Skip to main content

Die Innovation: Eine Neuorientierung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Psychologie der organisationalen Innovation

Zusammenfassung

Moderne Organisationen müssen innovieren oder sterben. Das kommerzielle Überleben erfordert ein differenziertes Verständnis von der Natur innovativer Produkte, der Denkprozesse, durch die solche Produkte zustande kommen, der psychologischen Ressourcen der Menschen, die solche Prozesse durchführen, sowie der externen und internen Umfelder, in denen innovative Menschen agieren. Die Psychologie der Kreativität bietet die notwendigen Einsichten, die sich aus einer Analyse dieser „Bausteine“ der Innovation ergeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Später im Buch werden die Produkte häufig als „Lösungen“ bezeichnet, weil sie nicht selten dazu führen, dass wirtschaftliche oder organisatorische Probleme gelöst werden.

  2. 2.

    Im Kap. 4 wird eingehend darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass diese Unterscheidung Einsichten in die Unterscheide zwischen älteren und jüngeren Managern ermöglicht.

  3. 3.

    Wie in späteren Kapiteln dargestellt, akzeptiert dieses Buch diese Konzipierung der Kreativität überhaupt nicht. Hier wird davon ausgegangen, dass die Kreativität nicht nur kognitive Prozess umfasst, sondern auch nicht-kognitive persönliche Merkmale (wie etwa Motivation, Gefühlslagen, Einstellungen und Wertehaltungen) und soziale Interaktionen (s. insbesondere das Kap. 4).

Literatur

  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Innovative creativity through motivational synergy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review and prospective commentary. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinants of organisational creativity: A literature review. Management Decision, 39, 834–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I. (2012). Solving the innovative puzzle: The role of innovative interpretation in opportunity formation and related processes. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 356–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. X. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R., & Kovalainen, A. (2009). Researching small firms and entrepreneurship: Past, present and future. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009a). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, A. (2007). Foreword. In S. C. Lundin & J. Tan (Hrsg.), CATS: The nine lives of innovation (S. iv–viii). Spring Hill: Management Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J., & Thomas, K. (2013). Introduction to the chapters. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on creativity (S. 1–10). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L., & Burkitt, B. (2005). Managing intellectual capital in a professional service firm: Exploring the creativity-productivity paradox. Management Accounting Research, 15, 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., & Roth, E. A. (2004). Seeing what's next: using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. Y. (2010). 10 reasons why we need INNOVATION. http://www.amcreativityassoc.org/Articles/CohenTOP%2010%20Reasons%20Why%20We%20Need%20INNOVATION.pdf. Zugegriffen: 29. Juli 2013.

  • Collis, J. (2010). Innovate or die: Outside the square business thinking. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for education and organizations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2014). Managing entrepreneurship for innovation: a psychological analysis. In R. Sternberg & G. Krauss (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and creativity (S. 21–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, T. A., Lee, R. K., & Matheson, D. (2005). Value innovation: Passport to wealth creation. Research Technology Management, 48(2), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2004). America’s looming creativity crisis. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 122–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation, (3. Aufl.). Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. (1996). Strategy as revolution. Harvard Business Review, 75, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haner, U.-E. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, P. (2008). Open and closed innovation. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovate or evaporate: Test & improve your organization's IQ, its innovation quotient. Winter Park: The New Management Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horibe, F. (2009). Creating the innovation culture: Leveraging visionaries, dissenters and other useful troublemakers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2010). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Somers: IBM Global Business Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Value innovation: The strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review, 82, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A., & Mohnen, P. A. (Hrsg.). (2001). Innovation and firm performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapper, C., & Cropley, A. J. (2000). Lifelong learning and higher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriekels, J. (2013). Innovate or die. New York: Lannoo Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R., McDermott, C. M., O'Connor, G. C., & Peters, L. S. (2000). Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J. (1998). Strategic thinking: Can it be taught? Long Range Planning, 31, 120–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. C. (1998). Sustaining innovation: Creating non-profit and government organizations that innovate naturally. San Diego: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luecke, R., & Katz, R. (2003). Managing creativity and innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P., Walsh, M. M., & Harrington, D. (2010). Defining and dimensionalizing organizational innovativeness. Paper presented at the International CHRIE Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascitelli, R. (2000). From experience: Harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxeiner, D. (2007). Strategie: Interview mit Prof. Dr. Martin Winterkorn. In Volkswagen AG Geschäftsbericht 2007 (S. 14–17). Wolfsburg: Volkswagen AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter & K. E. Bedell (Hrsg.), Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective (S. 107–154). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. In M. D. Mumford (Hrsg.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (S. 3–16). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, B. (2013). Creative intelligence: Harnessing the power to create, connect, and inspire. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, (3. Aufl.). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, D., & Buckley, F. (2007). Towards an integrative model of creativity and innovation in organisations: A psychological perspective. Irish Journal of Psychology, 28, 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. (1990). Get innovative or get dead. California Management Review, 33, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilzer, P. Z. (1990). Unlimited wealth: The theory and practice of economic alchemy. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, D. H. (2005). A whole new mind: Moving from the information age into the conceptual age. London: Allen und Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, A. (2000). Determinants of successful organisational innovation: a review of current research. Journal of Management Practice, 3(1), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K. (2009). A dynamic approach to managing contradictions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 338–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanksgiving for innovation. (2002). Economist Technology Quarterly, No. 3, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, A. P. (2003). The impact of interpersonal factors on creativity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior und Research, 9(4), 146–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. C. (2007). The nature of entrepreneurship in the informal sector: Evidence from England. Journal of Enterprising Communities, People and Places in the Global Economy, 1, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mavondo, F. T. (1999). Innovation index and its implications on organisational performance: A study of Australian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 17, 495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2008). Expanding the scope and impact of organizational creativity research. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational creativity (S. 347–368). New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cropley, D.H., Cropley, A.J. (2018). Die Innovation: Eine Neuorientierung. In: Die Psychologie der organisationalen Innovation. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17389-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17389-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17388-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17389-0

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics