal of European Public Policy 14(3), 346-365.Google Scholar
  12. Bueno de Mesquita, B. (Ed.). 2005. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bull, B., and M. Aguilar-Støen. 2016. Changing Elites, Institutions and Environmental Governance. In de Castro, F., B. Hogenboom, and M. Baud (Eds.), Environmental Governance in Latin America, 137-163. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Campos, N. F., and F. Giovannoni. 2007. “Lobbying, Corruption and Political Influence.” Public Choice 131(1-2), 1-21.Google Scholar
  15. Charron, N. 2016. “Do Corruption Measures Have a Perception Problem? Assessing the Relationship Between Experiences and Perceptions of Corruption Among Citizens and Experts.” European Political Science Review 8(1), 147-171.Google Scholar
  16. Cimoli, M., and S. Rovira. 2008. “Elites and Structural Inertia in Latin America: An Introductory Note on the Political Economy of Development.” Journal of Economic Issues 42(2), 327-347.Google Scholar
  17. Collier, M. 2002. “Explaining Corruption. An Institutional Choice Approach.” Crime Law & Social Change 38(1), 1-32.Google Scholar
  18. Council of Europe Parliamentary Resolution 1636. 2008. Indicators for media in democracy. http://www.europeanrights.eu/public/atti/1636_ing.htm. Accessed: 05 January 2017.
  19. Council of Europe. 2013. Parliamentary Assembly. http://assembly.coe.int/ASP/NewsManager/EMB_NewsManagerView.asp?ID=8329&L=2. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  20. Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2012. Weberian Bureaucracy and Corruption Prevention. In Holmberg, S., and B. Rothstein (Eds.), Good Government, 150-173. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2015. Democratic and Professional Accountability. In Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 149-166. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Dahlström, C., V. Lapuente, and J. Teorell. 2012. “The Merit of Meritocratization: Politics, Bureaucracy, and the Institutional Deterrents of Corruption.” Political Research Quarterly 65(3), 656-668.Google Scholar
  23. Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud. 2015. Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Dur, A. 2008. “Measuring Interest Group Influence in the EU: A Note on Methodology.” European Union Politics 9(4), 559-576.Google Scholar
  25. Elster, J. 2000. Social Norms and Economic Theory. In Crothers, L., and C. Lockhart (Eds.), Culture and Politics, 363-380. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. EUobserver. 2016. Corruption Costs EU €71bn a Year. https://euobserver.com/justice/132784. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  27. European Commission. 2013. Special Eurobarometer 2013. Corruption. TNS Opinion & Social. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_397_en.pdf. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  28. European Commission. 2014. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/e-library/documents/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/docs/acr_2014_en.pdf. Accessed: 04 January 2017.
  29. European Parliament. 2016. The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Organised Crime and Corruption. Annex II – Corruption. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579319/EPRS_STU%282016%29579319_EN.pdf. Accessed: 04 January 2017.
  30. Fjelde, H., and H. Hegre. 2014. “Political Corruption and Institutional Stability.” Studies in Comparative International Development 49(3), 267-299.Google Scholar
  31. Fukuyama, F. (2014). States and Democracy. Democratization, 21(7), 1326-1340.Google Scholar
  32. Gamir, A. F. 2015. Mapping High-Level Corruption Risks in Spanish Public Procurement. http://www.crcb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Gamir_Corruption-in-Spanish-PP_v2_2015Feb.pdf. Accessed: 28 November 2016.
  33. Hale, H. E. 2015. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harrison, L. E., and S. P. Huntington. 2001. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Hauk, E., and M. Saez-Marti. 2002. “On the Cultural Transmission of Corruption.” Journal of Economic Theory 107(2), 311-335.Google Scholar
  36. Heller, W. B., A. P. Kyriacou, and O. Roca-Sagalés. 2016. “Institutional Checks and Corruption: The Effect of Formal Agenda Access on Governance.” European Journal of Political Research 55(4), 681-701.Google Scholar
  37. Holmberg, S., and B. Rothstein. 2015. Good Societies Need Good Leaders on a Leash. In Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 13-32. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Holmes, L. 2006. Rotten States? Corruption, Post-Communism, and Neoliberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Johnston, M. 2012. “Corruption Control in the United States: Law, Values, and the Political Foundations of Reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(2), 329-345.Google Scholar
  40. Johnston, M. 2014. Corruption, Contention and Reform: The Power of Deep Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kalenborn, C., and C. Lessmann. 2013. “The Impact of Democracy and Press Freedom on Corruption: Conditionality Matters.” Journal of Policy Modeling 35(6), 857-886.Google Scholar
  42. Kasemets, A. 2012. The Long Transition to Good Governance: The Case of Estonia. Looking at the Changes in the Governance Regime and Anti-Corruption Policy. Working Paper no. 32. European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building. http://www.againstcorruption.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/WP-32-Long-Transition-Estonia1.pdf. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  43. Klitgaard, R. 2009. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Klüver, H. 2013. Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kolstad, I., and A. Wiig. 2016. “Does Democracy Reduce Corruption?” Democratization 23(7), 1198-1215.Google Scholar
  46. Kubbe, I. 2014. Corruption and Trust: A Model Design. In Debiel, T., and A. Gawrich (Eds.), (Dys-)Functionalities of Corruption, 117-135. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Kubbe, I. 2015. Corruption in Europe: Is It All About Democracy? Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  48. Kunicová, J., and S. Rose-Ackerman. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4), 573-606.Google Scholar
  49. La Porta, R. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15(1), 222-279.Google Scholar
  50. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” Journal of Economic Literature 46(2), 285-332.Google Scholar
  51. LobbyFacts. 2016. Lobbying. https://lobbyfacts.eu/. Accessed: 04 January 2017.
  52. Lobo, M., and J. Curtice (Eds.). 2015. Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Manzetti, L., and C. J. Wilson. 2007. “Why Do Corrupt Governments Maintain Public Support?” Comparative Political Studies 40(8), 949-970.Google Scholar
  54. Mohtadi, H., and T. L. Roe. 2003. “Democracy, Rent Seeking, Public Spending and Growth.” Journal of Public Economics 87(3-4), 445-466.Google Scholar
  55. Montinola, G. R., and R. W. Jackman. 2002. “Sources of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study.” British Journal of Political Science 32(1), 147-170.Google Scholar
  56. Moreno, A. 2002. “Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment.” Comparative Sociology 1(3), 495-507.Google Scholar
  57. Mulcahy, S. 2011. Money, Politics; Power: Corruption Risks in Europe. Berlin: Transparency International, International Secretariat.Google Scholar
  58. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2013. “Controlling Corruption Through Collective Action.” Journal of Democracy 24(1), 101-115.Google Scholar
  59. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Nistotskaya, M., and L. Cingolani. 2016. “Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality, and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective: Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3), 519-534.Google Scholar
  61. North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2013. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. OECD. 2004. Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: OECD Guidelines and Country Experience. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  63. OECD. 2011. Fighting Corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Asset Declarations for Public Officials. A Tool to Prevent Corruption. http://www.oecd.org/corruption/anti-bribery/47489446.pdf. Accessed: 27 October 2016.
  64. OECD. 2013. Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying http://www.oecd.org/corruption/ethics/Lobbying-Brochure.pdf. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  65. Olteanu, T. 2012. Korruption in der Demokratie. In Olteanu, T. (Ed.), Korrupte Demokratie?, 267-294. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  66. Paige, J. M. 1999. Coffee and Power: Revolution and the Rise of Democracy in Central America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Persson, A., and M. Sjöstedt. 2015. The Political and Historical Origins of Good Government: How Social Contracts Shape Elite Behavior. In Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 69-92. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini. 2000. “Comparative Politics and Public Finance.” Journal of Political Economy 108(6), 1121-1161.Google Scholar
  69. Persson, T., G. Tabellini, and F. Trebbi. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4), 958-989.Google Scholar
  70. Posner, E. A. 2002. Law and Social Norms. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Posner, R. A., and E. B. Rasmusen. 1999. “Creating and Enforcing Norms, with Special Reference to Sanctions.” International Review of Law and Economics 19(3), 369-382.Google Scholar
  72. Putnam, R. D., R. Leonardi, and R. Y. Nanetti. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rauch, J. E., and P. B. Evans. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75(1), 49-71.Google Scholar
  74. Rock, M. T. 2009. “Corruption and Democracy.” The Journal of Development Studies 45(1), 55-75.Google Scholar
  75. Rose, R., W. Mishler, and C. Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rose-Ackerman, S. 2008. Corruption. In Rowley, C. K., and F. G. Schneider (Eds.), Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy, 551-566. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Rose-Ackerman, S. 2015. Are Corrupt Elites Necessary for Corrupt Countries? In Dahlström, C. and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 33-47. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  78. Sandholtz, W., and R. Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture, and Communism.” International Review of Sociology 15(1), 109-131.Google Scholar
  79. Seldadyo, H., and J. De Haan. 2011. “Is Corruption Really Persistent?” Pacific Economic Review 16(2), 192-206.Google Scholar
  80. Shen, C. 2005. “Corruption, Democracy, Economic Freedom, and State Strength: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46(4), 327-345.Google Scholar
  81. Smilov, D. M., and J. Toplak (Eds.). 2007. Political Finance and Corruption in Eastern Europe: The Transition Period. Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  82. Sung, H.-E. 2004. “Democracy and Political Corruption: A Cross-National Comparison.” Crime, Law and Social Change 41(2), 179-193.Google Scholar
  83. Svallfors, S. 2013. “Government Quality, Egalitarianism, and Attitudes to Taxes and Social Spending: A European Comparison.” European Political Science Review 5(3), 363-380.Google Scholar
  84. Tanzi, V. 1998. “Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope, and Cures.” IMF Staff Papers 45(4), 559-594.Google Scholar
  85. Tavits, M. 2008. “Representation, Corruption, and Subjective Well-Being.” Comparative Political Studies 41(12), 1607-1630.Google Scholar
  86. Transparency International. 2013. Lack of Public Trust in Political Parties Undermining Democracy in the Balkans. http://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/lack_of_public_trust_in_political_parties_undermining_democracy_in_the_balk. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  87. Transparency International. 2015a. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2015. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  88. Transparency International. 2015b. Europe’s Unregulated Lobbying Opens Door to Corruption. http://www.transparency.org.uk/press-releases/europes-unregulated-lobbying-opens-door-to-corruption/. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  89. Transparency International. 2016a. What is Corruption? http://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption. Accessed: 26 October 2016.
  90. Transparency International. 2016b. Governments are Doing a Poor Job at Fighting Corruption Across Europe and Central Asia. http://www.transparency.org/news/feature/governments_are_doing_a_poor_job_at_fighting_corruption_across_europe. Accessed: 18 November 2016.
  91. Transparency International 2017. Governments are Doing a Poor Job at Fighting Corruption Across Europe and Central Asia. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/governments_are_doing_a_poor_job_at_fighting_corruption_across_europe. Accessed: 04 January 2017.
  92. Treisman, D. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76(3), 399-457.Google Scholar
  93. Treaty of Lisbon. 2007. Amending the Treaty of European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community (2007/C 306/01). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT. Accessed: 05 January 2017.
  94. Uslaner, E. M., and B. Rothstein. 2016. “The Historical Roots of Corruption: State Building, Economic Inequality, and Mass Education.” Comparative Politics 48(2), 227-248.Google Scholar
  95. van Biezen, I. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  96. Warren, M. E. 2004. “What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?” American Journal of Political Science 48(2), 328-343.Google Scholar
  97. Werner, S. B. 1983. “New Directions in the Study of Administrative Corruption.” Public Adminstration Review 43(2), 146-154.Google Scholar
  98. Xezonakis, G., S. Kosmidis, and S. Dahlberg. 2015. Can Elections Combat Corruption? Accountability and Partisanship. In Dahlström, C., and L. Wängnerud (Eds.), Elites, Institutions and the Quality of Government, 283-304. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  99. You, J.-S., and Khagram, S. 2005. “A Comparative Study of Inequality and Corruption.” American Sociological Review 70(1), 136-157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations